Objective To evaluate the clinical curative effect of applying vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) therapy in treating extensive burns. Methods The medical records of 60 extensive burn patients admitted to this hospital from March 2009 to March 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. Grouped according to the treatment, 30 cases of VSD group received vacuum aspiration after debridement ,and 30 cases of conventional therapy group received conservative dressing. In both groups with fresh wound and after formation of granulation,the skin was taken from the head free skin, was grafted to repair the burn wound. Results In VSD group, in patients without wound sepsis ,the granulation time was (9.05±2.95)d , the skin graft survival rate was (90.12±4.88)%,and time of wound healing was (60.25±11.75)d;in patients with wound sepsis ,the granulation time was (10.23±1.77)d, skin graft survival rate was (86.48±2.52)%, and wound healing time was (64.52±7.48) d, and two cases died.In the conventional treatment group, in patients without wound sepsis, the granulation time was (14.78±5.22) d, skin graft survival rate was (70.05±9.95)%, wound healing time was (80.16±10.84) d ; in patients with wound sepsis ,the granulation time was (16.15±3.85)d, skin graft survival rate was (65.14±4.86)%, wound healing time was (85.03±5.97)d, and five cases died.The differences were tatistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusions Compared with conventional dressing, VSD controls the wound infections, promotes the growth of granular tissues, increases graft survival rate, shortens the healing time of wound, enhances the patients’ general conditions, and reduces the rate of complications and mortality.
Key words
vacuum sealing drainage;extensive burn patients /
wound healing
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] 裘华德. 负压封闭引流技术[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2003 : 24 - 122.
[2] Jeffrey C, Newswanger B, Dawn C, et al. Retrospective analysis of negative pressure wound therapy in open foot wounds with significant soft tissueDefects[J]. Adv skin care, 2004, 17(7) :354-364.
[3] 张灵芝, 张翠英. 封闭式负压引流治疗慢性创面的护理[J]. 护理学杂志, 2002, 17(1): 53.
[4] 柳晓杰, 刘贤华, 白晓东,等. 分期手术治疗难愈性创面效果评价[J]. 武警医学, 2009, 20(1): 29 - 31.
[5] Weed T, Ratliff C, Drake D B, et al. Quantifying bacterial bioburden during negative pressure woundtherapy:does the wound VAC en2 hance bacterial clearance[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2004, 52(3): 276-280.
[6] Cro C,George K J,Donnelly J. Vacuum assisted closure system in the management of enterocutaneousfistulae [J].Medical Journal, 2002, 78: 364-365.
[7] 石永新, 羊明智. 负压封闭引流技术治疗感染创面的临床观察[J]. 临床骨科杂志, 2010, 13(3): 302-303.
[8] 黄巧洪. 负压封闭引流技术的研究进展[J].微创医学,2010,5(5): 512-514.
[9] 吕小星, 曹大勇, 陈绍宗, 等. 封闭负压引流技术对人慢性创面周围组织PDGF及TGF-β表达的影响[J]. 中国美容整形外科杂志, 2006, 17(6): 470-472.
[10] 苏开新. VSD负压封闭引流术在整形外科的应用[J]. 中国中医药医讯息, 2010,6(1): 36-37.
[11] 陈 伟, 张 斌, 唐孝明, 等. 负压引流治疗软组织缺损感染创面效果观察[J]. 实用医院临床杂志,2011, 8(3): 74-75.
[12] 马建斌, 刘 群. 负压封闭引流技术联合皮片移植修复四肢深度烧伤[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2011, 6(1): 51-55.
[13] 聂兰军, 宋 辉, 蔡 薇, 等. 负压创面治疗技术的研究进展[J]. 感染、炎症、修复, 2008, 9(3):191-192.
[14] 蒋均远, 方礼明, 黄 楠, 等. 骨科开放损伤病灶两种吸引方式的比较[J]. 武警医学, 2010, 21(7): 595-600.
[15] 林秀丽, 杨浩瑾, 周 雷. 真空负压封闭技术在糖尿病足治疗中的应用[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2010, 26(7): 1243-1244.[ZK)]
(2012-07-23