Objective To evaluate the effect early pluralistic nursing on neurodevelopment of high risk infants.Methods A total of 70 high risk infants aged 1 month or under were enrolled and divided into two groups. The control group received regular nursing alone while the intervention group received both regular and pluralistic nursing. The developmental status of high risk infants in both groups was assessed using Gesell scale at the corrected age of six and twelve months respectively.Results At 6 months, there was no difference in the language domain, social domain or adaptive domain between the two groups, but the gross motor domain and fine motor domain of the intervention group were significantly better than in the control group (P<0.05). At 12 months of age, each score of the intervention group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). As for the morbidity of delayed development, there was no difference between the intervention group (25.71%) and the control group (17.64%) at 6 months (P>0.05), but it was significantly higher in the control group (22.86%) than in the intervention group (2.94%) at 12 months of age (P<0.05).Conclusions Early pluralistic nursing can effectively improve the neurodevelopment and reduce the morbidity of delayed development among high risk infants, which is worthy of wide application.
Key words
pluralistic nursing /
high risk infant /
complication /
prognosis /
neurodevelopment
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] Vohr B. Long-term outcomes of moderately preterm, late preterm, and early term infants [J]. Clin Perinatol, 2013, 40(4): 739-751.
[2] Rogers E E, Hintz S R. Early neurodevelopmental outcomes of extremely preterm infants [J]. Semin Perinatol, 2016, 40(8): 497-509.
[3] Lipner H S, Huron R F. Developmental and Interprofessional Care of the Preterm Infant: Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Through High-Risk Infant Follow-up [J]. Pediatr Clin North Am, 2018, 65(1): 135-141.
[4] Hintz S R. Defining outcomes for high-risk infants: Problems and possibilities [J]. Semin Perinatol, 2016, 40(8):495-496.
[5] Tian Y, Zhang C, Yu G, et al. Influencing factors of the neurodevelopment of high-risk infants [J]. Gen Psychiatr, 2018, 31(3): e100034.
[6] Horsley K, Ciske S J. From neurons to king county neighborhoods: partnering to promote policies based on the science of early childhood development [J]. Am J Public Health, 2005, 95(4): 562-567.
[7] 陈光福, 栾 佐. 婴幼儿脑损伤神经修复治疗专家共识 [J]. 中国当代儿科杂志, 2018, 20(10): 7857-92.
[8] Nazon E, Perron A.[Towards a pluralistic approach in nursing] [J]. Rech Soins Infirm, 2014, 116): 6-12.
[9] 张 敏, 蒙好好, 廖爱玲, 等. 早期多元化护理干预对新生儿缺氧缺血性脑病疗效的影响 [J]. 中国医药科学, 2017, 7(7): 87-91.
[10] 黄艳芳, 何东梅. 多元化护理干预在提高脑瘫高危儿体格及智能发育水平中的作用 [J]. 中国实用医药, 2018, 13(25): 156-157.
[11] 盛 尉, 仇爱珍. 多元化护理干预对脑瘫高危儿体格、智能发育水平的影响 [J]. 现代中西医结合杂志, 2016, 25(5): 558-560.
[12] 陈云静, 梁蒙蒙, 耿香菊. 脑瘫高危儿早期实施多元化护理对体格智能发育的积极影响[J]. 中国疗养医学, 2018, 27(7): 731-733.
[13] 闫 兰. 多元化护理干预在青少年精神分裂症患者中的应用效果 [J]. 中国当代医药, 2017, 24(29): 167-169.
PDF(719 KB)
