18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters combined with tumor markers for prediction of EGFR gene mutations in lung adenocarcinoma

HUANG Shiming; YANG Yang; YIN Liang; YUE Jianlan; LIN Zhichun

PDF(1030 KB)

Medical Journal of the Chinese People Armed Police Forces ›› 2020, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6) : 503-508.

¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters combined with tumor markers for prediction of EGFR gene mutations in lung adenocarcinoma

HUANG Shiming¹, YANG Yang², YIN Liang¹, YUE Jianlan¹, LIN Zhichun¹

Author information +

History +

Abstract

Objective To investigate the predictive value of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters combined with tumor markers for EGFR gene mutations in lung adenocarcinoma. Methods Patients who were diagnosed with primary lung cancer by PET/CT and histopathologically confirmed as cases of lung adenocarcinoma between January 2010 and August 2018 were selected. The basic clinical data, PET/CT imaging features, PET/CT metabolic parameters, tumor marker levels and EGFR gene mutation data were collected.These patients were divided into the mutation group and wild type group according to the occurrence of mutation. Based on univariate logistic regression analysis, the related parameters of predictive value for EGFR gene mutations were included in the prediction model.The working curve of ROC was drawn for these subjects, the cut-off value calculated, the AUC value of each model compared, and a model for predicting EGFR gene mutations was established before the prediction efficiency of the model was analyzed. Results A total of 105cases of lung adenocarcinoma were included, including 32 cases of mutant EGFR (30.5%) and 73 cases of wild-type EGFR (69.5%).Multivariate analysis showed that the difference in gender(χ²=5.74,P=0.017), rate of smoking(χ²=4.60,P=0.032), density(χ²=5.77,P=0.016), burr sign(χ²=2.06,P=0.015), intra-pulmonary metastasis(χ²=2.91,P=0.088), SUVmean(t=2.82,P=0.015), and CEA(t=-2.48,P=0.016) was statistically significant between the two groups (P<0.05). Four prediction models were established for EGFR gene mutations, and the corresponding prediction accuracy was 78.1%, 81.0%, 78.1%, and 81.9%, respectively. The four prediction models were of statistical significance (P<0.05). Conclusions The single factors related to EGFR gene mutations include smoking, sex, SUVmean, density, burr sign, intrapulmonary metastasis and CEA. The four prediction models based on these factors will help to analyze the occurrence of EGFR gene mutations in patients with lung cancer and guide the individualized treatment with targeted drugs.

Key words

lung adenocarcinoma / PET/CT / standardized uptake value / carcinoembryonic antigen

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

HUANG Shiming, YANG Yang, YIN Liang, YUE Jianlan, LIN Zhichun. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters combined with tumor markers for prediction of EGFR gene mutations in lung adenocarcinoma[J]. Medical Journal of the Chinese People Armed Police Forces. 2020, 31(6): 503-508

References

[1] Bousquet M E, Bernardo S, Papon L, et al. Notch inhibition overcomes resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in EGFR-driven lung adenocarcinoma[J]. J Clin Invest, 2020, 130(2): 612-624.
[2] Buckens C F, Graaf Y V D, Verkooijen H M, et al. Osteoporosis markers on low-dose lung cancer screening chest computed tomography scans predict all-cause mortality[J]. Eur Radiol, 2015, 25(1): 132-139.
[3] Ni Y, Ye X, Yang X, et al. Microwave ablation as local consolidative therapy for patients with extracranial oligometastatic EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer without progression after first-line EGFR-TKIs treatment[J]. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2020,146(1): 197-203.
[4] Wang R, Peng S, Zhang X, et al. Inhibition of NF-κB improves sensitivity to irradiation and EGFR-TKIs and decreases irradiation-induced lung toxicity[J]. IntJ Cancer, 2019, 144(1): 200-209.
[5] Zhou M, Leung A, Echegaray S, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer radiogenomics map identifies relationships between molecular and imaging phenotypes with prognostic implications[J]. Radiology, 2017, 286(1): 161845.
[6] Ying L, Kim J, Balagurunathan Y, et al. Radiomic features are associated with EGFR mutation status in lung adenocarcinomas[J]. Clin Lung Cancer, 2016, 17(5): 441-448.e446.
[7] Higgins K A, Hoang J K, Roach M C, et al. Analysis of pretreatment FDG-PET SUV parameters in head-and-neck cancer: tumor SUVmean has superior prognostic value[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2012, 82(2): 548-553.
[8] Uchibori K, Satouchi M, Sueoka-Aragane N, et al. Phase II trial of gefitinib plus pemetrexed after relapse using first-line gefitinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR gene mutations[J]. Lung Cancer, 2018, 124(10): 65-70.
[9] Zhang H, Cai W, Wang Y, et al. CT and clinical characteristics that predict risk of EGFR mutation in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Clin Oncol, 2019, 24(6): 649-659.
[10] Aguiar P N, Haaland B, Park W, et al. Cost-effectiveness of osimertinib in the first-line treatment of patientswith EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer[J]. JAMA Oncol, 2018, 4(8): 1080-1084.
[11] Auliac J B, Pérol M, Planchard D, et al. Real-life efficacy of osimertinib in pretreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR T790M mutation[J]. Lung Cancer, 2019, 127(1): 96-102.
[12] Yochum Z A, Cades J, Wang H, et al. Targeting the EMT transcription factor TWIST1 overcomes resistance to EGFR inhibitors in EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer[J]. Oncogene, 2019, 8(5): 656-670.
[13] Chapman A M, Sun K Y, Ruestow P, et al. Lung cancer mutation profile of EGFR, ALK, and KRAS: meta-analysis and comparison of never and ever smokers[J]. Lung Cancer, 2016, 102(12): 122-134.
[14] Seow W J, Matsuo K, Hsiung C A, et al. Association between GWAS-identified lung adenocarcinoma susceptibility loci and EGFR mutations in never-smoking Asian women, and comparison with findings from western populations[J]. Hum Mol Genet, 2017, 26(2): 454-465.
[15] Taioli E,Wynder E L.Endocrine factors and adenocarcinoma of the lung in women[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 1994, 86(11): 869-870.
[16] Stabile L P, Lyker J S, Gubish C T, et al. Combined targeting of the estrogen receptor and the epidermal growth factor receptor in non-small cell lung cancer shows enhanced antiproliferative effects[J]. Cancer Res, 2005, 65(4): 1459-1470.
[17] Yip S S, Kim J, Coroller T, et al. Associations between somatic mutations and metabolic imaging phenotypes in non-small cell lung cancer[J]. J Nucl Med, 2016, 58(4): 569.
[18] 张亚锐, 张旭, 胡莹莹, 等. 非小细胞肺癌18F-FDG摄取与EGFR突变的关系[J]. 中山大学学报(医学科学版), 2011, 32(5): 674-678.
[19] Yip S S F, Kim J, Coroller T P, et al. Associations between somatic mutations and metabolic imaging phenotypes in non-small cell lung cancer[J]. J Nucl Med, 2017, 58(4): 569-576.
[20] Jung M, Kim S H, Lee Y J, et al. Prognostic and predictive value of CEA and CYFRA 21-1 levels in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with gefitinib or erlotinib[J]. Exp Ther Med, 2011, 2(4): 685-693.
[21] Zang S, He Q, Bao Q, et al. Establishment and validation of a novel survival prediction scoring algorithm for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer spinal metastasis[J]. Int J Clin Oncol, 2019, 24(9): 1049-1060.
[22] Feng L X, Wang J, Yu Z, et al. Clinical significance of serum EGFR gene mutation and serum tumor markers in predicting tyrosine kinase inhibitor efficacy in lung adenocarcinoma[J]. Clin Transl Oncol, 2019, 21(8): 1005-1013.
[23] Chapman A M, Sun K Y, Ruestow P, et al. Lung cancer mutation profile of EGFR, ALK, and KRAS: meta-analysis and comparison of never and ever smokers[J]. Lung Cancer, 2016, 102(10): 122.