The impact of different degrees of alveolar bone resorption on bone density in edentulous areas

NI Yan, WU Yang, HOU Wenhui

Medical Journal of the Chinese People Armed Police Forces ›› 2026, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1) : 10-13.

PDF(921 KB)
PDF(921 KB)
Medical Journal of the Chinese People Armed Police Forces ›› 2026, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1) : 10-13.

The impact of different degrees of alveolar bone resorption on bone density in edentulous areas

  • NI Yan1, WU Yang2, HOU Wenhui2
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the relationship between bone density and bone resorption degree in the tooth-removal area using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and to provide effective basis for clinical implant preoperation evaluation. Methods A total of 460 patients with missing teeth who were admitted to the Department of Stomatology, the Third Medical Center of PLA General Hospital from November 2020 to November 2021 were selected. After CBCT imaging, all patients were divided into groups no alveolar bone resorption group, degree Ⅰ alveolar bone resorption group, degree Ⅱ alveolar bone resorption group and degree Ⅲ alveolar bone resorption group, based on the degree of alveolar bone resorption. The average bone density values of the anterior teeth, premolars and molars of each group were measured and statistically analyzed. Results For the anterior teeth and premolars, there were significant differences in bone density values among the four groups (P<0.05), and the degree of alveolar bone resorption was correlated with bone density (r=-0.42, r=-0.37; P<0.01); there was no statistically significant difference in bone density in the molars. The anterior teeth area showed a significant negative correlation (r=-0.31) in the 41-60 years age group. There was no significant correlation between age and bone mineral density in the anterior molars area and molars area groups, nor was there a significant correlation between gender and bone mineral density. Conclusions Except for grade Ⅲ bone resorption, the bone density in the missing areas of anterior teeth and premolars decreases with the increase of the degree of alveolar bone resorption.

Key words

bone density / alveolar bone resorption / horizontal resorption / age / CBCT

Cite this article

Download Citations
NI Yan, WU Yang, HOU Wenhui. The impact of different degrees of alveolar bone resorption on bone density in edentulous areas[J]. Medical Journal of the Chinese People Armed Police Forces. 2026, 37(1): 10-13

References

[1] Doyle R, Arkel R J V, Muirhead-Allwood S, et al.Impaction technique influences implant stability in low-density bone model[J].Bone Joint Res, 2020, 9(7):386-393.
[2] Chaushu L, Silva E R,Balan V E, et al, Sinus augmentation-autograft vs. fresh frozen allograft: bone density dynamics and implant stability[J]. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2021, 122(5): 467-471.
[3] Palaskar J N, Joshi N. Influence of different implant placement techniques to improve primary implant stability in low-density bone: a systematic review[J]. J Indian Prosthodont Soc, 2020, 20(1):11-16.
[4] Sgolastra F, Petrucci A, Severino M, et al, Periodontitis, implant loss and peri-implantitis:a meta-analysis[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res,2015, 26(4): e8-e16.
[5] Smith M M, Knight E T. Chronic periodontitis and implant dentistry[J]. Periodontol, 2017, 74(1): 63-73.
[6] Monje A, Alcoforado G, Padial-Molina M, et al. Generalized aggressive periodontitis as a risk factor for dental implant failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Periodontol,2014, 85(10): 1398-1407.
[7] Patel R M. Dental implants for patients with periodontitis[J]. Prim Dent J, 2020, 8(4): 54-61.
[8] Schou S. Implant treatment in periodontitis-susceptible patients: a systematic review[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2008, 35(Suppl 1): 9-22.
[9] Kido H, Schulz E E, Kumar A, et al. Implant diameter and bone density: effect on initial stability and pull-out resistance[J]. J Oral Implantol, 1997, 23(4): 163-169.
[10] Sogo M, Ikebe K,Yang T C, et al. Assessment of bone density in the posterior maxilla based on Hounsfield units to enhance the initial stability of implants[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2012,14(Suppl 1): e183-187.
[11] Sugiura T, Yamamoto K, Horita S, et al. The effects of bone density and crestal cortical bone thickness on micromotion and peri-implant bone strain distribution in an immediately loaded implant: a nonlinear finite element analysis[J]. J Periodontal Implant Sci,2016,46(3): 152-165.
[12] Kim Y J, Henkin J. Micro-computed tomography assessment of human alveolar bone: bone density and three-dimensional micro-architecture[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2015, 17(2): 307-313.
[13] Trisi P, de Benedittis S, Perfetti G, et al. Primary stability, insertion torque and bone density of cylindric implant ad modum Branemark: is there a relationship? An in vitro study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2011,22(5): 567-570.
[14] Aguirre J I, Akhter M P, Neuville K G, et al.Age-related periodontitis and alveolar bone loss in rice rats[J]. Arch Oral Biol, 2017,73: 193-205.
[15] Airila-Månsson, Söder S B, Klinge B. Bone height changes in individuals with periodontal disease: a 17-year prospective longitudinal study[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2005, 32(7): 822-827.
[16] Von Euw, Wang S Y, Laurent G, et al.Bone mineral: new insights into its chemical composition[J]. Sci Rep, 2019,9(1):8456.
[17] Attili S, Surapaneni H, Kasina S P, et al. To evaluate the bone mineral density in mandible of edentulous patients using computed tomography: an in vivo study[J]. J Int Oral Health, 2015, 7(4): 22-26.
[18] Dekker H, Schulten E.Regional differences in microarchitecture and mineralization of the atrophic edentulous mandible: a microcomputed tomography study[J]. Arch Oral Biol, 2021, 133: 105302.
[19] Chrcanovic B R, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A.Bone quality and quantity and dental implant failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2017, 30(3): 219-237.
[20] Hutchinson E F, Farella M, Hoffman J, et al.Variations in bone density across the body of the immature human mandible[J]. J Anat, 2017, 230(5): 679-688.
PDF(921 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/