目的 比较经阴道触发点与手法按摩分别联合经皮神经电刺激治疗产后盆腔肌筋膜疼痛(myofascial pelvic pain,MFPP)的效果。方法 选取2018- 05至 2019-11医院顺产后6~9周的产妇,根据MFPP诊断标准纳入509例患者,随机分为观察组(257例)和对照组(252例),观察组采用经阴道触发点联合经皮骶3神经电刺激治疗,对照组采用经皮电刺激联合按摩治疗。记录患者治疗前、治疗后痛觉评分,统计治疗有效率。结果 两组患者治疗1个月后VAS评分、性交痛程度均较治疗前明显降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗1个月后,两组VAS评分、性交痛程度差异无统计学意义;治疗后观察组盆底肌力明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组总有效率99.22%明显优于对照组的94.05%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论 经阴道触发点联合经皮骶3神经电刺激治疗产后MFPP患者效果显著,且操作简便、安全可靠。
Abstract
Objective To compare the therapeutic effect of transvaginal trigger points and manual massage combined with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation against postpartum pelvic myofascial pain (MFPP).Methods Women who had delivered in our hospital 6 to 9 weeks before between May 2018 and November 2019 were selected,509 of whom met the MFPP diagnostic criteria and were included. They were randomly divided into the observation group (257 cases) and the control group (252 cases) The observation group was treated with transvaginal trigger points combined with transcutaneous sacral nerve 3 electrical stimulation, while the control group was treated with transcutaneous electrical stimulation combined with massage. The patient’s pain scores were recorded before and after treatment. The effective rate was calculated in both groups.Results The VAS score and the degree of sexual intercourse pain of patients in the two groups were significantly lower after one month of treatment, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). After one month of treatment, there was no statistically significant difference in VAS scores or degrees of intercourse pain between the two groups. The pelvic floor muscle strength in the observation group was significantly superior to that of the control group after treatment, with significant differences(P<0.05). The total effective rate of the observation group (99.22%) was significantly better than that of the control group (94.05%), and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.01).Conclusions Transvaginal trigger points combined with percutaneous sacral 3 nerve electrical stimulation are effective in the treatment of postpartum MFPP patients, and it is a safe, user-friendly and reliable approach.
关键词
电刺激技术 /
盆腔肌筋膜疼痛 /
触发点电刺激
Key words
electrical stimulation technique /
pelvic myofascial pain /
trigger point electrical stimulation
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Speer L M, Erbele T. Chronic pelvic pain in women[J]. Am Fam Physician, 2016,93(5):380-387.
[2] Ahangari A. Prevalence of chronic pelvic pain among women: an updated review[J]. Pain Physician,2014,17(2):E141-E147.
[3] Kotarinos R. Myofascial pelvic pain[J]. Curr Pain Headache Rep,2012,16(5):433-438.
[4] 梁辉标, 叶知昀, 陈丽平, 等. 肌电生物反馈联合神经肌肉电刺激治疗产后压力性尿失禁患者的疗效观察[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2018,40(5):365-367.
[5] 付婷婷, 桑昌美, 邹存华, 等. 电刺激与屈螺酮炔雌醇促进药物流产后子宫修复的效果比较[J]. 现代妇产科进展, 2020,29(2):116-119.
[6] 陈 娟, 朱 兰, 庞红霞, 等. 手法按摩结合生物反馈治疗盆底肌筋膜痛综合征17例疗效分析[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2018,34(5):547-549.
[7] 袁丽娜. 按摩结合电刺激对盆底肌筋膜疼痛综合征的治疗效果研究[J]. 中国现代医师, 2019,57(4):57-59.
[8] 刘 娟, 葛 环, 李 环, 等. 产后盆底康复流程第二部分:康复评估——病史收集、盆底组织损伤及盆底功能评估[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2015,31(5):426-432.
[9] Siedentopf F, Weijenborg P, Engman M, et al. ISPOG european consensus statement - chronic pelvic pain in women (short version) [J]. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol, 2015,36(4):161-170.
[10] Griffin K M, O’Herlihy C, O’Connell P R, et al. Combined ischemic and neuropathic insult to the anal canal in an animal model of obstetric-related trauma[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2012,55(1):32-41.
[11] 穆 靓, 刘 莉, 南淑良, 等. 经会阴三维超声观察便秘产妇产后盆底结构及功能改变[J]. 武警医学, 2018,29(9):864-867.
[12] 周秉文. 腰背痛[M]. 2版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2005:145-195.
[13] Dionisi B, Senatori R. Effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on the postpartum dyspareunia treatment[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2011,37(7):750-753.
[14] 程 芳, 谭容容, 刘素珊, 等. 电刺激结合按摩对产后盆腔肌筋膜疼痛的疗效研究[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究, 2014,25(6):1015-1018.
[15] 韩 丽, 高 珊, 杨晓丹, 等. 经皮神经电刺激联合内啡肽方案治疗肌筋膜源性慢性盆腔痛初步疗效分析[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2017,52(12):844-847.
[16] 邓翠艳. 生物反馈电刺激结合指放松治疗产后盆底痛的临床疗效及对产妇产后消极情绪的影响[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2019,34(1):211-213.
基金
2018年连云港市卫生计生科技项目(ZD1804)