体外冲击波治疗慢性髂胫束摩擦综合征的疗效及其髋膝关节运动学特征分析

刘彧, 邬春虎, 尹华东, 陈长松

武警医学 ›› 2026, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3) : 208-212.

PDF(1252 KB)
PDF(1252 KB)
武警医学 ›› 2026, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3) : 208-212. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3594.2026.03.005
论著

体外冲击波治疗慢性髂胫束摩擦综合征的疗效及其髋膝关节运动学特征分析

  • 刘彧, 邬春虎, 尹华东, 陈长松
作者信息 +

Therapeutic effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on chronic iliotibial band friction syndrome and the analysis of kinematic characteristics of hip and knee joints

  • LIU Yu, WU Chunhu, YIN Huadong, CHEN Changsong
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 探讨体外冲击波治疗(ESWT)对慢性髂胫束摩擦综合征(ITBS)患者髋膝关节运动学参数的影响,并通过三维步态分析验证其生物力学改善效应。方法 纳入30例符合纳入标准的ITBS患者,接受2次/周、连续4周的ESWT(能量密度2 bar,频率10 Hz)。于治疗前、治疗结束及结束后4周,采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)、下肢功能量表(LEFS)评估症状和功能,并通过三维步态分析系统量化髋膝关节运动学部分参数(髋内收角、髋内旋角、膝关节屈曲角、膝关节内旋角)。结果 治疗后,VAS评分由基线5.20±1.00降至2.53±1.25(P<0.001),LEFS评分由45.10±6.47提升至55.33±8.72(P<0.001),疗效持续至结束后4周(VAS=1.53±1.38,LEFS=69.87±8.03,均P<0.001)。三维步态分析显示:髋内收角从14.60°±1.19°降低至治疗结束时的9.87°±0.97°,并在4周随访时进一步优化至12.63°±2.11°(均P<0.001);髋内旋角由7.17°±1.66°降至5.90°±2.09°,维持于6.17°±1.88°,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05);膝关节屈曲角在初始接触阶段从15.27°±0.83°增至16.53°±2.00°,支撑峰阶段从43.70°±3.35°提升至46.93°±3.70°,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.005);膝关节内旋角由8.57°±0.77°降至6.77°±1.59°,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。结论 ESWT可显著缓解慢性ITBS患者疼痛,改善下肢功能,并通过优化髋膝关节运动学参数修复异常步态模式。

Abstract

Objective To investigate the effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy(ESWT) on the kinematic parameters of hip and knee joints in patients with chronic iliotibial band friction syndrome(ITBS), and to verify its biomechanical improvement effect through three-dimensional gait analysis. Methods A total of 30 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were enrolled and received ESWT twice a week for 4 weeks(energy density: 2 bar; frequency: 10 Hz). Symptoms and functions were evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) and the Lower Extremity Functional Scale(LEFS), before treatment, immediately after treatment and 4 weeks after treatment. A three-dimensional gait analysis system was used to quantify selected hip and knee kinematic parameters, including hip adduction angle, hip internal rotation angle, knee flexion angle, and knee internal rotation angle. Results After treatment, the VAS score decreased from 5.20±1.00 at baseline to 2.53±1.25 (P<0.001), and the LEFS score increased from 45.10±6.47 to 55.33±8.72 (P<0.001), and the improvements persisted at the 4-week follow-up (VAS: 1.53±1.38; LEFS: 69.87±8.03; both P<0.001). Three-dimensional gait analysis showed that the hip adduction angle decreased from 14.60°±1.19° to 9.87°±0.97° immediately after treatment and further improved to 12.63°±2.11° at 4-week follow-up (P<0.001). The hip internal rotation angle decreased from 7.17°±1.66° to 5.90°±2.09° and was maintained at 6.17°±1.88°(P<0.05). For knee flexion angle, values increased during initial contact from 15.27°±0.83° to 16.53°±2.00° and during peak stance from 43.70°±3.35° to 46.93°±3.70°(both P<0.005). The knee internal rotation angle decreased from 8.57°±0.77° to 6.77°±1.59°(P<0.001). Conclusions ESWT can significantly alleviate pain, improve lower-limb function, and help correct abnormal gait patterns by optimizing hip and knee kinematic parameters in patients with chronic ITBS.

关键词

髂胫束摩擦综合征 / 体外冲击波 / 步态 / 疼痛 / 康复

Key words

iliotibial band friction syndrome / extracorporeal shock wave therapy / gait / pain / rehabilitation

引用本文

导出引用
刘彧, 邬春虎, 尹华东, 陈长松. 体外冲击波治疗慢性髂胫束摩擦综合征的疗效及其髋膝关节运动学特征分析[J]. 武警医学. 2026, 37(3): 208-212 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-3594.2026.03.005
LIU Yu, WU Chunhu, YIN Huadong, CHEN Changsong. Therapeutic effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on chronic iliotibial band friction syndrome and the analysis of kinematic characteristics of hip and knee joints[J]. Medical Journal of the Chinese People Armed Police Forces. 2026, 37(3): 208-212 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-3594.2026.03.005
中图分类号: R686.3    R493   

参考文献

[1] Gunter P, Schwellnus M P. Local corticosteroid injection in iliotibial band friction syndrome in runners: a randomised controlled trial[J]. Br J Sports Med, 2004,38(3):269-272.
[2] 陈 帅, 谢胜宇, 高 超, 等. 髂胫束摩擦综合征的MRI特征及其与膝关节外上髁突出的相关性[J]. 武警医学, 2024,35(12):1049-1052.
[3] Muhle C, Ahn J M, Yeh L, et al. Iliotibial band friction syndrome: MR imaging findings in 16 patients and MR arthrographic study of six cadaveric knees[J]. Radiology, 1999,212(1):103-110.
[4] Kirk K L, Kuklo T, Klemme W. Iliotibial band friction syndrome[J]. Orthopedics, 2000,23(11):1209-1214.
[5] Lavine R. Iliotibial band friction syndrome[J]. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med, 2010,3(1-4):18-22.
[6] Orchard J W, Fricker P A, Abud A T, et al. Biomechanics of iliotibial band friction syndrome in runners[J]. Am J Sports Med, 1996,24(3):375-379.
[7] Walbron P, Jacquot A, Geoffroy J, et al. Iliotibial band friction syndrome: an original technique of digastric release of the iliotibial band from Gerdy’s tubercle[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2018,104(8):1209-1213.
[8] Pedowitz R N. Use of osteopathic manipulative treatment for iliotibial band friction syndrome[J]. J Am Osteopath Assoc, 2005,105(12):563-567.
[9] Schwellnus M P, Theunissen L, Noakes T D, et al. Anti-inflammatory and combined anti-inflammatory/analgesic medication in the early management of iliotibial band friction syndrome. A clinical trial[J]. S Afr Med J, 1991,79(10):602-606.
[10] Müller E H, Bonavita J, Sun Y, et al. The state of extracorporeal shockwave therapy for myofascial pain syndrome-a scoping review and a call for standardized protocols[J]. Life(Basel), 2025,15(10):1501.
[11] 姜 斌, 牛 皓, 岳寿伟, 等. 体外冲击波与超声波治疗髂胫束摩擦综合征的疗效对比研究[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2021,36(11):1430-1432.
[12] 刘 彧, 邬春虎, 吴 坤, 等. 肥胖对体外冲击波治疗膝骨关节炎疗效的影响[J]. 中国医学前沿杂志(电子版), 2024,16(6):38-43.
[13] Ruiz-Muñoz M, Rueda-Zapata L, Martinez-Barrios F J, et al. Efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in the management of chronic diabetic foot ulcer: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Med Sci(Basel), 2025,13(4):219.
[14] 马玉海, 张 霆, 赵文修, 等. 穴位及经筋结点体外冲击波疗法治疗膝骨关节炎的临床研究[J]. 浙江中西医结合杂志, 2024,34(12):1147-1150.
[15] Sharahili T M, Alzahrani H A. Effect of radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy combined with evidence-based physical therapy for adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Saudi Med J, 2025, 46(7):816-824.
[16] 刘 彧, 丁玉章, 邬春虎, 等. 冲击波治疗在军事训练伤领域的应用与展望[J]. 骨科临床与研究杂志, 2023,8(4):252-256.
[17] Vahdatpour B, Mortazavi F S, Haghighat S, et al. The efficacy of focused extracorporeal shockwave therapy for the knee osteoarthritis: a clinical trial study[J]. Adv Biomed Res, 2025,14(1):56.
[18] 张洪宇, 夏 清, 魏 露, 等. 脑卒中后偏瘫足下垂患者廓清障碍的步态特征分析[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2022,44(3):204-208.
[19] Sanchez-Alvarado A, Bokil C, Cassel M, et al. Effects of conservative treatment strategies for iliotibial band syndrome on pain and function in runners: a systematic review[J]. Front Sports Act Living, 2024,6(1):1386456.
[20] Wuerfel T, Schmitz C, Jokinen L L J. The effects of the exposure of musculoskeletal tissue to extracorporeal shock waves[J]. Biomedicines, 2022,10(5):1084.
[21] 穆 烁, 袁 冰, 杨 婷, 等. 体外冲击波对髂胫束摩擦综合征的临床疗效[J]. 广西医学, 2019,41(19):2502-2504.
[22] 刘水涛, 刘 彧, 杨 军, 等. 计算机辅助步态分析评价体外冲击波疗法治疗膝骨关节炎的效果[J]. 中国医学前沿杂志(电子版), 2016,8(3):12-15.

基金

浙江省医药卫生科研项目(2021432378);浙江省中医药科技项目(2021ZB236)

PDF(1252 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/