负压封闭引流与常规引流技术治疗四肢皮肤软组织感染疗效比较

何一成,吴 捷,孙丰华

武警医学 ›› 2012, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (10) : 881-881.

PDF(258 KB)
PDF(258 KB)
武警医学 ›› 2012, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (10) : 881-881.
临床经验总结

负压封闭引流与常规引流技术治疗四肢皮肤软组织感染疗效比较

  • 何一成,吴 捷,孙丰华
作者信息 +
文章历史 +

引用本文

导出引用
何一成,吴 捷,孙丰华. 负压封闭引流与常规引流技术治疗四肢皮肤软组织感染疗效比较[J]. 武警医学. 2012, 23(10): 881-881
中图分类号: R632   

参考文献

[1] Fleischmann W, Strecker W, Bombelli M, et al. Vacuum sealing gas treatment of soft tissue damage in open fractures[J].Unfall chirurg,1993,96:488-492.

[2] Whelan C, Stewart J, Schwartz B F. Mechanics of wound healing and importance of vacuum assisted closure in urology[J]. J Urol,2005,173(5):1463.

[3] Stechmiller J K, Kilpadi D V, Childress B, et al. Effect of vacuum assisted closure theraoy on the expression of cytokines and proteases in wound fluid of adults with pressure ulcers[J]. Wound Repair Regen,2006,14(3):371.

[4] Labler L, Oehy K. Vacuum sealing of problem wounds[J].Swiss Surg,2002,8(6):266-272.

[5] 蒋均远,方礼明,黄 楠,等.骨科开放损伤病灶两种吸引方法的比较[J]. 武警医学,2010,21(7):595-596.

[6] 陈 骅,颉黄峰.VSD负压封闭式引流治疗小儿深Ⅱ度烧伤65例[J].武警医学,2010,21(12):1070-1071.

PDF(258 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/