太原市医务人员药物不良反应认知调查

郭晓莺,李青山,程景明

武警医学 ›› 2012, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (4) : 299-301.

PDF(697 KB)
PDF(697 KB)
武警医学 ›› 2012, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (4) : 299-301.
论著

太原市医务人员药物不良反应认知调查

  • 郭晓莺1,李青山2,程景明2
作者信息 +

Survey of cognition degree for adverse drug reactions among healthcare professionals of Taiyuan City

  • GUO Xiaoying1, LI Qingshan2, and CHENG Jingming1.
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 了解太原市医务人员对药物不良反应(adverse drug reactions, ADR)的认知情况,并提出对策和建议。方法 对太原市各类等级12所医院的医务人员共计714人进行问卷调查,并依据工作年限、职称、学历、专业、单位级别进行分类比较,了解其对药品不良反应知识的掌握、认知情况,发现各人群认知情况的差异,并做统计学处理。结果 太原市医务人员对ADR的基本知识有所了解,但对于ADR的相关法规及报告制度认知有明显差异。认识度高低与工作年限和职称关系不大,与学历高低成正比,且以药学专业的认知度最高;单位级别越高越重视,与ADR相关的工作越完善。结论 加强宣传与培训,普及ADR知识;发挥专业优势作用,做好安全评价工作;提高监测人员业务水平,提升应对ADR的能力。

Abstract

Objective To find out about the medical personnel’s knowledge of adverse drug reactions (ADR) in Taiyuan on order to suggest countermeasures.  Methods Questionnaires were used inquiring 714 health care providers about their knowledge of adverse drug reactions in 12 hospitals of various grades about the knowledge of adverse drug reactions. The data collected were compared according to lengths of service, professional titles, levels of education, spheres of research and grades of places of employment. The result was analyzed statistically.  Results Medical personnel in Taiyuan had the basic knowledge of ADR, but were at different levels in their knowledge of ADR related laws and regulations and the reporting system. The cognition degrees in the medical personnel of different years of service and different professional titles were basically similar. The level of cognition was directly proportional to the level of education. Practitioners of TCM had the highest cognition degree. The higher the grade of places of employment, the more attention the professionals paid to perfection of ADR related work.Conclusions It is necessary to work on training, popularize the knowledge of ADR; bring superiority into full play, perfect the evaluation of drug safety; enhance the competence of monitoring personnel, and improve the ability to deal with ADR.

关键词

药物不良反应 / 调查分析 / 对策

Key words

adverse drug reaction / investigation / countermeasures

引用本文

导出引用
郭晓莺,李青山,程景明. 太原市医务人员药物不良反应认知调查[J]. 武警医学. 2012, 23(4): 299-301
Survey of cognition degree for adverse drug reactions among healthcare professionals of Taiyuan City[J]. Medical Journal of the Chinese People Armed Police Forces. 2012, 23(4): 299-301
中图分类号: R95    R994.11   

参考文献

[1]张克义,赵乃才.临床药物不良反应大典[M].沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,2001:96.

[2]徐青松:谁该为药品不良反应担责. http://www.gmw.cn/content/2009-07/08/content_945617.htm

[3]王晓瑜,杜文民,王宏敏,等.药品不良反应报告中存在的问题及改进建议[J].上海医药,2006,27(5):215-216.

[4]王晓瑜,杜文民,王宏敏,等.2005年上海市药品不良反应自发报告质量评价[J].中国临床药学杂志,2006,15(5):331-333.

[5]沙建萍,胡晋红,王卓,等.上海市药品不良反应监测系统中4491份有效报告的分析[J].药学实践杂志,2007,25(4):257-260.

[6]周莜青,周钱. 我国开展ADR监测工作取得的成绩、存在的误区亟待解决的问题[J].中国药房,2004,15(3):138.

[7]陆逸雁,李虹影,盛红彬,等. 不同人群药品不良反应认知度调查[J]. 中国药物警戒,2009,6(3):147-151.

[8]程景民. 药品不良反应知识读本[M]. 北京:中国档案出版社,2004:59.

[9]王琦,白海蓬,宋立刚,等. 对天津市北辰医院医务人员药品不良反应认知度调查分析[J]. 天津药学,2006,18(6):22-24.

PDF(697 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/