目的 探讨产钳助产技术对降低剖宫产率的意义。方法 2014年北京市海淀区妇幼保健院为降低剖宫产率进行产钳助产规范化培训,将2014年分娩的13 952例孕妇作为研究组,2013年分娩的11 588例孕妇作为对照组,对两组孕产妇并发症、分娩方式及母儿结局进行回顾性分析。结果 (1)2014年剖宫产率由2013年的38.8%下降至29.3%,两者比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);(2)与2013年比较,2014年产钳助产率显著升高(9.40% vs 5.85%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);(3) 2014年的产后出血率、会阴Ⅲ度以上裂伤、新生儿窒息率与2013年比较,差异无统计学意义。结论 加强产钳助产培训,提高产钳助产技术,在阴道助产指征明确和条件具备的情况下选择产钳助产术,可有效地降低剖宫产率,减少母婴并发症,促进自然分娩。
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the clinical significance of assisted vaginal delivery by forceps in vaginal delivery. Methods In order to reduce the caesarean section rate, assisted vaginal delivery by forceps training was carried out in Beijing Haidian District Maternal and Children Health Care Hospital from 2014. 13 952 pregnant women who delivered in 2014 were included in study group and another 11 588 pregnant women who delivered in 2013 were included in the control group. The complications,delivery mode and maternal and neonatal outcomes in all subjects were recorded and analyzed. Results (1) The caesarean section rate in study group was statistically significantly lower than that in the control group (29.3% vs 38.8%,P<0.01);(2) The forceps vaginal delivery rate was significantly higher in study group than that in the control group (9.40% vs 5.85%, P<0.01);(3)No statistically significant difference was observed in the frequency of postpartum hemorrhage, perineal laceration Ⅲ degree and over, and neonatal asphyxia. Conclusions Strengthening forceps delivery skills among obstetricians may help to reduce the caesarean section rate and promote vaginal delivery without increasing the maternal and neonatal complications.
关键词
产钳助产 /
剖宫产率 /
结局 /
并发症
Key words
forceps delivery /
caesarean section rate /
outcome /
complications
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gulmezoglu A M, et al.World Health Organization Global Survey on Maternal and Preinatal Health Research Group:Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia:the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-2008[J]. Lancet,2010,375:490-498.
[2] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists(the College),the Society for Maternity-Fetal Medicine, Caughey A B, et al. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 210:179-193.
[3] 胡 慧.剖宫产率升高的原因分析与对策[J].中国实用医药杂志,2013,8(5):134-136.
[4] 庞 艳,张拓红.湖北省某二级医院剖宫产原因分析[J].中国妇幼保健杂志,2010,1(5):254-257.
[5] Cotzias C S, Palerson-Brown S, Fisk N M, et al.Obstetricians say yes to maternal request for elective cesarean section:a survey of current opinion[J]. Eur Jobstet Gynecol,2001,97(1):15-16.
[6] 岑 瑾.产钳术94例临床分析[J].现代实用医学,2012,24(2):207-209.
[7] 黄醒华.对剖宫产的思考[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2003,19(7):385-388.
[8] 张 萍.低位产钳术205例临床分析[J].现代中西医结合杂志,2010,19(2):174-175.
[9] 郭培奋,孔 欣,凌金凤,等.产时限制会阴切开对母儿的近期影响[J].实用医学杂志,2013,29:3367-3369.
[10] Demissie K,Rhoads GG,Smulian JC,et al.Operative vaginal delivery and neonatal and infant adverse outcomes population based retrospective ananlysis[J].BMJ,2004,329(7456):24-29.
[11] 周 露,汪 霆,林文欣. 不同助产技术在阴道分娩中的应用效果[J].中国当代医药,2014,21(12):125-126.
[12] 曹冬如,张小燕,包 狄. 控制剖宫产率对高龄初产母婴结局影响的研究[J].中国临床医生杂志,2015,43(8):39-41.
PDF(509 KB)
