功能性烧心与难治性胃食管反流病的临床特征比较

王伟岸,张晓,陈晓光,屈亚威,刘海峰

武警医学 ›› 2015, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (12) : 1232-1233.

PDF(405 KB)
PDF(405 KB)
武警医学 ›› 2015, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (12) : 1232-1233.
论著

功能性烧心与难治性胃食管反流病的临床特征比较

  • 王伟岸,张晓,陈晓光,屈亚威,刘海峰
作者信息 +

Comparative study of clinical features of functional heartburn and refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease

  • WANG Weian,ZHANG Xiao,CHEN Xiaoguang, QU Yawei, and LIU Haifeng
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 比较功能性烧心(functional heartburn,FH)和难治性胃食管反流病(refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease,rGERD)的临床特征。方法 对24小时Ph-阻抗监测确定的8例FH和38例rGERD患者的临床资料进行分析。问卷包括一般情况、胃食管反流病、反流症状积分表(RSS),以及焦虑(SAS)、抑郁(SDS)评价量表等。结果 FH和rGERD患者的性别、年龄、体质指数(BMI)、典型症状、吸烟饮酒史、RSS、SAS、SDS评分间的差异无统计学意义;但rGERD患者胃食管反流病问卷(GerdQ)得分(中位数8)显著高于FH组(中位数6),差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论 FH患者的GerdQ 评分明显低于rGERD患者。

Abstract

Objective To compare the difference in clinical epidemiologic features between patients with functional heartburn and patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (rGERD). Methods The clinical data of eight patients with functional heartburn and 38 patients with rGERD identified by 24-hour impedance/pH monitoring were analyzed retrospectively. The questionnaire including demography characteristics and GERD questionnaire (GerdQ), reflux symptoms scale (RSS) along with Self-rating Anxiety scale (SAS) and Self-rating Depression Scale(SDS) were used. All the data were input into database by using EpiData 3.0 software and analyzed using SPSS 15.0 software. Results There were no significant differences in the age, gender, body mass index (BMI, kg/m2), symptoms as well as scores of RSS, SAS and SDS (P>0.05) between the two groups. However, GerdQ score in patients with rGERD group (median 8) was higher than FH group (median 6)(P<0.01). Conclusions GerdQ score in FH group is significantly lower than that in rGERD group.

关键词

功能性烧心 / 难治性胃食管反流病 / 胃食管反流病问卷

引用本文

导出引用
王伟岸,张晓,陈晓光,屈亚威,刘海峰. 功能性烧心与难治性胃食管反流病的临床特征比较[J]. 武警医学. 2015, 26(12): 1232-1233
WANG Weian,ZHANG Xiao,CHEN Xiaoguang, QU Yawei, and LIU Haifeng. Comparative study of clinical features of functional heartburn and refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease[J]. Medical Journal of the Chinese People Armed Police Forces. 2015, 26(12): 1232-1233
中图分类号: R571   

参考文献

[1] Sifrim D, Zerbib F. Diagnosis and management of patients with reflux symptoms refractory to proton pump inhibitors[J]. Gut, 2012, 61(9): 1340-1354.
[2] 中华医学会消化病学分会.2014年中国胃食管反流病专家共识意见[J].中华消化杂志,2014,34(10):649-661.
[3] 赵迎盼,廖 宇,钟家瑕,等. 胃食管反流病问卷(GerdQ)与反流性疾病问卷(RDQ)的比较研究[J]. 胃肠病学和肝病学杂志,2015,24(5):572-574.
[4] Niu X P, Yu B P, Wang Y D, et al. Risk factors for proton pump inhibitor refractoriness in Chinese patients with non-erosive reflux disease[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2013, 19(20): 3124.
[5] 郑晓敏,李 敏.非糜烂性反流病与功能性烧心[J]. 胃肠病学和肝病学杂志,2012,21(9):873-875.
[6] Tamura Y, Funaki Y, Izawa S, et al. Pathophysiology of functional heartburn based on Rome III criteria in Japanese patients[J].World J Gastroenterol,2015,21(16):5009-5016.
[7] Vela M F, Craft B M, Sharma N, et al.Refractory heartburn: comparison of intercellular space diameter in documented GERD vs. functional heartburn[J].Am J Gastroenterol ,2011,106(5):844-850.

基金

武警临床创新性课题(WZ2012014)

PDF(405 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/