目的 比较体外冲击波疗法及小针刀疗法治疗肱骨内上髁炎的效果。方法 肱骨内上髁炎80例被随机分成两组, 每组40例, 分别行体外冲击波治疗和小针刀治疗, 计算并比较两组术前及术后的VAS疼痛评分、HSS肘关节功能评分。结果 小针刀及体外冲击波疗法均能明显缓解肱骨内上髁炎患者肘关节的疼痛, 两组治疗后VAS评分均低于治疗前, 差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);体外冲击波组治疗后VAS评分低于小针刀组治疗后[(1.07±0.66) vs (2.24±0.75)], 差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。两组治疗后HSS评分均高于治疗前, 差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);体外冲击波组治疗后HSS评分高于小针刀组治疗后[(92.06±8.07) vs (83.71±7.65)], 差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论 在治疗肱骨内上髁炎疼痛和恢复功能方面, 体外冲击波疗法比小针刀效果更明显。
Abstract
Objective To discuss and compare the effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy and small needle knife therapy in the treatment of medial epicondylitis. Methods Eighly patients with medial epicondylitis were divided into two groups randomly, the extracorporeal shock wave therapy group(ESWT) and the small needle knife therapy group(SNKT).The visual analog scale ( VAS) score, function and overall rating were compared before and after the treatment between the two groups. Results Both therapy relieved pain significantly, the VAS scores in the two groups declined to (2.24±0.75) and (1.07±0.66)(P<0.01), respectively after treatment. The HSS scores recoverd to (83.71±7.65) and (92.06±8.07), respectively, the functions of both elbows recovered significantly(P<0.01) compared with the condition of pre-treatment. The the rapy in ESWT group was more effective than in the SNKT group(P<0.01)in pain and function. Conclusions Both extracorporeal shock wave and the small needle knife therapy can effectively treat medial epicondylitis, extracorporeal shock wave therapy has better Results than the small needle knife therapy.
关键词
体外冲击波 /
小针刀疗法 /
肱骨内上髁炎
Key words
extracorporeal shock wave therapy /
small-needle-knife therapy /
medial epicondylitis
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 高宏鹰.肱骨内上髁炎病因探讨及临床综合治疗分析[J].中国医药科学, 2012, 2(1):173-174.
[2] Inglis A E, Pellicci P M. Total elbow replacement[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1980, 62(8):1252-1258.
[3] 杜心如, 韩子玉, 徐恩多, 等. 肱骨外上髁炎病因的解剖学研究[J].中国临床解剖学杂志, 1992, 10(1):6-8.
[4] Pitzer M E, Seidenberg P H, Bader D A. Elbow tendinopathy[J]. Med Clin North Am, 2014, 98(4):833-849.
[5] Kwon B C, Kwon Y S, Bae K J. The Fascial Elevation and Tendon Origin Resection Technique for the Treatment of Chronic Recalcitrant Medial Epicondylitis[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2014, 42(7):1731-1737.
[6] 唐跃富, 杨荣光, 罗清勇, 等.针刀疗法部分适应症临床疗效讨论[J].内蒙古中医药, 2014, 33(15):72.
[7] 朱天兵.小针刀治疗肱骨外上髁炎疗效观察[J].现代诊断与治疗, 2012, 23(10):1661-1662.
[8] Wang C J, Wang F S, Yang K D.Long-term results of extracorporeal shock wave treatment for plantar fasciitis[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2006, 34(4):592-596.
[9] 张隆浩, 黄广林, 满立波.放散装与聚焦状冲击波治疗肱骨内上髁炎的疗效比较[J].中华损伤与修复杂志[电子版], 2013, 8(1):31-34.
[10] 邢更彦, 井茹芳, 杨传铎.体外冲击波治疗网球肘、肩周炎及跟痛症的作用探讨[J].现代康复, 2001, 5(11):30-31.
[11] Notarnicola A, Quagliarella L, Sasanelli N, et al. Effects of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy on Functional and Strength Recovery of Handgrip in Patients Affected by Epicondylitis[J].Ultrasound Med Biol, 2014, 10(9):466-469.
[12] 邢更彦.骨肌疾病体外冲击波疗法[M].北京:人民军医出版社, 2007:10-52.
PDF(580 KB)
