目的 探讨应用Wells评分法和修正的Geneva评分法对急诊初步诊断肺栓塞(pulmonary embolism,PE)的患者进行临床预测评估的应用价值。方法 对59例已确诊急性PE者分别应用两种评分法进行预测评分,并对其临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果 59例急性PE患者应用Wells评分法属低度临床可能者0例,中度临床可能52例,高度临床可能7例;应用修正的Geneva评分法属低度临床可能者15例;中度临床可能45例,高度临床可能1例。临床症状出现呼吸困难37例(62.7%),晕厥17例(28.8%)。辅助检查出现心电图SIQⅢTⅢ表现18例(30.5%)、心脏超声出现右心扩大和肺动脉高压18例(30.5%),血D-二聚体升高52例(88.1%)。结论 Wells评分较修正的Geneva评分更适用于评估因各种症状来急诊就诊的肺栓塞患者,对Wells评分高度危险组按指南推荐早期抗凝可降低PE患者病死率。应用修正Geneva评分需结合心电图、化验和心脏超声等进一步提高确诊率。
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the clinical value of Wells score and revised Geneva score in diagnosing pulmonary embolism for emergency patients.Methods Fifty-nine patients with confermed acute pulmonary embolism were predicted consecutively by the two scores, and clinical data were collected and analysed.Results According to Wells score,zero patient had low probability, 52 patients had intermediate probability and 7 patients had high probability, as for revised Geneva score,15 patients had low probability, 45 patients had intermediate probability and 1 was in high probability. 37 patients(6.7%) showed clinical symptoms of dyspnea and 17 patients(28.8%) exhibited syncope. In addition, positive results with SIQⅢTⅢ on ECG were yielded in 18 patients(30.5%), right ventricular enlargement and pulmonary artery hypertension were 18 patients(30.5%),elevated D-Dimer were 52 (88.1%).Conclusions The Wells score is superior to the revised Geneva score in accessing the emergent patients with pulmonary embolism. Wells score combined with ECG, laboratory test and echocardiograghy can raise the rate of accurate diagnosis.
关键词
肺栓塞 /
Wells评分 /
修正的Geneva评分 /
评估
Key words
pulmonary embolism /
Wells score /
Revised Geneva score /
evaluation
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Wong D D, Ramaseshan G, Mendelson R M. Comparison of the Wells and Revised Geneva Scores for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: an Australian experience[J]. Intern Med J,2011,41(1):258-263.
[2] 中华医学会呼吸学分会.肺血栓栓塞症的诊断与治疗指南(草案)[J].中华结核呼吸杂志,2001,24(5):259-261.
[3] Wells P S,Anderson D R,Rodger M,et al.Derivationof a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism:Increasing the models utilitywith the SimpliRED D-dimer[J].ThrombHaemost,2000,83(3):416-420.
[4] Le Gal G,Righini M,Roy P M,et al.Prediction of pulmonaryembolism in the emergency department:the revised Geneva score[J].Ann Intern Med,2006,144(3):165-171.
[5] Wicki J, Perneger T V,Junod A F, et al. Acssessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism in the emergency ward: a simple score [J]. Arch Intern Med, 2001,161(1):92-97.
[6] 尹春琳,魏嘉平.急性肺栓塞非特异性临床表现特征分析与误诊原因探讨[J].心肺血管病杂志,2012,31(5):593-594.
[7] 叶任高,陆再英.内科学[M].第6版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:74-82.
[8] Ceriani E, Combescure C, Le Gal G, et al. Clinical prediction rules for pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J ThrombHaemost,2010,8(5):957-970.
[9] Buller H R, Agnelli G ,Hull R D, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombolic and Thrombolytic Therapy[J].Chest,2004,126:401S-428S.
[10] European Society of Cardiology. Guidelines on diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism[J]. Eur Heart J,2000,21:1301-1336.
PDF(640 KB)
