目的 评价荧光定量16S rRNA基因检测诊断妇产科患者菌血症的应用价值。方法 2013-01至2014-12对100例疑为全身感染处于菌血症状态的住院分娩孕产妇进行常规血液培养,同时行细菌16S rRNA基因检测,包括DNA提取、设计引物和探针、PCR扩增及对扩增产物荧光定量检测,以临床诊断及血液培养阳性菌血症作为对照,计算诊断阳性率、敏感性和特异性,数据采用SPSS11.0软件进行统计分析。结果 荧光定量PCR方法检测发现菌血症阳性的患者44例,阳性率为44％,明显高于血液培养的15%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);以临床诊断及血液培养阳性菌血症作为对照,荧光PCR的诊断敏感性为87.9%,特异性为90.6%。结论 荧光定量16S rRNA基因检测的阳性率远高于血液培养,可为孕产妇患者感染提供早期、敏感的病原学诊断依据。
Abstract
Objective To develop a PCR method based on 16S rRNA genes for the diagnosis of infections among gynecological and obstetric patients in order to improve the efficiency and accuracy of bacterial detection.Methods 100 patients suspected with blood infections had their blood cultured and bacterial 16S r RNA genes were detected synchronously by extraction of DNA, primer and probe design, PCR amplification and fluorescent quantitative detection of amplified products.The positive rate, sensitivity and specificity of the two Methods were compared.Results The positive rate of PCR was 44% by PCR, which was significantly higher than 15% by blood culture. Withg the criteria of positive blood culture and/or clinical diagnosis of blood infection as control, the sensitivity was 87.9% and the specificity was 90.6% for PCR.Conclusions The positive rate of PCR was significantly higher than that of blood culture and can be used as an early and sensitive index in pathogenic diagnosis of blood infections among gynecological and obstetric patients.
关键词
16S rRNA /
孕产妇 /
菌血症 /
荧光定量聚合酶链反应
Key words
16S rRNA /
para and grevia /
blood infection /
PCR
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Peters R P, Van Agtmael M A, Danner SA, et al. New developments in the diagnosis of bloodstream infections [J]. Lancet Infect Dis, 2004, 4(12): 751-760.
[2] 吴亦栋,尚世强,李建平,等. 细菌16SrRNA基因荧光定量PCR诊断新生儿败血症 [J]. 中华儿科杂志,2007, 45 (6): 446-450.
[3] Vanden Brand M, Peters R P, Catsburg A, et al. Development of a multiplex real-time PCR assay for the rapid diagnosis of neonatal late onset sepsis[J]. J Microbiol Methods, 2014(106): 8-15.
[4] Jordan J A, Durso M B. Real-time polymerase chain reaction for detection bacterial DNA directly from blood of neonates being evaluated for sepsis [J]. J Mol Diagn, 2005, 7: 575-581.
[5] Shang S,Chen G, Wu Y, et al. Rapid diagnosis of bacterial sepsis with PCR amplification and microarray hybridization in 16SrRNA gene[J]. Pediatr Res, 2005, 58: 143-148.
[6] Deng J, Ma Z, Huang W, et al. Respiratory virus multiplex RT-PCR assay sensitivities and influence factors in hospitalized children with lower respiratory tract infections [J]. Virol Sin, 2013, 28(2): 97-102.
[7] Devine K M. Bacterial L-forms on tap: an improved methodology to generate Bacillus subtilis L-forms heralds a new era of research [J]. Mol Microbiol, 2012,83(1):10-13.
[8] Wu Y, Cheng L, Shang S, et al. Gram stain-specific-probe-based real-time PCR assay for diagnosis and discrimination of bacterial neonatal sepsis [J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2008, 46: 2613-2619.
基金
首都医科大学附属北京妇产医院科研基金(201016)
PDF(578 KB)
