目的 观察系统护理干预在骨科体外冲击波(extracorporeal shock wave, ESW)治疗肢体疼痛中的应用效果。方法 2012-01至2014-01在骨科接受ESW治疗的肢体疼痛患者328例,按随机数字表方法分成系统组(n=164)和常规组(n=164)。常规组行骨科常规护理,系统组行系统护理干预,分析两组临床疗效、疼痛指标评分及护理的满意度。结果 系统组患者临床治疗有效率(95.12%)比常规组(78.05%)高(P＜0.05),且系统组患者肢体疼痛缓解效果好,疼痛评分比常规组低(P＜0.05);系统组患者对护理的满意度(98.17%)与常规组(80.49%)相比,差异具有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论 对行ESW治疗骨科肢体疼痛患者行系统护理干预,疗效显著,具有一定临床意义。
Abstract
Objective To assess the curative effect of systematic holistic nursing care on orthopaedic patients under extracorporeal shock wave therapy for pain in the limbs. Methods 328 patients in the Department of Orthopedics of this hospital treated with extracorporeal shock wave therapy for pain in the limbs were receuited from January 2012 to January 2014. All patients were divided into two groups randomly according to random number table. One was the study group (n=164) treated with systematic holistic nursing care. The other was the control group (n=164) treated with routine nursing care. Then the results of the curative effect, the scores of pain index and the satisfaction degree of nursing care were compared with between the two groups. Results The curative effective rate in the study group(95.12%)was higher than that in the control group(78.05%) (P<0.05). The pain score in the study group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). The score of satisfaction degree of nursing care in the study group (98.17%) was significantly different from the score in the control group (80.49%) (P<0.05). Conclusions The curative effect of systematic holistic nursing care for orthopaedic patients under extracorporeal shock wave therapy for pain in the limbs is pronouncded. The study is significant for clinical application and research.
关键词
系统护理干预 /
体外冲击波 /
肢体 /
疼痛
Key words
systematic holistic nursing care /
extracorporeal shock wave /
limb /
pain
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 张欣凯, 王英晓. 体外冲击波应用于骨伤科领域[J]. 医药前沿, 2013, 24(20): 137-139.
[2] 林秋美. 骨科手术后疼痛的护理干预研究[J]. 当代医学, 2012, 18(27): 135-137.
[3] Nankaku M, Tsuboyama T, Kakinoki R, et al. Prediction of ambulation ability following total hip arthroplasty [J]. J Orthop Sci, 2011, 16(4): 359-363.
[4] 苏 琴. 系统护理措施对高龄患者髋关节置换术后生活质量的影响[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2015, 19(2): 50-52.
[5] 翟艳丽. 笑对控制疼痛的作用[J]. 国外医学·护理学分册,1999 (8): 376-377.
[6] 肖 阳. 冲击波治疗骨折延迟愈合及骨不连27例疗效观察[J]. 中国伤残医学, 2013, 23(10): 534-538.
[7] 杨金菊,罗 平. “长海痛尺”在骨折术后疼痛管理中的应用体会[J]. 中外医学研究, 2011, 9(5): 73-74.
[8] Canseco G, De Icaza-Herrera M, Fernández F, et al. Modified shock waves for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a simulation based on the Gilmore formulation [J]. Ultrasonics, 2011, 24(7): 321-323.
[9] 中华医学会骨科学分会. 骨科常见疼痛的处理专家建议[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2008, 28(1): 78-81.
[10] 王继红, 吴 新. 护理干预对骨科患者术后疼痛的影响[J]. 护理研究, 2008, 22(7): 1914-1915.
[11] 黄海艳. 骨科术后疼痛管理现状与展望[J]. 医药前沿, 2013, 3(4): 351-353.
[12] Sang H, Kim H. The effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy vs. local steroid injection for management of carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial [J]. Am J Phys Med Rehab, 2013, 31(4): 524-531.
[13] 阎世清,董化江,单娜娜,等. 应用冲击波与手术治疗骨不连疗效对比分析[J]. 中国医药导刊, 2012, 31(z1): 251-253.
[14] 孙英华, 焦兆德,王 莉,等. 体外冲击波对人工髋关节置换翻修骨水泥股骨假体取出的影响[J]. 中国骨与关节杂志, 2013, 22(8): 134-136.
[15] 林志国, 李存佳, 姜晋生, 等. 体外冲击波治疗慢性腰背痛疗效观察[J]. 医学信息, 2013, 25(13): 134-138.
[16] 刘春梅. 体外冲击波联合自体骨髓干细胞移植治疗股骨头缺血性坏死的康复护理[J]. 中国美容医学, 2011, 24(z6): 326-329.
[17] 张浩冲, 邢更彦. 冲击波在医学中的应用进展[J]. 中国医学前沿杂志(电子版), 2014, 24(1): 325-328.
[18] 王国伟,林永杰,毛军胜, 等. 体外冲击波治疗慢性肩袖损伤的疗效观察[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2013, 32(6): 152-154.
[19] 张春玲,孙胜男,张春燕,等. 创伤骨科以护士为主导的疼痛管理模式研究[J].护理学杂志, 2012, 27(2): 25-27.
PDF(755 KB)
