目的 探讨信息化管理进行压疮风险流程监控的效果。方法 将2013、2014年出院的患者分别做为对照组和观察组,对照组采用纸质表单,逐级上报,手工分析统计数据;观察组利用办公自动化系统,采用信息化管理方法。比较两组在院内压疮、围术期压疮、高危患者发生压疮情况,以及对压疮的治疗效果进行比较。结果 两组在院内压疮、围术期压疮、高危患者发生压疮情况,以及对压疮的治疗效果进行比较,χ2分别为4.459、50.297、29.666、9.379,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01或P<0.05)。观察组院内压疮、围术期压疮、高危患者发生压疮比例减少,压疮治疗效果提高。结论 信息化管理手段可以动态便捷地监控与追踪,及时干预,规范的护理会诊流程,及得当的处理,不仅便于临床动态掌握全院科室压疮风险管理情况,还可以提高压疮护理质量。
Abstract
Objective To study the effect of information management on monitoring the risk of pressure ulcer. Methods The patients discharged in 2013 and 2014 were recruited as control group and observation group. For the control group, the paper form was used, report and step by step manual analysis of statistical were performed data. For observation group, the office automation system and information management method were used. Between the two groups, pressure ulcers in hospital, perioperative pressure ulcers in patients at high risk, and therapeutic effect on pressure ulcers were compared. Results For the two groups, pressure ulcers in hospital, perioperative pressure ulcers in patients at high risk of pressure ulcers, and the effect on pressure sores were compared using chi-square, respectively (4.459, 50.297, 29.666, 50.297), the difference was statistically significant (P<0.01 or P<0.05). In observation group, the pressure sores, perioperative patients at high risk of pressure ulcers, and proportion of pressure ulcers reduced, and effeot on pressure ulcer healing increased. Conclusions Information management tools can be dynamically and conveniently monitor and track, timely intervene, standardize nursing consultation process, and properly treat, not only for clinically dynamically mastering the pressure ulcer risk management in whole hospital departments, but also can improve the quality of pressure ulcer care.
关键词
信息化 /
压疮 /
风险监控 /
效果
Key words
informatization /
pressure sores /
risk monitoring /
effectiveness
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Bennett G,Dealey C,Posnett J.The cost of pressureulcers in the UK[J].Age and Ageing, 2004,33(3):230-235.
[2] Vangilder C A,Amlung S,Harrson P,et al. Results of the 2008-2009 International Pressure Ulcer PrevalenceTM Survey and a 3-Year,Acute Care[J].Unit Specific Analysis,2009,55(11):39-45.
[3] 王 妤,陈伟菊,周佩如,等.压疮管理流程的建立与应用[J].护理管理杂志, 2007,7(2) : 47 -48.
[4] Hart S,Bergquist S,Gajewski B, et al. Reliability Testing of the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators Pressure Ulcer Indicators[J]. J Nurs Care Qual,2006,21(3):256-265.
[5] 宋文静,管晓萍,李 蓉,等. 压疮患病率调研方法研究进展[J]. 武警医学,2014,25(8):843-846.
[6] 蒋琪霞,管晓萍,苏纯音,等. 综合性医院压疮现患率多中心联合调研[J]. 中国护理管理,2013,13(1):26-30.
[7] Journal of wound ostomy and continence nursing: official publication of the wound ostomy and continence nursing society/WOCN, 1999,26(3):130-136.
[8] 谢小燕,刘雪琴.两种压疮危险因素评估量表在手术患者中信度及效度的比较研究[J].中华护理杂志,2006,41(4):359-361.
[9] 刘海英,苏纯音,胡雪萍,等.静态与动态空气垫对卧床患者减压效果的比较[J].中华现代护理杂志,2012,18(36):4363-4365.
[10] Wound,Ostomy, Continence Nurses Society(WOCN). Prevalence and Incidence: A Toolkit for Clinicians[J]. New Jersey: WOCN, 2004:6.
[11] 王华芬,孙红玲,许彩云,等. 压疮管理软件在构建压疮标准化防护体系中的应用与评价[J].中华护理杂志,2013,48(12):1104-1107.
[12] 俞国红,倪斐琳,叶会玲. 压疮全程信息化管理的实践与效果[J].护士进修杂志,2014,29(15):1361-1364.
[13] 薛水兰,郭雅娇,黄荔红,等. 预防压疮管理系统的研发与实践[J]. 解放军护理杂志,2014,31(23):58-63.
[14] Zhao G H, Hiltabidel E, Liu Y L, et al. A crosssectional descriptive study of pressure ulcer prevalence in a teaching hospital in China[J]. Ostomy Wound Manage, 2010,56(2):38-42.
PDF(592 KB)
