肾动脉支架成形术两种置入途径的疗效比较

刘新林,赵季红,周邠玮,赵晓川,孙 涛

武警医学 ›› 2016, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6) : 561-564.

PDF(663 KB)
PDF(663 KB)
武警医学 ›› 2016, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6) : 561-564.
论著

肾动脉支架成形术两种置入途径的疗效比较

  • 刘新林1,赵季红1,周邠玮1,赵晓川1,孙 涛2
作者信息 +

Comparative study of the efficacy of transbrachial and transfemoral approaches for percutaneous renal artery stenting

  • LIU Xinlin1, ZHAO Jihong1, ZHOU Binwei1, ZHAO Xiaochuan1, and SUN Tao2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 对比经肱动脉和经股动脉途径行肾动脉支架成形术(percutaneous transluminal renal artery stenting,PTRAS)安全性及有效性。方法 回顾性分析132例接受PTRAS的肾动脉狭窄(renal artery stenosis,RAS)患者,比较经肱动脉与经股动脉途径完成操作患者的临床资料、介入手术参数及结果。结果 所有入选患者(n=132)术前收缩压(150.72±22.57 )mmHg与术后收缩压(136.67±20.43)mmHg相比明显下降,差异具有统计学意义(t=4.974, P<0.01);术前舒张压(81.46±12.19)mmHg与术后舒张压(76.52±10.45) mmHg相比也有明显下降,差异有统计学意义(t=4.418, P<0.01)。术后6个月所有入选患者门诊随访收缩压(132.20±20.42)mmHg与术前相比明显下降,差异有统计学意义(t=18.523, P<0.01);门诊随访舒张压(74.22±10.57)mmHg与术前相比明显下降,差异有统计学意义(t=7.242, P<0.01)。两组靶病变狭窄程度、平均支架长度、平均置入支架直径、穿刺部位出血并发症、平均手术时间、造影剂用量比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 行PTRAS时,肱动脉途径是股动脉途径有效替代方式。

Abstract

Objective To compare the safety and efficacy of transbrachial and transfemoral approaches for percutaneous renal artery stenting (PTRAS).Methods The clinical data of 132 patients with renal artery stenosis (RAS) who underwent PTRAS were retrospectively analyzed. The clinical data and interventional operation parameters of patients treated with brachial artery and femoral artery were compared.Results The preoperative systolic blood pressure (150.72±22.57) mmHg in all patients (n=132) significantly decreased compared with the postoperative systolic blood pressure (136.67±20.43) mmHg (t=4.974, P<0.01). And the difference was statistically significant (t=4.418, P<0.01) between the preoperative diastolic blood pressure (81.46±12.19) mmHg and the postoperative diastolic blood pressure (76.52±10.45) mmHg. Six months after operation, all patients were followed up, compared with the preoperative, the systolic blood pressure (132.20±20.42) mmHg and the diastolic blood pressure(74.22±10.57)mmHg significantly decreased, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.01). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the degree of stenosis, the average length of the stent, the average diameter of the stent, the bleeding complications, the average operation time and the dosage of the contrast agent.Conclusions The transbrachial approach is an effective alternative transfemoral approach in the PTRAS.

关键词

经皮腔内肾动脉支架成形术 / 肱动脉 / 股动脉

Key words

percutaneous transluminal renal artery stenting / brachial artery / femoral artery

引用本文

导出引用
刘新林,赵季红,周邠玮,赵晓川,孙 涛. 肾动脉支架成形术两种置入途径的疗效比较[J]. 武警医学. 2016, 27(6): 561-564
LIU Xinlin, ZHAO Jihong, ZHOU Binwei, ZHAO Xiaochuan, and SUN Tao. Comparative study of the efficacy of transbrachial and transfemoral approaches for percutaneous renal artery stenting[J]. Medical Journal of the Chinese People Armed Police Forces. 2016, 27(6): 561-564
中图分类号: R541.4   

参考文献

[1] Tendera M, Aboyans V, Bartelink M L, et al. ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral artery diseases: document covering atherosclerotic disease of extracranial carotid and vertebral, mesenteric, renal, upper and lower extremity arteries: the Task Force on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Artery Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) [J]. Eur Heart J,2011,32(22):2851-2906.
[2] Zeller T. Percutaneous endovascular therapy of renal artery stenosis: technical and clinical developments in the past decade [J]. J Endovasc Ther,2004,11(Ⅱ)96-106.
[3] 陈少伯,姜铁民,赵季红,等. 经右侧肱动脉入路肾动脉支架1例 [J].临床荟萃,2006,21(3):208-209.
[4] 罗建方,王慧勇,黄文晖,等. 经桡动脉途径肾动脉狭窄介入治疗的初步经验 [J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2011,19(5):241-244.
[5] 刘 媛,罗建方,黄文晖,等. 老年腹主动脉瘤患者冠状动脉造影的临床意义[J]. 中华心血管病学杂志,2011,39(1):53-56.
[6] Bax L, Woittiez A J, Kouwenberg H J, et al. Stent placement in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis and impaired renal function: a randomized trial [J]. Ann Intern Med,2009,150(12):840-848, W150-841.
[7] Hohmann E L. Gene therapy--still a work in clinical and regulatory progress [J]. N Engl J Med,2009,361(2):193-195.
[8] Murphy T P, Cooper C J, Matsumoto A H, et al. Renal artery stent outcomes: effect of baseline blood pressure, stenosis severity, and translesion pressure gradient [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2015,66(22):2487-2494.
[9] Zeller T, Macharzina R, Rastan A, et al. Renal artery stenosis: up-date on diagnosis and treatment [J]. Vasa,2014,43(1):27-38.
[10] Guo X, Li P, Liu G, et al. Value of fractional flow reserve measurement in intracavitary therapy for patients with moderate renal artery stenosis[J]. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi,2015,43(5):413-417.
[11] Scheinert D, Braunlich S, Nonnast-Daniel B, et al. Transradial approach for renal artery stenting [J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2001,54(4):442-447.
[12] WT. W. Origin of the renal arteries from the sides of aorta[J]. Folia Morphol (Warsz),2000,58:259- 261.

PDF(663 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/