种植义齿修复KennedyⅡ类牙列缺损的咬合力分析

王晓玲, 王立军, 朱晓英, 王俭, 刘克礼

武警医学 ›› 2016, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (9) : 891-894.

PDF(789 KB)
PDF(789 KB)
武警医学 ›› 2016, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (9) : 891-894.
论著

种植义齿修复KennedyⅡ类牙列缺损的咬合力分析

  • 王晓玲, 王立军, 朱晓英, 王俭, 刘克礼
作者信息 +

Occlusion of implant support dentures for Kennedy Ⅱ patients with Tee Tester

  • WANG Xiaoling, WANG Lijun, ZHU Xiaoying, WANG Jian, and LIU Keli
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 对KennedyⅡ类牙列缺损种植义齿修复后不同时期的咬合数据进行动态分析,为临床精准调牙合提供理论依据。方法 选取KennedyⅡ类牙列缺损种植术后待修复患者26例,CAD/CAM联袂Tosoh二氧化锆全瓷冠修复,应用TeeTester测定患者修复当日,修复后1、3、6、12个月的最大咬合力、牙合力中心点(COF)及左右侧牙合力百分比差值并比较其差异。结果 种植义齿修复后的最大咬合力和左右侧牙合力百分比差值和修复前[(76.73±17.67)kg,(22.72±4.20)%]相比,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01);修复后6个月[(120.38±29.66)kg,(2.60±1.76)%]、12个月[(125.27±28.13)kg,(2.00±1.16)%]和修复当日[(98.40±25.63)kg,(4.56±2.49)%]、修复后1个月[(100.09±26.66)kg,(4.60±2.38)%]相比,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01);修复后12个月的最大咬合力和左右侧牙合力百分比差值和修复后3个月比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);修复后3个月的左右侧牙合力百分比差值低于修复当日和修复后1个月(P<0.05)。种植义齿修复前COF偏向未缺牙的一侧,修复后位于中心灰色椭圆区内。结论 KennedyⅡ类牙列缺损种植义齿修复后通过渐进性的骨受载,6个月后达到稳定。Teetester的咬合力分析数据能够客观、准确地显示咬合接触状态,精确指导临床调牙合,为保证种植修复体的长期稳定提供依据。

Abstract

Objective To analyze dynamically the occlusion data from different periods with Tee Tester after restoring the Kennedy Ⅱ patients’ teeth with implant support dentures, so as to provide a theoretical basis for clinical precision adjustable occlusion. Methods Twenty-six Kennedy Ⅱ patients after osseointegration were selected, restoring with CAD/CAM zirconia ceramic crown. TeeTester system was used to test the total occlusal force, bilateral differences of contact forces, and the position of center of force (COF) of implant support dentures on the same day of treatment ,one month, three months, six months and one year after restoration. Results There was a significant difference in the total occlusal force and the bilateral differences in contact forces between restoration before [(76.73±17.67)kg,(22.72±4.20)%] and after(P<0.01). There was also a significant difference between 6 months [(120.38±29.66)kg,(2.60±1.76)%] and 12 months [(125.27±28.13)kg,(2.00±1.16)%] after restoration along with the same day of restoration [(98.40±25.63)kg,(4.56±2.49)%] and one month after restoration[(100.09±26.66)kg,(4.60±2.38)%](P<0.01). A difference was also found in the total occlusal force and bilateral differences in contact forces between 12 months after restoration and 3 months after restoration(P<0.05). The bilateral differences in contact forces 3 months after restoration decreased compaired with that on the same day and one month after restoration(P<0.05). The COF also moved to the center area after restoration with implant support dentures. Conclusions For the Kennedy Ⅱ patients, the total occlusal force of implant support dentures achieves stability in 6 month after restoration through progressive load. Occlusion data from Tee tester is objective, accurate, displays a state of occlusal contact, and has a precise guide for clinical occlusal adjustment. Once finished, it provides a basis to ensure the long-term stability of plant restoration.

关键词

单侧游离端缺失 / 种植义齿 / 咬合力

Key words

unilateral distal-extension deletion / implant support denture / occlusal force

引用本文

导出引用
王晓玲, 王立军, 朱晓英, 王俭, 刘克礼. 种植义齿修复KennedyⅡ类牙列缺损的咬合力分析[J]. 武警医学. 2016, 27(9): 891-894
WANG Xiaoling, WANG Lijun, ZHU Xiaoying, WANG Jian, and LIU Keli. Occlusion of implant support dentures for Kennedy Ⅱ patients with Tee Tester[J]. Medical Journal of the Chinese People Armed Police Forces. 2016, 27(9): 891-894
中图分类号: R783   

参考文献

[1] 王林红,樊立杰,谷志远. 种植义齿的咬合接触设计与临床应用[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志,2009, 11(4):143-146.
[2] Mizui M, Nabeshima F, Tosa J, et al. Quantitative analysis of occlusal balance in intercuspal position using the T-Scan system [J]. Int J Prosthodont, 1994,7(1):62-71.
[3] Curtis D A, Sharma A, Finzen F C, et al. Occlusal considerations for implant restorations in the partially edentulous patient [J]. J Calif Dent Assoc, 2000, 28(10):771-779.
[4] Hoshaw S J, Brunski J B, Cochran G V B. Mechanical loading of Branemark implant affects interfacial bone modelling and remodeling [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1994, 9: 345-360
[5] Miyata T. The influence of controlled occlusal overload on peri-implant tissue: a histologic study in monkeys[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1998, 13(5): 677-683.
[6] Miyata T. The influence of controlled occlusal overload on peri-implant tissue. Part3: a histologic study in monkeys[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2000, 15(3): 425-431.
[7] 宫 苹.种植义齿修复设计[M]. 成都:四川大学出版社,2004:58-60.
[8] Kim Y, Oh T J, Misch C E, et al. Occlusal considerations in implant therapy: clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale [J]. Clin Oral Implant Res, 2005, 16(1): 26-35.
[9] Steves C J. Computerized occlusal implant management with the T-Scan Ⅱ System: a case report[J]. Dont Today, 2006, 25(2): 88-91.

基金

武警总医院二类课题(WZ20130218)


PDF(789 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/