目的 分析比较腹腔镜辅助全结肠系膜切除(laparoscopy-assisted complete mesocolic excision, LCME)与开腹全结肠系膜切除(open complete mesocolic excision, OCME)治疗老年人右半结肠癌的可行性、安全性及临床疗效观察。方法 回顾性分析河北大学附属医院2011-04至2015-09收治的老年右半结肠癌170例的临床资料,其中LCME组和OCME组各85例,比较两组患者的术中、术后临床资料及随访资料。结果 两组患者的术中出血量、初次排气时间、初次进流食时间、平均住院时间,LCME组患者明显少于OCME组,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。两组患者手术质量分级、手术时间、清扫淋巴结数目、术后心脑血管意外发生率及未见统计学差异(均P>0.05)。术后随访时间为48个月,两组患者的复发率和转移率差异无统计学意义。结论 腹腔镜辅助全结肠系膜切除术(LCME)治疗老年患者右半结肠癌的安全性、可行性、根治性,以及短期生存均不逊于传统开腹手术。
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic-assisted CME (laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision, LCME) and open CME (open complete mesocolic excision, OCME) in the treatment of elderly patients with right colon cancer. Methods Data was collected retrospectively by reviewing the medical records of 170 patients of right-sided colon cancer who had undergone right colectomy in the Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University between April 2011 and September 2015. The elderly patients were equally divided into LCME group and OCME group based on the approach to colectomy. Demographic variables including age, gender, information on surgery,pathological findings and follow-up were collected and analyzed. Results The median blood loss, median time to anal exhaust, post-operative liquid food, and hospital stay were significantly shorter or lower in LCME group than those in OCME group (P<0.05). The difference of durations of surgery, operation quality grading、cardiac-cerebrovascular accidents,tumor diameter and the number of harvested lymph nodes were not statistically significant between the two groups (P>0.05). After follow-up of 48 months, the rate of local recurrence and distant metastasis showed no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions LCME is a safe and feasible treatment for elderly patients with right colon cancer. It can facilitate the recovery of postoperative patients.
关键词
结肠肿瘤 /
全结肠系膜切除术 /
腹腔镜手术 /
右半结肠切除术 /
手术质量分级 /
老年患者
Key words
colon cancer /
complete mesocolic excision /
laparoscopic surgery /
right hemicolectomy /
operation quality grading /
senile patients
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Takada H, Ohsawa T, Iwanmoto S, et al . Changing site distribution of colorectal cancer in japan [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2002,45:1249-1254.
[2] Adamina M, Kehlet H, Tomlinson G A, et al . Delaney CP (2011) Enhanced recovery pathways optimize health outcomes and resource utilization: a meta-analysis of rando mized controlled trials in colorectal surgery[J]. Surgery,2012,149:830-840.
[3] Fullum T M, Ladapo J A, Borah B J. Gunnarsson CL (2010) Comparison of the clinical and economic outcomes between open and minimally invasive append ectomy and colectomy: evidence from a large commercial payer database[J]. Surg Endosc,2010,24(4):845-853.
[4] 孙艳武,池 畔,林惠铭,等.腹腔镜与开腹完整结肠系膜切除术的疗效比较[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2012,15(1):24-27.
[5] Hohenberger W,Weber K,Matzel K, et al .Standardized surgery for colonic cancer:complete mesocolic excision and central ligation technical notes and outcome[J].Colorectal Dis,2009,11(4):354-364.
[6] West N P,Hohenberger W,Weber K, et al .Complete mesocolie excision with central vascular ligation produces an oneologically superior specimen compared with standard surgery for carcinoma of the colon [J].J Clin Oncol,2010,28:272-278.
[7] Jacobs M, Verdsja J C, Goldstein H S.Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy) [J].Surg Laparosc Endosc,1991,1(3):144-150.
[8] 李国新,赵丽瑛,张 策. 腹腔镜中间入路法结肠癌根治术[J].中国实用外科杂志,2011,31:538-540.
[9] Guillou P J, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al . Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer MRC CLASSIC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet,2005,365: 1718-1726.
[10] agtegaal I D, van de Velde C J, van der Worp E, et al . Macroscopic evaluation of rectal cancer resection specimen: clinical significance of the pathologist in quality control[J]. J Clin Oncol,2002,20: 1729-1734.
[11] Quirke P, Sebag-Montefi ore D, Steele R, et al . Local recurrence after rectal cancer resection is strongly related to the plane of surgical dissection and is further reduced by preoperative short course radiotherapy[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2006,24 (suppl): A3512.
[12] Chang G J, Rodriguez-Bigas M A, Skibber J M, et al . Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst,2007,99:433-441.
[13] Le Voyer T E, Sigurdson E R, Hanlon A L, et al . Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analyzed : a secondary survey of Intergroup trial INT-0089[J]. J Clin Oncol,2003,21:2912-2919.
[14] Hohenberger W,Weber K,Matzel K, et al .Standardized surgery for colonic cancer:complete mesocolic excision and central ligation—technical notes and outcome [J].Colorectal Dis,2009,11:354-365.
[15] Pramateftakis M G.Optimizing colonic cancer surgery:high ligation and complete mesocolic excision during right hemicolectomy [J].Tech coloproctol,2010,14:S49- S51.
[16] 叶颖江,高志冬,王 杉,等.完整结肠系膜切除在结肠癌手术治疗中的应用[J].中华实用外科杂志,2011,31:494-496.
[17] Veenhof A A,Sietses C,von Blomberg B M, et al .The surgical stress response and postoperative immune function after laparoseopie or conventional total mesoreetal excision in rectal cancer:a randomized trial[J].Int J Colorectal Dis,2011,26:53-59.
[18] Pooh J T,Law W L,Chow L C, et al .Outcome of laparoseopie resection for eolorectal cancer in patients with hiish operative risk[J].Ann Surg Oncol,2011,18(7):1884-1890.
[19] Sun Y W, Chi P, Lin H M, et al .Risk factors of postoperative chyle leak following complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer[J]. Zhong hua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi,2012,5:328-331.
[20] Kitano S, Kitajima M, Konishi F, et al . A multicenter study on laparoscopic urgery for colorectal cancer in Japan[J]. Surg Endosc,2006,20:1348-1352.
[21] Evans C,Galustian C,Kumar D, et al .Impact of surgery on immunologic function:comparison between minimally invasive[J]. Am J Surg,2009,197(2):238-245.
基金
河北省政府资助临床医学优秀人才培养项目 (361007)
PDF(642 KB)
