梗阻型急性胆源性胰腺炎两种疗法效果比较

孙艳军,龚仁华,蔡 军,钟兴国,范育林,刘学停,杨柳生,孙登群

武警医学 ›› 2017, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (5) : 490-492.

PDF(571 KB)
PDF(571 KB)
武警医学 ›› 2017, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (5) : 490-492.
论著

梗阻型急性胆源性胰腺炎两种疗法效果比较

  • 孙艳军,龚仁华,蔡 军,钟兴国,范育林,刘学停,杨柳生,孙登群
作者信息 +

Clinical observation of Mini-invasive therapy for obstructive acute biliary pancreatitis

  • SUN Yanjun,GONG Renhua,CAI Jun,ZHONG Xingguo,FAN Yulin,LIU Xueting,YANG Lliusheng,and SUN Dengqun
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 比较腹腔镜和经内镜逆行胰胆管造影(endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancr -eatography,ERCP)两种方法治疗梗阻型急性胆源性胰腺炎(acute biliary pancreatitis,ABP)的疗效。方法 回顾性分析2010-03至2016-05收治的62例梗阻型ABP患者,所有患者均行磁共振胰胆管成像(magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography,MRCP)检查,明确诊断。其中腹腔镜治疗组39例,经ERCP联合十二指肠乳头括约肌切开术(endoscopic sphincterotomy ,EST) 23例(ERCP组),比较术后两组患者检验指标,包括两组患者术前、术后的WBC 、CRP、血清AMY指标,以及总住院时间、住院费用等指标。结果 腹腔镜组及ERCP组术相关指标恢复速度:WBC[ (4.35±0.87)d vs (5.15±1.04)d]、CRP[(3.35±1.23) d vs (3.64±0.87)d]、血清AMY[ (4.37±0.89)d vs (4.86±0.79)d],两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);而总住院天数ERCP组[(12.5±1.5) d vs (8.5±2.0)d]较高(P<0.05);两组患者均治愈,无严重并发症及死亡病例。在随访中发现2例ERCP术后患者1个月内再次发生ABP。并发症发生率差异无统计学意义。结论 腹腔镜是治疗梗阻型ABP的有效方法,并可以保留Oddi 括约肌功能,安全可靠,患者受益率高。

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and ERCP in the treatment of obstructive acute biliary pancreatitis.Methods A retrospective analysis was made of the clinical data of 62 patients with obstructive acute biliary pancreatitis treated in our hospital between March 2010 and May 2014. All the patients had undergone conventional treatment beforemagnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) was used to confirm stones in the common bile duct. Among them, 39 patients received laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (laparoscopic group), and the remaining 23 patients ERCP combined with EST (ERCP group). The postoperative changes in white blood cell (WBC) count and C-reactive protein(CRP), total hospitalization time and costs of surgery were compared between the two groups.Results There was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05)in the time taken by blood test indicators to return to normal after operation:WBC [( 4.35±0.87)d vs(5.15±1.04)d]、CRP[(3.35±1.23) d vs (3.64±0.87)d ] and blood AMY [ (4.37±0.89)d vs (4.86±0.79)d] .The total hospitalization time was longer in ERCP group[(12.5±1.5)d vs (8.5±2.0)d](P<0.05). In both groups, the cure rate was 100% and no severe complications or death occurred. During the follow-up, there were two patients whose acute biliary pancreatitis recurred in ERCP group.Conclusions Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration is safe, feasible and of more benefit for patients with obstructive acute biliary pancreatitis,and it can retain the function of the Oddi's sphincter.

关键词

胰腺炎 / 梗阻 / 胆管炎 / 腹腔镜 / 经内镜逆行胰胆管造影

Key words

pancreatitis / obstruction / cholangitis / laparoscopy / endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

引用本文

导出引用
孙艳军,龚仁华,蔡 军,钟兴国,范育林,刘学停,杨柳生,孙登群. 梗阻型急性胆源性胰腺炎两种疗法效果比较[J]. 武警医学. 2017, 28(5): 490-492
SUN Yanjun,GONG Renhua,CAI Jun,ZHONG Xingguo,FAN Yulin,LIU Xueting,YANG Lliusheng,and SUN Dengqun. Clinical observation of Mini-invasive therapy for obstructive acute biliary pancreatitis[J]. Medical Journal of the Chinese People Armed Police Forces. 2017, 28(5): 490-492
中图分类号: R657.51   

参考文献

[1] 中华医学会外科学分会胰腺外科学组. 急性胰腺炎诊治指南(2014)[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2015, 53(1):50-53.
[2] 赵秋登,邬叶锋,程邦君,等. 急性胰腺炎217例病因与临床诊治分析[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2012,18(8):615-617.
[3] 中华医学会消化病学分会胰腺疾病学组,中华胰腺病杂志编辑委员会,中华消化杂志编辑委员会. 中国急性胰腺炎诊治指南(2013年,上海)[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2013,29(9) :656-660.
[4] Lerch M M, Aghdassi A A. The role of bile acids in gallstoneinduced pancreatitis[J]. Gastroenterology, 2010, 138(2):429-433.
[5] 李 文,范君度,卢焕章,等. 经内镜及外科手术治疗肝胆外胆管结石的治疗效果比较[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2009,16(3):154-156.
[6] Van Santvoort H C, Besselink M G, de Vries A C, et al. Early endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreato- graphy in predicted severe acute biliary pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study[J]. Ann Surg, 2009,250(1):68-75.
[7] Yokoe M,Takada T, Mayumi T,et al. Japanese guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis: Japanese Guidelines 2015 [J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2015, 22(6):405-432.
[8] Van Baal M C, Besselink M G, Bakker O J, et al. Timing of cholecystectomy after mild biliary pancreatitis: a systematic review[J]. Ann Surg, 2012, 255(5):860-866.
[9] Varayu Prachayakul,Pitulak Aswakul. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography related perforation: Management and prevention[J].World J Clin Cases,2014,2(10):522-527.
[10] Sinha R. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute biliary pancreatitis: the optimal choice[J]. HPB,2008,10:332-335.

PDF(571 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/