目的 评价发散式体外冲击波疗法治疗距骨骨软骨损伤的效果。方法 选取2010-01至2016-06武警总医院就诊,并采用发散式冲击波治疗的距骨骨软骨损伤54例60个距骨,治疗方案为能量1.5～2.5 bar,5Hz,冲击2000～3000次,5次为一疗程,共治疗3～4疗程。治疗结束后3、6、12个月进行随访,通过患者踝关节VAS疼痛评分、美国足与踝协会踝与后足评分和MRI矢状面损伤面积大小评价治疗效果。结果 治疗结束后3个月,患者VAS评分降低,AOFAS评分升高,与治疗前比较均有统计学差异(P＜0.05)。治疗结束后6、12个月,患者踝关节疼痛持续缓解,功能评分不断提高(P＜0.01);治疗前平均损伤面积(2.67±1.14)cm2,治疗结束后3个月(1.97±0.77)cm2,6个月(1.04±0.61)cm2和12个月(0.46±0.25)cm2缩小更明显(P＜0.01),部分患者损伤区可完全消失。结论 发散式体外冲击波治疗轻中度距骨骨软骨损伤可获得良好疗效。
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the effect of the radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy on osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT).Methods Between January 2010 and June 2016, 54 cases of patients (60 taluses) were treated with radial shock wave. The treatment involved 1.5-2.5 bar, 5 Hz, 2000-3000 shocks every time. Five times were taken as a course of treatment, and a total of three or four courses were needed for a patient. The patients were followed up at three, six, and twelve months after treatment which was evaluated by the patients’ ankle VAS pain score, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle and Hindfoot Score, and the sagittal lesion area by MRI.Results Three months after treatment, the VAS score decreased while the AOFAS score increased, which was significantly different from that before treatment (P<0.05). Six, twelve months after treatment, the ankle pain continued to be eased, and the functional scores continued to improve (P<0.01). The lesion area was (2.67±1.14) cm2 before treatment, but was (1.97±0.77) cm2 three months after treatment, which was reduced obviously at 6 months (1.04±0.61)cm2 and 12 months (0.46±0.25) cm2 (P<0.01), and even completely disappeared in some patients.Conclusions Radial extracorporeal shock wave can achieve good curative effect in the treatment of mild to moderate osteochondral lesions of the talus.
关键词
距骨骨软骨损伤 /
发散式体外冲击波 /
损伤面积
Key words
osteochondral lesions of the talus /
radial extracorporeal shock wave /
lesion area
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 赵 斌,邢更彦. 距骨骨软骨损伤的发病机制与诊断治疗[J]. 中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2014,6(1):40-43.
[2] 中国研究型医院学会冲击波医学专业委员会,国际冲击波医学学会中国部.骨肌疾病体外冲击波疗法中国专家共识(第2版)[J]. 中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2017, 9(2):25-33.
[3] 宋秀锋,郑加法,李宏志. 成人距骨形态的解剖学研究[J]. 中国医药科学,2015,5(11):29-34.
[4] 张 波,曲家富. 距骨软骨损伤的治疗[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2016,18(3):269-272.
[5] Verhagen RA,Maas M,Dijkgraaf MG. Prospective study on diagnostic strategies in osteochondral lesions of the talus[J].J Bone Joint Surg Br,2005,87(1):41-46.
[6] Ozal S T,Akca A,Cakmakci E. Is there a relationship between talar osteochondral lesions and foot angles?[J]. Radiol Med, 2016,121(10): 801-804.
[7] Prado M P,Kennedy J G,Raduan F, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of osteochondral lesions of the ankle: current concepts[J]. Rev Bras Ortop, 2016, 51(5):489-500.
[8] Elias I,Zoga A C,Morrison W B,et al. Osteochondral lesions of the talus: localization and morphologic data from 424 patients using a novel anatomical grid scheme[J]. Foot Ankle Int,2007,28( 2) : 154-161.
[9] Dekker T J,Dekker P K,Tainter D M,et al. Treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus: acritical analysis review[J]. JBJS Rev, 2017, 5(3):e4.
[10] Aigner N, Petje G, Steinboeck G, et al. Treatment of bonemarrow oedema of the talus with the prostacyclin analogue iloprost. An MRI-controlled investigation of a new method[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2001, 83(6):855-858.
[11] Gao F,Chen N,Sun W,et al. Combined therapy with shock wave and retrograde bone marrow-derived cell transplantation for osteochondral lesions of the talus [J]. Sci Rep,2017, 7(1): 2106.
[12] Zhao Z,Ji H,Jing R, et al. Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy reduces progression of knee osteoarthritis in rabbits by reducing nitric oxide level and chondrocyte apoptosis[J].Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2012, 132(11):1547-1553.
[13] 邢更彦,张鹏礼,史 展,等. 体外冲击波疗法联合踝关节镜治疗距骨骨软骨损伤[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2011,19(12):978-981.
PDF(1555 KB)
