目的 结直肠癌同时肝转移患者行同期切除围术期采用快速康复理念的临床效果。方法 将2010-01至2016-12北京大学肿瘤医院共76例同期行原发灶切除与肝切除患者随机分为快速康复外科(Enhanced recovery after surgery,ERAS)组和传统康复组,每组38例,分别实施快速康复理念及常规康复理念。观察两组间首次排气时间、恢复正常饮食时间、住院时间、并发症发生率及再次入院率之间的差异。结果 术后首次排气时间、恢复正常饮食时间及住院时间,ERAS组分别为(3.12±1.03)d、(5.63±1.37)d、(9.20±1.36)d,传统康复组分别为(4.67±1.57)d、(7.87±1.62)d、(11.36±1.74)d,ERAS组各项天数短于传统康复组,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05);而并发症总发病率、再次入院率,ERAS组分别为4(10.5%)、3(7.9%),传统康复组分别为3(7.9%)、2(5.3%),两组比较无明显增加(P>0.05)。结论 快速康复理念应用于结直肠癌同时性肝转移同期切除围手术期康复具有良好的临床效果,值得推广应用。
Abstract
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of fast track surgery in simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastasis.Methods A total of 76 patients with primary resection and liver resection treated between January 2010 and December 2016 were randomly divided into two groups: ERAS(enhanced recovery after surgery,ERAS) group and normal group. There were 38 cases in either group. ERAS nursing and routine nursing were performed respectively in the two groups. The difference between the two groups in the first exhaust time, the time taken to return to normal diet, length of hospital stay, complication rate and the readmission rate were observed.Results The first exhaust time, time taken to resume normal diet and length of hospitalization in the fast track surgery group were (3.12±1.03)days、(5.63±1.37)days and(9.20±1.36)days, compared with (4.67±1.57)days、(7.87±1.62)days and(11.36±1.74)days in the normal group. The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The rates of complications and readmission in the ERAS group were 4(10.5%) and 3(7.9%)respectively,compared with 3(7.9%)and 2(5.3%)in normal group.There was no significant increase between the two groups.Conclusions The application of ERAS to simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastasis has a good clinical effect.
关键词
快速康复 /
结直肠癌 /
肝转移 /
同期切除
Key words
ERAS /
colorectal cancer /
liver metastasis /
simultaneous resection
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation[J]. Br J Anaesth, 1997, 78(5):606.
[2] Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey[J]. Ann Surg , 2004, 240(2): 205-213.
[3] Gustafsson U O, Scott M J, Schwenk W, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations[J]. World J Surg, 2013, 37(2):259-284.
[4] Nygren J, Thacker J, Carli F, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS(R)) Society recommendations[J]. Clin Nutr, 2012, 31: 801-816.
[5] Aarts M A, Okrainec A, Glicksman A ,et al. Adoption of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) strategies for colorectal surgery at academic teaching hospitals and impact on total length of hospital stay[J]. Surg Endosc, 2012, 26(2): 442-450.
[6] Connor S, Cross A, Sakowska M ,et al. Effects of introducing an enhanced recovery after surgery programme for patients undergoing open hepatic resection[J]. HPB (Oxford), 2013, 15(4): 294-301.
[7] Dunne D F, Yip V S, Jones R P ,et al. Enhanced recovery in the resection of colorectal liver metastases[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2014, 110(2): 197-202.
[8] Ni T G, Yang H T, Zhang H ,et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery programs in patients undergoing hepatectomy: A meta-analysis[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2015, 21(30): 9209-9216.
PDF(690 KB)
