摘要
目的 研究并分析门诊体检人群的血压与体重的相互影响,为健康教育提供可靠依据。方法 选取2015-01-01至2015-06-01医院门诊的169例老年体检患者(年龄≥60岁),面对面调查高血压病史及相关诊疗情况,由培训合格的护士测量其身高、体重和血压。结果 女性高血压罹患比例为37/74,明显高于男性的31/95(χ2=5.218,P=0.022)。男性不同体质指数分级间收缩压和舒张压差异无统计学意义(F=0.462,P=0.709;F=1.262,P=0.292);女性不同体质指数分级间收缩压和舒张压差异无统计学意义(F=2.401,P=0.075;F=2.343,P=0.081)。男性不同腰围分组中收缩压和舒张压差异无统计学意义(t=0.491,P=0.625;t=0.275,P=0.784);女性不同腰围分组中收缩压差异无统计学意义(t=0.698,P=0.488),组间舒张压差异有统计学意义(t=2.201,P=0.031)。结论 在女性中,依据腰围(WC)进行分级的两组间,肥胖组血压显著高于非肥胖组,建立健康的生活方式, 对预防高血压发生、发展有重要意义。
Abstract
Objective To investigate and analyze blood pressure interacts with body weight in elderly outpatients.Methods 169 cases of the elderly people (aged ≥60 years) were recruited from January 1st to June 1st, 2015. The face-to-face survey about history of hypertension and related medical conditions was carried out. Then qualified nurses measure their height, weight and blood pressure.Results The proportion of women suffering from hypertension is 37/74, significantly higher than the proportion of the male population 31/95 (χ2=5.218,P=0.022). No statistically significance between different classification of body mass index and blood pressure (systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure) in male population (F=0.462,P=0.709;F=1.262,P=0.292). There has statistically significance between different classification of body mass index and blood pressure (systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure) in female population (F=2.401,P=0.075;F=2.343,P=0.081). No statistically significance between different group of waist and blood pressure (systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure) in male population (t=0.491,P=0.625;t=0.275,P=0.784). There has no statistically significance between different group of waist and systolic blood pressure (t=0.698,P=0.488), while there has statistically significance between different group of waist and diastolic blood pressure (t=2.201,P=0.031) in female population.Conclusions In female population, blood pressure in obese group is significantly higher than the non-obese group according to WC classification, suggesting that female abdominal obesity is an important risk factor for hypertension prompt.
关键词
血压 /
体重 /
老年
Key words
blood pressure /
body weight /
elderly
陕海丽, 支楠, 乔书航, 杨阳, 程荟.
老年人体重与血压的关联因素分析[J]. 武警医学. 2017, 28(8): 792-794
SHAN Haili, ZHI Nan, QIAO Shuhang, YANG Yang,and CHENG Hui.
Analysis of associated factors of body weight and blood pressure in elderly[J]. Medical Journal of the Chinese People Armed Police Forces. 2017, 28(8): 792-794
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Gang H U, Tuomilehto J A, Silventoinen K A, et al. Body mass index, waist circumference, and waist-hip ratio on the risk of total and type-specific stroke[J].Arch Intern Med, 2007, 167:1420-1427.
[2] 于俊仙,刚慧军,赵贝贝.滨州市滨城区18～69岁居民体质指数和腰围与血糖及血压的关系[J].中国预防医学杂志,2012,13(12):936-940.
[3] Friedemann C, Heneghan C, Mahtani K, et al. Cardiovascular disease risk in healthy children and its association with body mass index: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. BMJ,2012,345:e4759.
[4] World Health Organization. Interim Report of the Commission on Ending Childhood Obesity. Geneva:WHO;2015[2015-04-01].http://www.who.int/end-childhood-obesity/commission-ending-childhood-obesity-interim-report.
[5] Adolescent development[webpage on the Internet.Geneva:WHO;2015[2015-02-01].http://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/topics/adolescence/dev/en/.
[6] 陈春明,孔灵芝.中国成年人超重和肥胖预防与防治指南[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:3-4.
[7] 周丽红.社区护理干预对老年高血压生活质量影响分析[J].中国社区医师,2015,31(10):150-151.
[8] 中国高血压防治指南修订委员会.中国高血压防治指南2010[J].中华高血压杂志,2011,19(8):701-743.
[9] Chorin E, Hassidim A, Hartal M, et al. Trends in Adolescents Obesity and the Association between BMI and Blood Pressure: A Cross-Sectional Study in 714,922 Healthy Teenagers[J]. Am J Hypertens,2015,28(9):1157-1163.
[10] 傅祖值. 中华内科学·下册[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社,1999: 3457.
[11] 中华人民共和国卫生部,中国高血压联盟.中国高血压防治指南.试行本,1999:5-8.
[12] Geleijnse J M, Kok F J, Grobbee D E. Impact of dietary and lifestyle factors on the prevalence of hypertension in Western populations[J].Eur J Public Health,2004,14(3):235-239.
PDF(496 KB)
