腹腔镜胆总管探查术后一期缝合与T管引流术的疗效比较

江旭东, 曹葆强, 李凯琅, 周章韵, 龚仁华

武警医学 ›› 2018, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (11) : 1051-1053.

PDF(1906 KB)
PDF(1906 KB)
武警医学 ›› 2018, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (11) : 1051-1053.
论著

腹腔镜胆总管探查术后一期缝合与T管引流术的疗效比较

  • 江旭东1,2, 曹葆强2, 李凯琅2, 周章韵2, 龚仁华2
作者信息 +

Comparison of primary suture and t-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration

  • JIANG Xudong1,2, CAO Baoqiang2, LI Kailang2, ZHOU Zhangyun2, GONG Renhua2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 比较腹腔镜下胆总管探查术(laparoscopic common bile duct exploration,LCBDE)后一期缝合与T管引流术的疗效。方法 回顾性分析2016-01至2018-01在武警安徽总队医院行LCBDE的80例患者资料,根据处置方法不同分为一期缝合组与T管引流组,各40例,比较两种手术方式相关临床指标及术后并发症的情况。结果 两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后并发症、残余结石比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);一期缝合组患者腹腔引流时间、住院时间分别为(4.18±0.75)d、(9.53±1.65)d,均短于T管引流组的(5.83±1.04)d、(13.90±0.90)d,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 LCBDE后一期缝合术安全有效,并且可减少患者住院时间。

Abstract

Objective To compare the therapeutic effect of primary suture and t-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE).Methods The clinical data of 80 patients who underwent LCBDE in Anhui Corps Hospital of Armed Police between 2016 and 2018 was analyzed retrospectively. According to surgical methods,40 cases were assigned to primary suture group while another 40 cases were assigned to t-tube drainage group. The clinical indexes of the two surgical approaches and postoperative complications were compared.Results There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the duration of operation, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative complications and residual stones (P>0.05). The duration of abdominal drainage and hospital stay were(4.18±0.75)d and(9.53±1.65)d respectively in primary suture group, compared with (5.83±1.04)d and(13.90±0.90)d in t-tube drainage group, so the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusions Primary suture after LCBDE is safe and effective while shortening hospital stay.

关键词

腹腔镜胆总管探查 / 一期缝合 / T管引流 / 对比研究

Key words

exploration of the common bile duct / primary suture / T-tube drainage / comparative study

引用本文

导出引用
江旭东, 曹葆强, 李凯琅, 周章韵, 龚仁华. 腹腔镜胆总管探查术后一期缝合与T管引流术的疗效比较[J]. 武警医学. 2018, 29(11): 1051-1053
JIANG Xudong, CAO Baoqiang, LI Kailang, ZHOU Zhangyun, GONG Renhua. Comparison of primary suture and t-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration[J]. Medical Journal of the Chinese People Armed Police Forces. 2018, 29(11): 1051-1053
中图分类号: R657.4   

参考文献

[1] 巴合提·卡力甫,戈小虎,孟 塬,等.腹腔镜胆总管探查术后一期缝合与T管引流的meta分析[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2017,24(4):489-495.[2] Zhang L D, Bie P, Wang S G, et al. A randomized comparison of primary closure and T-tube drainage of the common bile duct after laparoscopic choledochotomy[J]. Surg Endose, 2008, 22(7):1595-1600.
[3] 刘 宁,王德侯,甘建春,等.胆总管探查后一期缝合术与T管引流术的临床研究[J].肝胆外科杂志,2014,22(2):118-121.
[4] 周皓岚,付 英,黄 涛.腹腔镜下胆总管探查一期缝合治疗肝外胆管结石的安全性研究[J].中国内镜杂志,2015,21(3):311-314.
[5] 刘学礼,吴卫国,张玉豹,等.胆总管一期缝合治疗胆总管结石疗效及术后胆漏危险因素分析[J].肝胆胰外科杂志,2017,29(3):196-199,202.
[6] 张鸿涛,崔云峰,苗 彬,等.胆总管探查一期缝合的临床研究[J].中国普通外科杂志,2011,20(2):183-186.
[7] 董桂银,喻宗繁,陈江明.双镜联合胆总管切开一期缝合治疗胆总管结石的临床体会[J].肝胆外科杂志,2017,25(4):262-264.
[8] 华玉明,王京立,杨敖霖,等.双镜或三镜联合治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石[J].中国微创外科杂志,2014,14(5):396-398,401.
[9] 蔡 军,龚仁华,孙登群,等.三镜联合胆总管探查一期缝合临床分析[J].中国内镜杂志,2015,21(3):308-310.
[10] 陶永泽,陈德兴,李海滨,等.腹腔镜下经胆囊管切开取石与胆总管切开取石胆道一期缝合术的对比研究[J].中国微创外科杂志,2013,13(10):869-872.

基金

安徽省自然科学基金项目(1808085MH237)

PDF(1906 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/