重症肌无力两种微创胸腺扩大切除术长期疗效比较

尹东涛, 周雯, 黄玲, 褚剑, 梁涛, 潘晓娟, 韩冰

武警医学 ›› 2019, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (12) : 1057-1061.

PDF(966 KB)
PDF(966 KB)
武警医学 ›› 2019, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (12) : 1057-1061.
论著

重症肌无力两种微创胸腺扩大切除术长期疗效比较

  • 尹东涛1, 周雯2, 黄玲3, 褚剑1, 梁涛1, 潘晓娟1, 韩冰1
作者信息 +

Long term results of two types of minimally invasive thymectomy for myasthenia gravis

  • YIN Dongtao1,ZHOU Wen2,HUANG Ling3,CHU Jian1,LIANG Tao1,PAN Xiaojuan1,HAN Bing1
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 比较重症肌无力两种微创胸腺扩大切除术的长期疗效。方法 回顾性分析2010-06至2014-06原火箭军总医院采用两种微创方法行胸腺扩大切除术治疗的50例重症肌无力患者的临床资料及随访结果,两种术式的围术期结果比较采用χ2检验,远期疗效采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制有效率-时间曲线,log-rank法进行统计分析。结果 机器人组和胸腔镜组均顺利完成微创胸腺扩大切除术,均无中转开胸及围术期死亡。术后共发生肌无力危象4例(8.0%)。平均随访73.3个月,完全缓解率为34%(17/50),治疗总有效率为86.0%(43/50)。机器人组有效率和完全缓解率与胸腔镜组比较,差异无统计学意义。Osserman Ⅰ型有效率达100%,明显高于其他类型,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。性别、年龄、病理、手术方式和病程对5年累积有效率的影响无统计学意义。结论 胸腔镜和机器人胸腺切除术治疗重症肌无力安全、可行,长期疗效满意,两种术式对预后影响无统计学差异。

Abstract

Objective To explore the long term results of two types of minimally invasive thymectomy(MIT) for myasthenia gravis(MG).Methods Fifty patients diagnosed with MG underwent video-assisted and robotic-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy between June 2010 and June 2014 and were followed up till June 2018. The perioperative results of the two groups were analyzed by χ2 test, and the long term effects were evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.Results All the patients underwent minimally invasive thymectomy smoothly, with no conversions to thoracotomy or death. A total of 4 cases (8.0%) encountered myasthenic crisis. After 73.3 months of follow-up, the complete remission rate and overall effective rate were 34% (17/50) and 86.0% (43/50) respectively, and there was no significant difference between the two groups. According to Osserman’s criteria, patients classified as type Ⅰ displayed a significant higher effective rate than other groups by univariate analysis. No significant difference was found in the remission rate according to the gender, age, pathology, surgical procedures and the duration of symptoms.Conclusions Video-assisted and robotic-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy are both safe and feasible for MG patients and may bring about equally favorable prognosis.

关键词

重症肌无力 / 微创外科 / 胸腺扩大切除术 / 免疫治疗

Key words

myasthenia gravis / minimally invasive surgery / extensive thymectomy / immunotherapy

引用本文

导出引用
尹东涛, 周雯, 黄玲, 褚剑, 梁涛, 潘晓娟, 韩冰. 重症肌无力两种微创胸腺扩大切除术长期疗效比较[J]. 武警医学. 2019, 30(12): 1057-1061
YIN Dongtao,ZHOU Wen,HUANG Ling,CHU Jian,LIANG Tao,PAN Xiaojuan,HAN Bing. Long term results of two types of minimally invasive thymectomy for myasthenia gravis[J]. Medical Journal of the Chinese People Armed Police Forces. 2019, 30(12): 1057-1061
中图分类号: R746.1   

参考文献

[1] Blalock A, Harvey A M, Ford F R, et al. The treatment of myasthenia gravis by removal of the thymus gland: preliminary report[J]. J Am Med Assoc, 1941, 117(18):1529-1533.
[2] 张志豪, 邬冬强, 肖怀清, 等. 单孔胸腔镜下手术治疗重症肌无力5例[J]. 武警医学, 2019, 30(6): 531-533.
[3] Marulli G, Rea F. Myasthenia gravis and thymectomy: many doubts and few certainties[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2015, 48(1):46-47.
[4] 刘欣欣, 李 然, 于 磊, 等. 免疫抑制-胸腺切除联合治疗顺序和手术时机对重症肌无力结局的影响[J]. 中华胸心血管外科杂志, 2015, 31(11): 665-669.
[5] DeFilippi V J, Richman D P, Ferguson M K. Transcervical thymectomy for myasthenia gravis[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 1994, 57(1): 194-197.
[6] 王秀云, 许贤豪. 重症肌无力病人的临床绝对评分法和相对评分法[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 1997, 30(2): 87-90.
[7] Mantegazza R, Baggi F, Antozzi C, et al. Myasthenia gravis (MG): epidemiological data and prognostic factors[J]. Ann NY Acad Sci, 2003, 998(1):413-423.
[8] Sathasivam S. Current and emerging treatments for the management of myasthenia gravis[J]. Ther Clin Risk Manag, 2011, 7: 313-323.
[9] Wolfe G I, Kaminski H J, Aban I B, et al. Randomized trial of thymectomy in myasthenia gravis[J]. N Engl J Med, 2016, 375(6):511-522.
[10] 岳泓旭, 牛中喜. 胸腺上皮肿瘤手术治疗进展[J]. 武警医学, 2017, 28(3): 300-302.
[11] 范文君, 林 宏, 常 婷, 等. 胸腺切除术治疗重症肌无力的疗效及其影响因素分析[J]. 中国神经免疫学和神经病学杂志, 2016, 23(1):1-4.
[12] Ye B, Tantai J C, Li W, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the surgical treatment of Masaoka stage I thymoma[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2013, 11(1):157.
[13] Rückert J C, Swierzy M, Ismail M. Comparison of robotic and nonrobotic thoracoscopic thymectomy: a cohort study[J]. J Thorac Cardiov Surg, 2011, 141(3):673-677.
[14] Buentzel J, Heinz J, Hinterthaner M, et al. Robotic versus thoracoscopic thymectomy: the current evidence [J]. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg, 2017, 2017:e1847.
[15] 刘 博, 汪明敏, 许世广, 等. 达芬奇机器人纵隔肿瘤切除术的学习曲线?[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2017(2): 127-131.
[16] Yin D T, Huang L, Han B, et al. Independent long-term result of robotic thymectomy for myasthenia gravis, a single center experience [J]. J Thorac Dis, 2018, 10(1):321-329.
[17] Ponseti J M, Gamez J, Azem J, et al. Post thymectomy combined treatment of prednisone and tacrolimus versus prednisone alone for consolidation of complete stable remission in patients with myasthenia gravis: a non-randomized, non-controlled study[J]. Curr Med Res Opin, 2007, 23(6):1269-1278.
[18] Gotterer L, Li Y. Maintenance immunosuppression in myasthenia gravis [J]. J Neurol Sci, 2016, 369: 294-302.
[19] Cruz J L, Wolff M L, Vanderman A J, et al. The emerging role of tacrolimus in myasthenia gravis [J]. Ther Adv Neurol, 2015, 8(2):92-103.
[20] Marulli G, Schiavon M, Perissinotto E, et al. Surgical and neurologic outcomes after robotic thymectomy in 100 consecutive patients with myasthenia gravis[J]. J Thorac Cardiov Surg, 2013, 145(3):730-736.

PDF(966 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/