高原地区腹腔镜下胆总管切开探查一期缝合的可行性

胡根德, 张艾芃, 李慧彬, 徐晓东

武警医学 ›› 2019, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6) : 476-478.

PDF(621 KB)
PDF(621 KB)
武警医学 ›› 2019, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6) : 476-478.
论著

高原地区腹腔镜下胆总管切开探查一期缝合的可行性

  • 胡根德, 张艾芃, 李慧彬, 徐晓东
作者信息 +

Clinical feasibility of primary suture in laparoscopic common bill duct exploration on Tibetan plateau

  • HU Gende, ZHANG Aipeng, LI Huibin, XU Xiaodong
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 探讨西藏高原腹腔镜下胆总管切开探查一期缝合的可行性。方法 回顾性分析2015-02至2018-06武警西藏总队医院收治的48例腹腔镜下胆总管切开探查患者的病例资料,根据胆总管切开后的处理方式,分为一期缝合组及T管引流组,比较两组临床效果。结果 一期缝合组患者手术时间、术后住院时间均短于T管引流组(P<0.05),两组术中出血量、术后胆计漏发生率、拨出腹腔引流管时间、术后腹腔内少量胆囊窝积液发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义。结论 在严格掌握手术适应证的前提下,西藏高原腹腔镜下胆总管切开一期缝合是安全可行的。

Abstract

Objective To study the clinical feasibility of primary suture in laparoscopic common bill duct exploration on the Tibetan plateau.Methods This is a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent primary closure of the CBD after laparoscopic choledochotomy between February 2015 and June 2018 in Tibet Autonomous Region Corps Hospital of Chinese People’s Armed Police Force. 48 cases were divided into control group and observation group according to the operative method. 25 cases in primary closure group as observation group and 23 cases in intraoperative indwelling T-tube drainage group as control group. Clinical effect was compared between the two groups.Results The duration of surgery and the postoperative hospital stay were shorter in the observation group than in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in intraoperative blood loss, the incidence of bile leakage, duration of abdominal drainage or in the amount of ascites.Conclusions Primary suture used in laparoscopic common bill duct exploration is safe and feasible when an appropriate surgical approach is chosen on the Tibetan plateau.

关键词

腹腔镜 / 胆总管结石 / 一期缝合 / T管引流 / 西藏高原

Key words

laparoscopy / choledocholithiasis / primary suture / T-tube drainage / Tibetan plateau

引用本文

导出引用
胡根德, 张艾芃, 李慧彬, 徐晓东. 高原地区腹腔镜下胆总管切开探查一期缝合的可行性[J]. 武警医学. 2019, 30(6): 476-478
HU Gende, ZHANG Aipeng, LI Huibin, XU Xiaodong. Clinical feasibility of primary suture in laparoscopic common bill duct exploration on Tibetan plateau[J]. Medical Journal of the Chinese People Armed Police Forces. 2019, 30(6): 476-478
中图分类号: R575.62   

参考文献

[1] 刘俊杰,赵 俊.现代麻醉学[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,1997:956-957.
[2] 杨 波,侯永志,王翔飞,等. 西藏高原地区胆囊结石危险因素分析[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2018,34 (4):789-794.
[3] 董桂银,喻宗繁,陈江明.双镜联合胆总管切开一期缝合治疗胆总管结石的临床体会[J].肝胆外科杂志,2017,25(4):262-264.
[4] 黄建端,傅玉江,澎淑果,等.高原实用外科学[M].拉萨:西藏人民出版社,1991:11-12.
[5] 陈国平,仁 桑,巴桑顿珠,等.高原腹腔镜胆囊切除术不同CO2气腹压对呼吸及术后不良影响[J].西藏科技,2017, 297(12):50-52.
[6] 潘成文,吴育连.腹腔镜与开腹胆总管取石一期缝合的临床比较[J].中国微创外科杂志,2016,16(6):518-521.
[7] Podda M,Polignano F M,Lhmann A,et al.Systematic review with meta-analysis of studies comparing primary duct closure and T-tube drainage after laparoscopic commou bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis[J].Surg Endosc,2016, 30(3):845-861.
[8] 张红卫,罗 旋,曹 君,等.腹腔镜胆总管探查取石术后一期缝合不放置引流管的安全性[J].中华消化外科杂志,2014,9(13):691-693.

[9] 张爱民,熊良昆,余 佳. 腹腔镜手术一期缝合胆总管治疗胆总管结石的研究进展[J].临床外科杂志,2015,23(12):949-951.
[10] 姚国忠,晏 江,吴 醒,等.胆总管结石患者腹腔镜胆总管切开探查并一期缝合的临床体会[J].实用临床医药杂志,2018,22(17):116-118.
[11] 上官昌盛,丁佑铭.腹腔镜胆总管探查一期缝合与T管引流在治疗胆总管结石中的临床应用[J].腹部外科,2015,28(4):258-261.
[12] 彭 靖,马军亮,朱智辉,等. 腹腔镜胆总管切开取石一期缝合术的体会[J].腹部外科,2016,29(5):353-359.
[13] Alhamdani A,Mahmud S,Jameel M,et al.Primary closure of choledochotomy after emergency laparoscopic common bile duct exploration[J].Surg Endose,2008,22(10):2190-2195.

PDF(621 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/