目的 测试杀蟑烟剂在野营旱厕蝇类防治中的应用效果。方法 采用杀蟑烟剂开展野营旱厕灭蝇效果测试,并与传统的菊酯类药物滞留喷洒方法进行效果比较。结果 烟剂熏杀后1 h、24 h蝇类密度平均下降率分别为100%和(46.0±21.3)%。滞留喷洒后1 h、24 h蝇类密度平均下降率分别为(79.6±8.4)%和(52.4±10.6)%。经统计分析,本次对比试验中杀蟑烟剂杀灭效果与滞留喷洒杀灭效果相近。结论 杀蟑烟剂具有小巧便携、操作简单、节约高效等优点,适用于野营旱厕蝇类防治,值得基层部队推广应用。
Abstract
Objective To observe the efficacy of the smoking insecticide against cockroach in the control of flies in camping dry toilets.Methods The smoking insecticide against cockroach was used to eliminate flies and compared with the traditional method of residual spraying of pyrethroid insecticides.Results The average decline rates of flies density at 1 h and 24 h after using smoking insecticide were respectively (100%±0.0%) and(46.0%±21.3%). The average decline rates of flies density at 1 h and 24 h after spraying of pyrethroid insecticides were respectively (79.6%±8.4% )and(52.4%±10.6%). Through statistical analysis, the killing effect of smoking agent is close to that of the traditional method.Conclusions The smoking agent has the advantages of small size, portability, simple operation, time and labor saving, and high efficiency. So it is suitable for fly control in camping dry toilets and worthy of promoting application by elementary troops.
关键词
杀蟑烟剂 /
蝇类防治 /
野营旱厕
Key words
smoking agent /
fly control /
camping training
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 付 强,杨 惠,李 宏,等. 朱日和基地营区蝇类种群调查及防治效果评价[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2011,17(5):406.
[2] 张 勇,刘美德,钱 坤,等. 爱国卫生运动中病媒生物密度监测方法标准应用现状及对策分析[J]. 寄生虫与医学昆虫学报,2018,25(4):212-218.
[3] 王 伟,许 明,李培羽,等. 5%高效氯氰菊酯与氟铃脲混配杀虫剂现场灭蝇效果观察[J]. 环境与健康杂志,2012,29(3):212.
[4] 张仁敏,苗英迁,王福山,等. 4种滞留喷洒剂室内杀灭蝇和蟑的效果研究[J].中国国境卫生检疫杂志,2016,39(6):395-399.
[5] 胡陈明,李 雯,刘 岚. 夏季养鸡场三种常用灭蝇药物效果比较[J]. 中国家禽,2013,35(11):47-50.
[6] 冷培恩. 我国蝇类防治杀虫剂与应用技术[J]. 中华卫生杀虫药械,2012,18(4):269-273.
[7] 曹 敏,何宇平,李 平,等. 杀虫烟剂的研制与应用[J]. 旅行医学科学,2011,17(03):16-19.