目的 对比两种方法修复根管(全冠修复根管、高嵌体修复根管)用于后牙牙体缺损患者临床治疗的效果及预后状况。方法 选取2017-05至2019-05医院口腔科收治的后牙牙体缺损患者80例,按治疗方法分为两组,每组40例;A组行高嵌体修复根管治疗,B组行全冠修复根管治疗,分析患者缺牙修复效果、满意度、口腔健康状况改善情况等。结果 两组修复效果优良率分别为92.50%、95.00%,差异无统计学意义;B组满意度评分为(96.82±4.37)分,明显高于A组的(80.62±5.35)分,差异有统计学意义(t=14.362,P<0.05); B组治疗后修复体完整、与邻牙吻合、牙齿美观、咀嚼功能恢复患者构成比,治疗后口腔健康影响程度量表(oralhealthim pactprofile,OHIP-14)中各项评分,均明显优于A组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 全冠、高嵌体修复根管均可获得良好修复效果,但高嵌体修复根管对改善口腔健康状况及预后效果更好。
Abstract
Objective To compare the clinical effect and prognosis of two methods of root canal restoration (crown restoration and high inlay restoration) for posterior tooth defects.Methods The 80 patients with posterior tooth defects who were admitted to our dental department between May 2017 and May 2019 were divided into two groups: group A (40 cases) that was treated with high inlay restoration,and group B (40 cases) that received full crown and root canal therapy.The restoration effect, levels of satisfaction and oral health status of the patients were observed.Results The excellent and good rates of the two groups were 92.50% and 95.00% respectively, but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups.The score of satisfaction was significantly higher in group B (96.8±24.37) than in group A (80.62±5.35)(t=14.362,P<0.05).In group B, the percentages of patients with complete restoration, harmony with the adjacent tooth, good-looking teeth, and good masticatory function were 97.50%, 95.00%, 97.50% and 95.00%, respectively, which were significantly higher than in group A, so were oral health impact profile and OHIP-14 scores (P<0.05).Conclusions Both full crown restoration and high inlay restoration can be used in the treatment of posterior tooth defects,but the latter approach is more conductive to oral health and prognosis.
关键词
后牙牙体缺损 /
高嵌体修复根管 /
全冠修复根管 /
咀嚼功能 /
满意度 /
口腔健康
Key words
defect of posterior teeth /
high inlay for root canal repair /
root canal restoration with full crown /
masticatory function /
degree of satisfaction /
oral health
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 魏 煦,杨 芸,张 凯,等.热压铸瓷面瓷贴面的临床效果评估[J].国际口腔医学杂志,2017,44(6):696-700.
[2] 袁珊珊,胡小坤,李施园,等.2种CAD/CAM树脂-陶瓷复合材料的临床应用研究[J].南京医科大学学报(自然科学版),2019,39(2):291-294.
[3] 强卫林,李雨轩.无髓后牙全瓷高嵌体修复的研究进展[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2018,36(4):447-451.
[4] Shahram M,Alireza H,Pegah R.Microleakage of two bulk fill and one conventional composite in class ii restorations of primary posterior teeth[J].J Dent (Tehran),2017,14(3):123-131.
[5] 于 淼,姚莉莉,王春红,等.2种材料嵌体用于后牙Ⅱ类洞修复的临床效果比较[J].上海口腔医学,2018,27(1):61-64.
[6] 赵楚翘,刘志辉,王博蔚.影响后牙牙体缺损修复生物力学多因素分析研究进展[J].口腔医学研究,2017,33(12):1342-1344.
[7] Manish K,Geeti G,Komal P,et al.Evaluation of thickness of palatal masticatory mucosa in posterior teeth and its relation with age and gender[J].J Dent Sci,2017,9(4):245.
[8] 司 熙,李 莉,李秋实,等.3种不同材料嵌体修复后牙Ⅱ类洞牙体缺损对牙龈的影响及临床疗效分析[J].吉林大学学报(医学版),2018,44(4):815-819.
[9] 姚 蔚,陈维毅,李 冰,等.咬合接触对桩核冠修复后牙体及牙周组织应力分布的影响[J].中国组织工程研究,2017,21(4):615-620.
[10] 崔海亮,李云霞.全瓷高嵌体对后牙根管治疗后牙体缺损的修复作用[J].武警后勤学院学报(医学版),2018,27(4):307-310.
[11] Castillo O R,Sancho E R,Lynch C D,et al.All-ceramic inlay-retained fixed dental prostheses for replacing posterior missing teeth:a systematic review[J].J Prosthodont Res,2018,62(1):10.
[12] 季从容,刘红红,钱昌富,等.三种方法修复后牙牙体缺损的疗效比较[J].安徽医科大学学报,2017,52(5):774-776.
[13] 郭灿灿,王 丹,黄勤武,等.106例老年人残冠残根保存与修复的临床疗效[J].中国老年学杂志,2015,35(21):6206-6208.
[14] 曾 畅,樊明文,朱玲新,等.铸瓷髓腔固位冠修复根管治疗后牙齿的临床效果评价[J].口腔医学研究,2016,32(01):43-45.
[15] 李允允,江方方,郑衍亮,等.CAD/CAM高嵌体修复老年患者后牙牙体缺损的临床评价[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2019,35(4):575-578.
PDF(713 KB)
