早期声门型喉癌两种微创治疗疗效比较

杨晓蓉, 景阳

武警医学 ›› 2020, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (7) : 576-579.

PDF(742 KB)
PDF(742 KB)
武警医学 ›› 2020, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (7) : 576-579.
论著

早期声门型喉癌两种微创治疗疗效比较

  • 杨晓蓉, 景阳
作者信息 +

Therapeutic effect of two minimally invasive treatments against early glottic carcinoma and influence on patients’ quality of life and laryngeal function

  • YANG Xiaorong, JING Yang
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 探究低温等离子射频消融术和CO2激光手术治疗早期声门型喉癌的疗效及对患者术后生存质量及喉功能改善的影响。方法 回顾性分析2014-01至2016-03的83例行支撑喉镜下微创治疗早期声门型喉癌患者资料进行研究,并根据治疗方式不同进行分组,低温等离子射频消融术为观察组,CO2激光手术为观察组。采用SPSS20.0进行数据处理,观察两组手术指标及并发症情况,对比喉功能恢复及嗓音障碍指数,评估术后生活质量。Kaplan-Meier法进行预后分析,评估远期疗效。结果 观察组手术时间[(8.5±1.4) vs (12.4±2.3)min]优于对照组(P<0.05),术中出血[(10.6±5.3) vs (11.2±3.8)ml]及术后并发症方面无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后观察组喉功能恢复(84.2% vs 88.9%)与对照组比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。观察组声带形态学评分(1.2±0.4 vs 2.0±0.8)及VHI指数优于对照组(P<0.05)。术后1月观察组生活质量各维度评分高于对照组(P<0.05)。术后3年两组复发率(4.4% vs 2.7%)、无病生存率(95.6% vs 97.3%)及总生存率(93.3% vs 92.1%)差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 低温等离子射频消融术和CO2激光术均为治疗早期声门型喉癌的有效方式,但低温等离子射频消融术在术后生活质量及嗓音/声带保护方面较CO2激光术更具优势,值得推广。

Abstract

Objective To investigate the efficacy of low-temperature plasma radiofrequency ablation and CO2 laser surgery against early glottic laryngeal cancer and the effect on postoperative quality of life and laryngeal function of patients.Methods The data on 83 patients with early glottic laryngeal cancer treated with minimally invasive propping laryngoscopy between January 2014 and March 2016 was retrospectively analyzed. These patients were grouped according to treatments. SPSS20.0 was used for data processing. The surgical indicators and complications of the two groups were observed, laryngeal function recovery and voice disorder index were compared, and postoperative quality of life was evaluated. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the prognosis and evaluate the long-term efficacy.Results The duration of surgery [(8.5±1.4) vs (12.4±2.3) min]in the observation group was shorter than in the control group (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in intraoperative bleeding [(10.6±5.3) vs (11.2±3.8)ml] or postoperative complications (P>0.05). Postoperative laryngeal function recovery in the observation group (84.2% vs 88.9%) was not significantly different from that in the control group (P>0.05). The score of vocal cord morphology (1.2±0.4 vs 2.0±0.8) and VHI index of the observation group were better than in the control group (P<0.05). The score of each dimension of life quality in the observation group one month after operation was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the recurrence rate (4.4% vs 2.7%), disease-free survival rate (95.6% vs 97.3%) or overall survival rate (93.3% vs 92.1%) between the two groups three years after surgery (P>0.05).Conclusions Low temperature plasma radiofrequency ablation and CO2 laser are effective treatments for early glottic laryngeal cancer, but the first approach is more conductive to postoperative quality of life and voice/vocal cord protection, which is worthy of wider application.

关键词

早期声门型喉癌 / 低温等离子射频消融术 / CO2激光术 / 生存质量 / 喉功能

Key words

early glottic laryngeal cancer / low temperature plasma radiofrequency ablation / CO2 laser / quality of life / laryngeal function

引用本文

导出引用
杨晓蓉, 景阳. 早期声门型喉癌两种微创治疗疗效比较[J]. 武警医学. 2020, 31(7): 576-579
YANG Xiaorong, JING Yang. Therapeutic effect of two minimally invasive treatments against early glottic carcinoma and influence on patients’ quality of life and laryngeal function[J]. Medical Journal of the Chinese People Armed Police Forces. 2020, 31(7): 576-579
中图分类号: R739.65   

参考文献

[1] 林海容, 龚正鹏. 早期声门型喉癌微创治疗的研究进展[J]. 医学综述, 2016, 22(13): 2551-2554.
[2] 严 羽,朱 江.早期喉癌及喉癌前病变诊断的研究进展[J].山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报,2015,29(4):80-85.
[3] 徐 进,陈海兵,陈 曦,等.早期声门型喉癌微创治疗疗效回顾性分析[J].南京医科大学学报(自然科学版),2018,38(10):1439-1441.
[4] 陶振峰,申宇鹏.早期喉癌微创治疗研究进展[J].解放军医药杂志,2017,29(11):114-116.
[5] 郑跃彬,鄢斌成,蔡永聪,等.低温等离子刀与喉部分切除术治疗早期声门型喉癌的疗效及安全性分析[J].肿瘤预防与治疗,2019,32(8):730-735.
[6] 赵斐斐,赵 琳,崔晓波,等.低温等离子与CO2激光微创治疗早期声门型喉癌疗效及安全性比较[J].现代生物医学进展,2016,16(36):7087-7090.
[7] 李玉杰,于 敏,赵春红,等.CO2激光联合等离子射频消融术治疗早期声门型喉癌临床观察[J].中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志,2014,20(4):345-347.
[8] Shuang Y,Li C,Zhou X,et al. Outcomes of radiofrequen-cy ablation(RFA)and CO2 laser for early glottic cancer[J]. Am J Otolaryngol,2016,37(4):311-316.
[9] Galli A,Giordano L,Sarandria D,et al. Oncological and complication assessment of CO2 laser-assisted endoscopic surgery for T1-T2 glottic tumours:clinical experience[J]. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital,2016,36(3):167-173.
[10] Galli A,Giordano L,Sarandria D,et al. Oncological and complication assessment of CO2 laser-assisted endoscopic surgery for T1-T2 glottic tumours:clinical experience[J]. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital,2016,36(3):167-173
[11] Zhang Yan,Wang Binru,Sun Guangbin,et al . Carbon Dioxide Laser Microsurgery versus Low-Temperature Plasma Radiofrequency Ablation for T1a Glottic Cancer: A Single-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.[J]. Biomed Res Int,2018,2018.
[12] 双 羽,李 超,黄永望,等.低温等离子射频消融术与CO2激光治疗早期声门型喉癌疗效比较[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2015, 23(4):372-376.
[13] Weiss B G,Ihler F,Pilavakis Y,et al. Transoral laser mi-crosurgery for T1b glottic cancer:review of 51 cases[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol,2017,274(4):1997-2004.
[14] 杨淑芝,周成勇,王 丰,等. 经口低温等离子手术治疗侵犯前连合的早期声门型喉癌[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2018,53(2):86-91.

基金

陕西省社会发展科技攻关项目(2015SF267)

PDF(742 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/