目的 探讨核磁共振血管成像(MRA)联合磁共振弥散加权成像(DWI)序列对急性脑卒中动脉狭窄的诊断价值。方法 选取2015-03至2018-03入院的80例急性卒中患者为研究对象,对其MRA、DWI 以及高分辨核磁血管(HR-MRA)检查结果进行回顾性分析,以HR-MRA诊断结果为金标准,将MRA及MRA联合DWI的诊断结果进行比较。结果 MRA诊断为基底动脉狭窄的灵敏度、特异度、准确率分别为50.00%、96.87%和87.50%,MRA联合DWI检查,诊断为基底动脉狭窄的灵敏度、特异度、准确率分别为75.00%、96.87%、92.50%,后者灵敏度和准确率均高于前者。MRA诊断为大脑中动脉的灵敏度、特异度、准确率分别为63.15%、70.49%和68.75%,MRA联合DWI诊断为大脑中动脉的灵敏度、特异度、准确率分别为89.47%、86.88%、87.5%,联合诊断各项指标均高于MRA诊断。结论 相比单独MRA检查,MRA联合DWI能更准确判断动脉狭窄的部位。
Abstract
Objective To assess the applicability of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) combined with diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) in the diagnosis of arterial stenosis in acute stroke patients.Methods Eighty patients with acute stroke admitted between March 2015 and March 2018 were selected and the results of MRA, DWI and high resolution (HR-MRA) were retrospectively analyzed. The results of MRA and MRA combined with DWI were compared with those of HR-MRA.Results The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MRA in the diagnosis of basilar artery stenosis were 12.50%, 96.87% and 87.50%, respectively, compared to 75.00%, 96.87% and 92.50% respectively for MRA combined with DWI. The latter approach was more specific and accurate than the former. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MRA in diagnosing middle cerebral artery were 63.15%, 70.49% and 68.75% respectively, while those of MRA combined with DWI in were 89.47%, 86.88% and 87.5% respectively. All indexes of diagnosis with MRA combined with DWI were higher than those of MRA alone.Conclusions MRA combined with DWI can determine the location of arterial stenosis more accurately than MRA alone.
关键词
扩散加权成像 /
磁共振血管成像技术 /
高分辨磁共振血管成像技术 /
急性卒中
Key words
diffusion weighted imaging /
magnetic resonance angiography /
high resolution magnetic resonance angiography /
acute stroke
中图分类号:
R743.3
R816.1
R445.2
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 王陇德,刘建民,杨 弋,等.我国脑卒中防治仍面临巨大挑战——《中国脑卒中防治报告2018》概要[J].中国循环杂志, 2019,34(2):105-119.
[2] 高根善,卢祖能.高分辨率磁共振成像评估大脑中动脉粥样硬化性狭窄研究进展[J].卒中与神经疾病, 2016,23(2):139-141.
[3] 汪振佳,樊昭阳,刘 文,等.3D快速黑血管壁磁共振成像技术对基底动脉狭窄诊断的价值[J].心肺血管病杂志, 2019,38(3):284-289.
[4] 王 宽,孟凯龙,田志勇.高分辨核磁检查在颅内动脉血管疾病的应用及临床意义[J].中国医学物理学杂志, 2019,36(10):1207-10.
[5] 杨曼纯,白小欣,龙 玉,等.高分辨核磁共振对脑桥梗死不同病灶形态类型的病因机制研究[J].中风与神经疾病杂志, 2019, 36(9):794-797.
[6] 陈国栋,周旭洋.CTA和MRA在闭塞性脑血管疾病诊断中的对比研究[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志, 2016,19(9):12-13.
[7] 陈骥梁,赵 颖.磁共振3D-TOF序列与3D-SPACE序列在脑神经血管成像中的应用[J].医疗装备, 2016,29(21):10-11.
[8] 郭宝静,徐红卫.MRA联合CTA检查对脑血管狭窄诊断的应用价值[J].影像研究与医学应用, 2020,4(6):194-195.
[9] 李 韶.磁共振弥散加权成像联合灌注加权成像技术对不同时期老年脑梗死的诊断效果[J].慢性病学杂志, 2019, 20(9):1425-1427.
[10] 李广民,姚 剑,钟佳利,等.磁共振弥散加权成像联合灌注加权成像技术在诊断不同时期老年脑梗死的临床价值[J]. 中华老年心脑血管病杂志, 2018,20(6):572-575.