目的 探讨硬膜外麻醉下足月臀位外倒转术的影响因素。方法 回顾性分析2015-01至2021-02在首都医科大学附属北京妇产医院产检的B超确诊为单胎臀位并自愿选择行臀位外倒转术的孕37~40周的368例孕妇的临床资料,按成功与否分为两组。两组均是硬膜外麻醉后在B超监护下行外倒转术。分析年龄、产次、手术孕周、孕前体重指数、宫缩抑制药、新生儿体重、胎盘位置、脐带绕颈、脐带长度、臀先露的类型对臀位外倒转术的影响。结果 (1)硬膜外麻醉下足月臀位外倒转术的成功率为41.30%(152/368),手术成功孕妇的阴道分娩率82.24%(125/152);(2)单因素分析显示,两组孕妇的年龄、孕周、孕前体重指数、脐带绕颈、脐带长度、臀先露的类型比较,差异无统计学意义;两组产次、宫缩抑制药的使用、新生儿体重、胎盘位置的差异具有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,经产(OR=2.485,95%CI:1.499~4.121)、新生儿体重≥3000 g(OR=4.335,95%CI:2.470~7.607)、使用宫缩抑制药(OR=8.183,95%CI:4.668~14.348)是臀位外倒转术成功的独立有利因素。结论 硬膜外麻醉下足月臀位胎儿外倒转术可降低剖宫产率,手术成功的独立有利因素包括产次、使用宫缩抑制药、新生儿体重。
Abstract
Objective To investigate the influencing factors of successful external cephalic version (ECV) for breech presentation at term under epidural anesthesia. Methods The clinical data on 368 cases of singleton pregnant women with breech presentation who had undergone ECV at 37-40 gestational weeks between January 2015 and February 2021 was analyzed retrospectively. According to the outcomes of ECV, these women were divided into the success group and failure group. Both groups received ECV under B-ultrasound monitoring after epidural anesthesia. The maternal age, parity, gestational weeks, maternal body mass index before pregnancy, use of drugs for tocolysis, neonatal weight, placenta positions, umbilical cord entanglement, lengths of umbilical cords, and types of breech presentation on ECV were compared between the two groups. Results (1)The success rate of ECV was 41.30%(152/368), and the vaginal delivery rate in the success group was 82.24%(125/152). (2) Univariate analysis showed that there was no significant difference in age, gestational weeks, maternal body mass indexes before pregnancy, umbilical cord entanglement, umbilical cord lengths, or types of breech presentation between the two groups (P>0.05). However, there was significant difference in parity, use of tocolysis drugs, neonatal weight and placenta positions between the two groups (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis suggested that multiparity (OR=2.485, 95%CI 1.499-4.121), neonatal weight ≥3000 g (OR=4.335, 95%CI 2.470-7.607), use of of tocolysis drugs (OR=8.183,95%CI 4.668-14.348) were independent favorable factors for the success of ECV. Conclusions The application of ECV in pregnant women with breech presentation at term can reduce the rate of cesarean section significantly. The independent influencing factors that contribute to the success of ECV include multiparity, the use of tocolysis drugs, and neonatal weight.
关键词
臀位 /
外倒转术 /
硬膜外麻醉 /
影响因素
Key words
breech /
external cephalic version /
epidural anesthesia /
influencing factors
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Lim S, Lucero J, Lim S, et al. Obstetric and anesthetic approaches to external cephalic version[J]. Anesthesiol Clin, 2017, 35(1): 81-94.
[2] Rodgers R. External cephalic version is associated with a low complication rate[J]. BJOG, 2019, 126(4):500.
[3] 龙俊青, 韦红卫, 夏红卫,等. 足月及近足月外倒转术的成功率及其影响因素分析[J].中华妇产科杂志, 2019, 54(8):516-521.
[4] 李鸿斌,冯海娟,陈继华,等.复苏技术降低中国新生儿窒息发生率和死亡率的系统评价[J].中国循证医学杂志,2016,16(12):1454-1464.
[5] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins Obstetrics. Practice bulletin No. 221: external cephalic version[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2020, 135(5):e203-e212.
[6] Ebner F, Friedl T W, Leinert E, et al. Predictors for a successful external cephalic version: a single centre experience[J].Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2016,293(4):749-755.
[7] Hutton E K, Simioni J C, Thabane L. Predictors of success of external cephalic version and cephalic presentation at birth among 1253 women with non-cephalic presentation using logistic regression and classification tree analyses[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2017, 96(8):1012-1020.
[8] Weill Y, Pollack R N. The efficacy and safety of external cephalic version after a previous caesarean delivery[J]. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 2017, 57(3): 323-326.
[9] Vaz de Macedo C, Clode N, Mendes da Graça L, et al. Prediction of success in external cephalic version under tocolysis: still a challenge [J]. Acta Med Port, 2015, 28(5): 554-558.
[10] Cluver C, Gyte G M, Sinclair M, et al. Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic version[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2015, 9(2) : CD000184.
[11] Trobo D,Pintado P,Ortega V, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes in external cephalic version: prognostic factors for the success of the technique[J]. J Perinat Med, 2019, 47(7):717-723.
[12] Isakov O, Reicher L, Lavie A, et al.Prediction of success in external cephalic version for breech presentation at term[J]. Obstet Gynecol,2019, 133(5):857-866.
[13] Kok M, Van der Steeg J W, Van der Post J A, et al. Prediction of success of external cephalic version after 36 weeks[J].Am J Perinatol, 2011, 28( 2) : 103- 110.
[14] 郝秀兰,白小艺,梅志雄,等. 孕晚期臀位外倒转术的安全性和影响因素的临床分析[J].中山大学学报(医学版), 2018, 39(3):443-447.
[15] Hao Q, Hu Y, Zhang L, et al. A Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials of neuraxial, intravenous, and inhalational anesthesia for external cephalic version [J]. Anesth Analg, 2020, 131(6):1800-1811.
[16] Magro-Malosso E R, Saccone G, Di Tommaso M, et al. Neuraxial analgesia to increase the success rate of external cephalic version: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 215(3): 276-286.
PDF(738 KB)
