输尿管上段嵌顿性结石后腹腔镜下输尿管切开取石术治疗体会

沈学成, 熊朝晖, 赵本隆, 徐明, 魏洋洋, 沈骏超, 潘金生, 董玉茹

武警医学 ›› 2021, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3) : 185-188.

PDF(761 KB)
PDF(761 KB)
武警医学 ›› 2021, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3) : 185-188.
论著

输尿管上段嵌顿性结石后腹腔镜下输尿管切开取石术治疗体会

  • 沈学成1, 熊朝晖1, 赵本隆1, 徐明1, 魏洋洋1, 沈骏超1, 潘金生1, 董玉茹2
作者信息 +

Incarcerated stones in the upper ureter treated with retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterectomy

  • SHEN Xuecheng1, XIONG Zhaohui1, ZHAO Benlong1, XU Ming1, WEI Yangyang1, SHEN Junchao1, PAN Jinsheng1, DONG Yuru2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 探讨嵌顿性输尿管上段结石后腹腔镜下输尿管切开取石术(retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterectomy,RLUL)治疗的安全性和有效性。方法 选取武警安徽总队医院2017-10至2019-12收治的嵌顿性输尿管上段结石122例,随机分为研究组(62例)与对照组(60例)。研究组采取RLUL,对照组采取经皮肾镜取石术(percutaneous nephrolithotomy,PCNL)。比较两组围术期相关指标、清石率及并发症。结果 研究组术中出血量、手术时间、术后住院天数均少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组的结石清除率为100.00%,明显高于对照组(83.33%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组并发症发生率(4.83%) 明显低于对照组(15.00%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 RLUL治疗嵌顿性输尿管上段结石清除率高且创伤小、并发症少,值得临床推广应用。

Abstract

Objective To explore the safety and effectiveness of retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterectomy (RLUL) in the treatment of incarcerated upper ureteral calculi. Methods A total of 122 patients with incarcerated upper ureteral calculi treated in our hospital between October 2017 and December 2019 were selected and randomly divided into the study group(n=62) and control group (n=60). The study group was treated with retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterectomy (RLUL) while the control group underwent adopted percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). The related indicators, stone removal rate and incidence of complications were compared between the two groups during the perioperative period. Results Intraoperative blood loss, duration of surgery and length of hospital stay in the study group were lower or shorter than those of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).The stone removal rate of the study group (100.00%) was significantly higher than that of the control group (83.33%) while the complication rate of the study group (4.83%) was significantly lower than that of the control group (15.00%). Conclusions RLUL is a safe and effective treatment for incarcerated upper ureteral calculi, with less trauma, higher stone removal rate, fewer complications, and quicker postoperative recovery.

关键词

输尿管上段结石 / 腹腔镜 / 输尿管切开

Key words

upper ureteral calculi / retroperitoneal laparoscopy / percutaneous nephroscope / ureterectomy

引用本文

导出引用
沈学成, 熊朝晖, 赵本隆, 徐明, 魏洋洋, 沈骏超, 潘金生, 董玉茹. 输尿管上段嵌顿性结石后腹腔镜下输尿管切开取石术治疗体会[J]. 武警医学. 2021, 32(3): 185-188
SHEN Xuecheng, XIONG Zhaohui, ZHAO Benlong, XU Ming, WEI Yangyang, SHEN Junchao, PAN Jinsheng, DONG Yuru. Incarcerated stones in the upper ureter treated with retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterectomy[J]. Medical Journal of the Chinese People Armed Police Forces. 2021, 32(3): 185-188
中图分类号: R692.4   

参考文献

[1] Neto A C, Korkes J L, Silva I , et al. Prospective randomized study of treatment of large proximal ureteral stones:extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureterolithotripsy versus laparoscopy[J]. J Urolo, 2012,187(1):164-168.
[2] Zhu H,Ye X,Xiao X, et al.Retrograde, antegrade, and laparoscopic approaches to the management of large upper ureteral stones after shockwave lithotripsy failure: a four-year retrospective study[J]. J Endourol, 2014, 28(1):100-103.
[3] Keyi W, Guangchun W, Heng S, et al. Analysis of the clinical effect and long-term follow-up results of retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in the treatment of complicated upper ureteral calculi (report of 206 cases followed for 10 years) [J]. Int Urol Nephrol,2019,51(11):1955-1960.
[4] Tefekli A, Tepeler A, Akman T,et al. The comparison of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and percutaneous nephrolithotomyin the treatment of solitary large renal pelvic stones[J].Urolo Research,2012,40(5):549-555.
[5] 陈孝平,汪建平,赵继宗.外科学[M]. 9 版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2018:558-560.
[6] Wang Y, Zhong B, Yang X, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of URSL, RPLU, and MPCNL for treatment of large upper impacted ureteral stones: a randomized controlled trial[J]. BMC Urol,2017,17(1):50.
[7] Tefekli A, Tepeler A, Akman T,et al. The comparison of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and percutaneous nephrolithotomyin the treatment of solitary large renal pelvic stones[J].Urolo Research,2012,40(5):549-555.
[8] Naghiyev R N, Imamverdiyev S B, Sanli O M, et al. Results of laparoscopic ureterolithotomy depending on the type of laparoscopic approach and location of the stone [J]. Urol,2018,3(1):121-125.
[9] 黄苏溪,袁超英,袁 杰,等.微创经皮肾镜与逆行输尿管软镜治疗1~2 cm肾结石疗效对比[J].武警医学,2020,31(6):523-526.
[10] Volkan T, Berkan R, Selcuk S, et al. Flexible ureteroscopy versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for the treatment of proximal ureteral stones >15 mm: a single surgeon experience [J].Urol Int,2016,96(1):77-82.
[11] Wani M M, Durrani A M. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: experience of 60 cases from a developing world hospital[J]. J Minim Access Surg,2018,15(2):103-108.
[12] Jiang J T, Li W G, Zhu Y P, et al. Comparison of the clinical efficacy and safety of retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy and ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy in the treatment of obstructive upper ureteral calculi with concurrent urinary tract infections[J]. Lasers Med Sci,2016,31(5):915-920.
[13] 舒丙学,疏仁义,黄 进.后腹腔镜下输尿管上段切开取石术的学习曲线[J].现代泌尿外科杂志,2017,22(3):210-212.
[14] Karami H,Javanmard B, Hasanzadeh H,et al.Is it necessary to place a double j catheter after laparoscopic ureterolithotomy? a four-year experience”[J].J Endourol,2012,26(9):1183-1186.
[15] Huan Y, Xiao Y, Ejun P, et al. Urgent laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for proximal ureter stones accompanied with obstructive pyelonephritis: Is it safe and effective without preoperative drainage? [J].Medicine (Baltimore),2017,96(45):e8657.

PDF(761 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/