CT 辅助下软通道引流术治疗脑室出血的有效性及安全性

王小卫, 张婉琼, 王荣辉, 王松, 高海晓, 赵汉清

武警医学 ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (10) : 862-865.

PDF(954 KB)
PDF(954 KB)
武警医学 ›› 2022, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (10) : 862-865.
论著

CT 辅助下软通道引流术治疗脑室出血的有效性及安全性

  • 王小卫1, 张婉琼1, 王荣辉2, 王松1, 高海晓1, 赵汉清3
作者信息 +

Efficacy and safety of CT-assisted soft channel drainage in treatment of ventricular hemorrhage

  • WANG Xiaowei1, ZHANG Wanqiong1, WANG Ronghui2, WANG Song1, GAO Haixiao1, ZHAO Hanqing3
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 探讨CT 辅助下软通道引流术治疗脑室出血(IVH)的有效性及安全性。方法 回顾性分析2017-02至2021-09邢台市第三医院神经外科收治的92例IVH患者的临床资料,根据手术方式不同分为对照组(常规开颅血肿清除术治疗)和观察组(CT 辅助下软通道引流术治疗),每组46例,比较两组的临床治疗效果、手术时间、血肿清除时间、住院时间、术后7 d出血量、血肿清除率及术后不良反应,术后随访6个月,应用日常生活活动评定量表(ADL)、改良Rankin评分量表(mRS),评估患者神经功能恢复程度和近期恢复情况。结果 观察组临床疗效好于对照组(89.13% vs. 71.39%),术后不良反应发生率低于对照组(15.21% vs. 34.78%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组手术时间、血肿清除时间、住院时间均短于对照组,术中出血量及血肿清除率均少于或低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),但两组术后7 d出血量和血肿清除率基本相同,差异无统计学意义。术后6个月观察组mRS评分、ADL评分均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 CT 辅助下软通道引流术治疗IVH效果好,且创伤小、安全性高,可明显改善患者近期预后。

Abstract

Objective To analyze the efficacy and safety of CT-assisted soft channel drainage in the treatment of ventricular hemorrhage (IVH). Methods The clinical medical records of IVH patients who were admitted to the Neurosurgery Department of the Third Hospital of Xingtai City from February 2017 to September 2021, were retrospectively analyzed. According to surgical methods, the patients were divided into group A (n=46, conventional craniotomy for hematoma evacuation) and group B (n=46, CT-assisted soft channel drainage).The clinical treatment effect, operation time, hematoma clearance time, hospital stay, blood loss of 7 days after operation, hematoma clearance rate and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. The patients were followed up for 6 months after the operation, and the activities of daily living (ADL) and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) were used to evaluate the degree of neurological recovery and recent recovery of patients. Results The clinical efficacy of group B was better than that of group A (89.13% vs. 71.39%,P<0.05), the incidence of postoperative complications was lower than that of group A(P<0.05), and the operation time, hematoma removal time and hospital stay in group B were shorter than those in group A(P<0.05),the intraoperative blood loss was less than that of group A (P<0.05);The first hematoma clearance rate was lower than that of group A and there was no significant difference in the hematoma clearance rate between the two groups at the time of extubation; the mRS, ADL score of group B was lower than those of group A (P<0.05). Conclusions CT-assisted soft channel drainage for IVH can achieve good results, with less trauma and high safety, and significantly improves the near-term prognosis of patients.

关键词

脑室出血 / 微创锥颅软通道引流 / 开颅血肿清除术 / 尿激酶 / 临床效果 / 安全性

Key words

intraventricular hemorrhage / minimally invasive cone cranial soft channel drainage / Craniotomy for hematoma evacuation / urokinase / clinical effect / safety

引用本文

导出引用
王小卫, 张婉琼, 王荣辉, 王松, 高海晓, 赵汉清. CT 辅助下软通道引流术治疗脑室出血的有效性及安全性[J]. 武警医学. 2022, 33(10): 862-865
WANG Xiaowei, ZHANG Wanqiong, WANG Ronghui, WANG Song, GAO Haixiao, ZHAO Hanqing. Efficacy and safety of CT-assisted soft channel drainage in treatment of ventricular hemorrhage[J]. Medical Journal of the Chinese People Armed Police Forces. 2022, 33(10): 862-865
中图分类号: R651.1   

参考文献

[1] Bosche B, Mergenthaler P, Doeppner T R, et al. Complex clearance mechanisms after intraventricular hemorrhage and rt-PA Treatment-a review on clinical trials[J]. Transl Stroke Res, 2020, 11(3): 337-344.
[2] 王朝平, 吴 杰, 周 敏, 等. 微创钻孔引流与开颅血肿清除术治疗中老年高血压脑出血的临床疗效及预后比较[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2016, 36(18): 4494-4495.
[3] 孙树平, 石长斌. 自发性脑实质出血继发脑室出血的治疗进展[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志, 2021, 26(11): 891-893.
[4] Baker A D, Rivera P M, Yu Z, et al. Fibrinolytic for treatment of intraventricular hemorrhage: a meta-analysis and systematic review[J]. Int J Stroke, 2018, 13(1): 11-23.
[5] 中华医学会神经病学分会, 中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组. 中国脑出血诊治指南(2014)[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2015, 48(6): 435-445.
[6] 李 佳,杨金亮,杨铁牛, 等. 腰大池引流联合双侧脑室外引流治疗脑室出血的疗效[J]. 安徽医学, 2013, 39(12): 1496-1498.
[7] Solinge T S, Muskens I S, Kavouridis V K, et al. Fibrinolytics and intraventricular hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Neurocrit Care, 2020, 32(1): 262-271.
[8] 黄永福. 脑出血破入脑室的手术治疗进展[J]. 广西中医药大学学报, 2020, 23(2): 78-81.
[9] He C, Yang G, Zhao M, et al. A clinical study of high-dose urokinase for the treatment of the patients with hypertension induced ventricular hemorrhage[J]. Prog Brain Res, 2021, 266: 491-355.
[10] 潘 亮, 夏清岫, 苗志凯, 等. CT引导下立体定向微创引流术治疗高血压脑出血的临床疗效及对神经功能的影响[J]. 中国医学装备, 2020, 17(8): 62-65.
[11] 童婧怡, 陈泰学, 马 琳, 等. 纤溶酶原激活物辅助脑室引流治疗高血压脑出血疗效与安全性的系统评价[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2019, 19(9): 1078-1085.
[12] 周广平, 水 政, 毛玉玲, 等. 开颅血肿清除与微创锥颅软通道外引流治疗高血压脑出血的效果及对血清 Cor、AngⅡ、 NSE、S100β 的影响[J]. 慢性病学杂志, 2021, 22(11): 1634-1637.
[13] StaubB F,Lieshout J H, Beez T, et al. Evaluation of volumetric change of intracerebral hemorrhage in patients treated with thrombolysis for intraventricular hemorrhage[J]. Neurocrit Care, 2021, 34(2): 529-536.
[14] 付怀栋, 刘敏华, 高 攀, 等. 尿激酶冲洗在脑出血微创穿刺引流术中的应用价值[J]. 中国现代应用药学, 2020, 37(22): 2785-2789.
[15] Li M, Mu F, Han Q, et al. Intraventricular fibrinolytic for the treatment of intraventricular hemorrhage: a network meta-analysis[J]. Brain Inj, 2020, 34(7): 864-870.
[16] Han W Y, Tao Y Q, Xu F, et al. The short- and long-term efficacy analysis of stereotactic surgery combined external ventricular drainage in the treatment of the secondary intraventricular hemorrhage[J]. Brain Behav, 2017, 7(12): e00864.

基金

2019年邢台市科学技术局市级科技计划自筹经费项目(2019ZC224),河北省卫生健康委员会重点研发计划项目(18277720)


PDF(954 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/