[1] Fealey M E, Edwards W D, Giannini C, et al. Complications of endovascular polymers associated with vascular introducer sheaths and metallic coils in 3 patients, with literature review [J]. Am J Surg Pathol, 2008, 32(9): 1310-1316.
[2] Shotar E, Law-Ye B, Baronnet-Chauvet F, et al. Non-ischemic cerebral enhancing lesions secondary to endovascular aneurysm therapy: nickel allergy or foreign body reaction? Case series and review of the literature [J]. Neuroradiology, 2016, 58(9): 877-885.
[3] Shotar E, Labeyrie M A, Biondi A, et al. Non-ischemic cerebral enhancing lesions after intracranial aneurysm endovascular repair: a retrospective French National Registry [J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2022, 14(9): 925-930.
[4] Ikemura A, Ishibashi T, Otani K, et al. Delayed leukoencephalopathy: a rare complication after coiling of cerebral aneurysms [J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2020, 41(2): 286-292.
[5] Mehta R I, Mehta R I. Hydrophilic polymer embolism: implications for manufacturing, regulation, and postmarket surveillance of coated intravascular medical devices [J]. J Patient Saf, 2021, 17(8): e1069-e1079.
[6] Moreno Estébanez A, Luna Rodríguez A, Pérez Concha T, et al. Symptomatic intracranial embolic foreign-body reactions after endovascular neurointerventional procedures: a retrospective study in a tertiary hospital [J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2021, 200: 106323.
[7] Bakola E, Katsanos A H, Palaiodimou L, et al. Delayed recurrent enhancing white matter lesions complicating coiling of intracranial aneurysm [J]. Eur J Neurol, 2021, 28(7): 2388-2391.
[8] 梁 骊, 范雪怡, 于 瑾, 等. 颅内血管内治疗术后迟发性非缺血性脑增强病变临床特征分析并文献复习[J]. 中国脑血管病杂志, 2023, 20(3):186-194.
[9] Boyle T, Fernando S L, Steinfort B, et al. Medical treatment of polymeric cerebral granulomatous reactions following endovascular procedures [J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2021, 13(11):1032-1036.
[10] Ulus S, Yakupoglu A, Kararslan E, et al. Reversible intracranial parenchymal changes in MRI after MCA aneurysm treatment with stent-assisted coiling technique; possible nickel allergy [J]. Neuroradiology, 2012, 54(8):897-899.
[11] Murayama Y, Nien Y L, Duckwiler G, et al. Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: 11 years′ experience [J]. J Neurosurg, 2003, 98(5):959-966.
[12] Grewal S S, López Del Valle E M, Gupta V, et al. Neurological changes with abnormal brain reactivity following coiling of cerebral aneurysm. Possible reactivity to endovascular devices and material [J]. J Vasc Interv Neurol, 2015, 8:28-36.
[13] Fanning N F, Willinsky R A, ter Brugge K G. Wall enhancement, edema, and hydrocephalus after endovascular coil occlusion of intradural cerebral aneurysms [J]. J Neurosurg, 2008, 108(6):1074-1086.
[14] Hu Y C, Deshmukh V R, Albuquerque F C, et al. Histopathological assessment of fatal ipsilateral intraparenchymal hemorrhages after the treatment of supraclinoid aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device [J]. J Neurosurg, 2014, 120(2): 365-374.
[15] Barnwell S L, D′Agostino A N, Shapiro S L, et al. Foreign bodies in small arteries after use of an infusión microcatheter [J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 1997, 18 (10):1886-1889.
[16] Mehta R I,Mehta R I. Polymer-induced central nervous system complications following vascular procedures: spectrum of iatrogenic injuries and review of outcomes [J]. Hum Pathol, 2016, 53:178-190.
[17] Zellner C, Ports T A, Yeghiazarians Y, et al. Sterile radial artery granuloma after transradial procedures: a unique and avoidable complication [J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2010, 76 (5):673-676.
[18] Geisbush T R, Marks M P, Heit J J. Cerebral foreign body reaction due to hydrophilic polymer embolization following aneurysm treatment by pipeline flow diversion device [J]. Interv Neuroradiol, 2019, 25 (4):447-453.
[19] Shapiro M, Ollenschleger M D, Baccin C, et al. Foreign body emboli following cerebrovascular interventions: clinical, radiographic, and histopathologic features [J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2015, 36(11):2121-2126.