峡部植骨联合短期钉棒固定治疗腰椎峡部裂的临床效果

雷鸣, 魏新辉, 叶青, 蓝育新, 刘唐誉, 苏畅, 黄晓诞

武警医学 ›› 2024, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3) : 214-217.

PDF(1003 KB)
PDF(1003 KB)
武警医学 ›› 2024, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3) : 214-217.
论著

峡部植骨联合短期钉棒固定治疗腰椎峡部裂的临床效果

  • 雷鸣1, 魏新辉2, 叶青1, 蓝育新1, 刘唐誉1, 苏畅1, 黄晓诞1
作者信息 +

Analysis of curative effect of isthmus bone grafting combined with short-term nail and rod fixation in treatment of lumbar spondylolysis

  • LEI Ming1, WEI Xinhui2, YE Qing1, LAN Yuxin1, LIU Tangyu1, SU Chang1, HUANG Xiaodan1
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 探讨峡部植骨+短期钉棒固定治疗腰椎峡部裂患者的临床效果。方法 针对2010-01至2022-12在武警广西总队医院脊柱外科接受治疗的173例腰椎峡部裂患者临床资料进行回顾性分析,按照患者的治疗方法划分为对照组(峡部植骨+U形钛棒固定,n=55)与研究组(峡部植骨+短期钉棒固定,n=118),比较手术完成情况、疼痛与腰椎功能、腰椎间盘退变情况以及峡部骨性愈合情况。结果 两组患者性别、年龄、手术时间、术中出血量比较无统计学差异。研究组峡部愈合时间[(10.65±0.68)月]短于对照组[(13.40±1.16)月],研究组住院时间[(14.43±2.32)d]短于对照组[(16.51±2.81)d],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。手术后两组VAS、ODI评分均显著降低,但两组差异无统计意义。研究组峡部不愈合率为6.78%,低于对照组的20.34%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=8.298,P<0.05)。研究组临近椎间盘退变率为2.54%,虽低于对照组的5.45%,但差异无统计学意义。结论 腰椎峡部裂患者实施峡部植骨联合短期钉棒固定治疗,可缓解疼痛和腰椎功能障碍,峡部骨性融合效果良好,同时可于峡部愈合后取出临时固定装置,最大程度降低邻近椎间盘退变风险。

Abstract

Objective To observe and analyze the clinical effect of isthmus bone grafting combined with short-term nail and rod fixation in the treatment of lumbar spondylolysis. Methods Basic data of 173 patients with lumbar spondylolysis admitted to the Department of Spinal Surgery of Guangxi Autonomous Regional Corps Hospital of Chinese People’ s Armed Police Force from January 2010 to December 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the treatment methods, the patients were divided into reference group (isthmus bone graft +U-shaped titanium rod fixation, n=55) and study group (isthmus bone graft+short-term nail and rod fixation, n=118), and the operation completion, pain and lumbar function, lumbar disc degeneration and isthmus bone healing were compared. Result There was no statistical difference in sex, age, operation time or intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P>0.05).The isthmus healing time in the study group [(10.65±0.68) months] was shorter than that in the reference group [(13.40±1.16) months], and the hospitalization time in the study group [(14.43±2.32) d] was shorter than that in the reference group [(16.51±2.81) d], with statistical significance (P<0.05). After operation, the scores of VAS and ODI in the two groups decreased significantly, but there was no statistical value (P>0.05). The rate of isthmus nonunion in the study group was 6.78%, which was lower than that in the reference group (20.34%), and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=8.298,P<0.05). The degeneration rate of adjacent intervertebral disc in the study group was 2.54%, which was slightly lower than that in the reference group (5.45%), and the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusions For patients with lumbar spondylolysis, isthmus bone grafting combined with short-term nail and rod fixation can effectively relieve patients’ pain and lumbar dysfunction, showing a good isthmus bone fusion effect. At the same time, temporary fixation devices can be taken out after isthmus healing, which minimizes the risk of degeneration of adjacent intervertebral discs.

关键词

峡部植骨 / 短期钉棒固定治疗 / 腰椎峡部裂 / 临床疗效

Key words

isthmus bone grafting / short-term nail and rod fixation / lumbar spondylolysis / clinical efficacy

引用本文

导出引用
雷鸣, 魏新辉, 叶青, 蓝育新, 刘唐誉, 苏畅, 黄晓诞. 峡部植骨联合短期钉棒固定治疗腰椎峡部裂的临床效果[J]. 武警医学. 2024, 35(3): 214-217
LEI Ming, WEI Xinhui, YE Qing, LAN Yuxin, LIU Tangyu, SU Chang, HUANG Xiaodan. Analysis of curative effect of isthmus bone grafting combined with short-term nail and rod fixation in treatment of lumbar spondylolysis[J]. Medical Journal of the Chinese People Armed Police Forces. 2024, 35(3): 214-217
中图分类号: R687.3   

参考文献

[1] 朱玲新,杨海涵,王云阁.透视引导下小关节注射治疗症状性腰椎峡部裂的疗效和预后因素分析[J].颈腰痛杂志,2023,44(2):250-252.
[2] 蓝 云,张建政,孙天胜.腰椎后路峡部植骨钉棒系统固定治疗青年腰椎双侧峡部裂疗效分析[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2019,29(8):712-716.
[3] Choi J H, Ochoa J K, Lubinus A, et al. Management of lumbar spondylolysis in the adolescent athlete: a review of over 200 cases[J]. Spine J, 2022, 22(10):1628-1633.
[4] Muthiah N, Ozpinar A, Eubanks J, et al. Direct pars repair with cannulated screws in adults: a case series and systematic literature review[J].World Neurosurgery, 2022,163:E263- E274.
[5] 汪大伟,王华东,李 利,等.两种内固定系统治疗腰椎峡部裂伴轻度滑脱的疗效分析[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2022,32(10):911-918.
[6] 金新蒙,周文超,徐 波,等.峡部螺钉联合非融合椎弓钉固定腰椎峡部裂[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2022,30(19):1802-1805.
[7] 陈勇喜,覃海飚,农必华,等.镜下植骨椎弓根钉固定治疗腰椎峡部裂[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2021,29(10):933-935.
[8] 黄云飞,刘继军,郭 磊,等.采用临时短节段椎弓根螺钉固定联合髂骨植骨治疗青少年腰椎椎弓崩裂症的临床观察[J].骨科临床与研究杂志,2021,6(1):13-19.
[9] 程 刚,杨小玲,魏思奇.单纯腰椎峡部裂的治疗进展[J].医学综述,2022,28(5):980-984.
[10] Ye Y, Jin S, Zou Y, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of lumbar spondylolysis repair with various xation options: a nite element analysis[J]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2022, 10: 1024159.
[11] Li L, Jiang S, Zhao J, et al. Comparison of two internal fixation systems in lumbar spondylolysis by finite element methods[J]. Comput Methods Programs Biomed, 2022, 218: 106713.
[12] Goetzinger S, Courtney S, Yee K, et al. Spondylolysis in young athletes: an overview emphasizing nonoperative management[J]. J Sports Med (Hindawi Publ Corp), 2020: 9235958.
[13] 程 刚,杨小玲,魏思奇.单纯腰椎峡部裂的治疗进展[J].医学综述,2022,28(5):980-984.
[14] 沈 彬,潘福敏,周宁峰,等.节段内修复手术治疗腰椎峡部裂及轻度峡部裂性滑脱的疗效分析[J]. 颈腰痛杂志, 2016, 37(5):361-364.
[15] 石学文,张 涛,甄 平,等.青少年腰椎峡部裂的致病因素及治疗进展[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2021,29(1):60-63.
[16] 陈 峰,滕乐群,秦永超,等.单纯腰椎峡部裂的治疗进展[J].中华骨与关节外科杂志,2019,12(10):816-820.
[17] 张 涛,屈 涛,刘 华,等.Wiltse入路椎弓根钉-椎板钩内固定联合自体髂骨移植修复单节段腰椎峡部裂疗效分析[J].解放军医学杂志,2020,45(7):761-766.
[18] 闫 鹏,刘金辉,崔京福,等.钉棒系统固定结合峡部植骨融合治疗青少年腰椎峡部裂远期疗效[J].中国骨伤,2019,32(12):1156-1159.
[19] 蔡芝军,何晓清,浦路桥,等.双侧腰椎峡部裂钉-钩-棒固定联合植骨术[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2021,29(23):2186-2189.
[20] 陈德元,刘永恒,黄福立.椎弓根钉棒系统内固定结合自体髂骨植骨治疗青年腰椎峡部裂[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2021,36(5): 491-493.

PDF(1003 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/