目的 以定量CT(QCT)测量胸腰椎椎体骨密度值为标准,验证双层探测器光谱CT能谱衰减曲线斜率评价椎体骨密度值的可行性。方法 收集2023-07至2023-12在解放军总医院海南医院放射诊断科行胸部CT检查的患者128例为研究对象,测量T11、T12及L1椎体骨松质QCT值,用40 keV及70 keV能级水平图像CT值的差值与能级水平差值的比值量化能谱衰减曲线;利用Person相关系数法分析患者QCT值及能谱衰减曲线斜率λ值一致性,绘制ROC曲线,分析能谱衰减曲线斜率诊断骨量减低及骨质疏松的效能。结果 T11、T12、L1椎体及总体QCT值的平均值分别为(137.66±34.01)、(132.74±31.62)、(126.72±31.38)及(132.27±32.35)mg/cm3;λ值的平均值分别为(6.71±1.57)、(6.37±1.63)、(6.27±1.54)及(6.45±1.59)Hu/kev;T11、T12、L1椎体及总体QCT值与λ值相关系数r值分别为0.931、0.943、0.943及0.938,均具有优异的一致性,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);T11、T12及L1椎体男性组QCT值均高于女性组,T12及L1椎体男性组λ值高于女性组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);T11、T12及L1椎体中年组QCT值与λ值均高于老年组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);以QCT值120 mg/cm3分组,λ值诊断椎体是否骨量减低时AUC值0.978,约登指数0.8678,λ值截断值5.90,此时敏感度92.13%,特异度94.66%;以QCT值80 mg/cm3分组,λ值诊断椎体是否为骨质疏松时AUC值0.965,约登指数0.8662,λ值截断值4.90,敏感度89.40%,特异度97.22%。结论 双层探测器光谱CT能谱衰减曲线斜率具有用于评价胸腰椎椎体骨密度值的潜力,在临床常规中具有可行性。
Abstract
Objective To verify the feasibility of evaluating vertebral bone mineral density by using quantitative CT (QCT) to measure the bone mineral density (BMD) of thoracolumbar vertebrae, and the slope of spectral CT attenuation curve with double-layer detector. Methods A total of 128 patients who underwent chest CT examination in the Department of Radiology, Hainan Hospital of PLA General Hospital from July 2019 to December 2019 were collected, and the QCT values of bone cancelation in thoracic 11, thoracic 12 and lumbar 1 vertebrae were measured. The attenuation curve of energy spectrum was quantified by the ratio between the difference of CT values of 40 Kev and 70 Kev level images and the difference of energy level. Person correlation coefficient method was used to analyze the consistency of QCT value and λ value of slope of energy spectrum decay curve of patients, and ROC curve was drawn to analyze the efficacy of slope of energy spectrum decay curve in diagnosing bone mass loss and osteoporosis. Results The average QCT values in thoracic 11,thoracic 12,lumbar 1 vertebra and the whole body were (137.66±34.01) (132.74±31.62) (126.72±31.38) and (132.27±32.35) mg/cm3, respectively, The average λ values were (6.71±1.57) (6.37±1.63) (6.27±1.54) and (6.45±1.59) Hu/kev, respectively. The correlation coefficient r values of thoracic 11, thoracic 12, lumbar 1 and the total QCT value and λ value were 0.931,0.943,0.943 and 0.938, respectively, with excellent consistency and statistical significance(P<0.05). The QCT value of thoracic 11,thoracic 12 and lumbar 1 vertebra in male groups was higher than that of female group, the λ value of thoracic 12 and lumbar 1 vertebra in male group was higher than that of female group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). The QCT value and λ value of thoracic 11,thoracic 12 and lumbar 1 vertebra in the middle age group were higher than those in the elderly group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). With QCT value of 120 mg/cm3, λ value of AUC value of 0.978, Jordon index of 0.8678, λ value of cutoff value of 5.90, sensitivity of 92.13%, specificity of 94.66% when diagnosing vertebrae with low bone mass. The patients were grouped with a QCT value of 80 mg/cm3. The ACU value was 0.965, the Jorden index was 0.8662, λ cutoff value was 4.90, sensitivity was 89.40%, and specificity was 97.22% when the vertebrae were diagnosed with osteoporosis. Conclusions The slope of spectral CT attenuation curve with double-layer detector has the potential to evaluate the BMD of thoracolumbar vertebrae, and is feasible in clinical practice.
关键词
光谱CT /
能谱衰减曲线 /
定量CT /
骨密度
Key words
spectral CT /
energy spectrum attenuation curve /
quantitative CT /
bone mineral density
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 《中国老年骨质疏松症诊疗指南(2023)》工作组, 中国老年学和老年医学学会骨质疏松分会, 中国医疗保健国际交流促进会骨质疏松病学分会,等.中国老年骨质疏松症诊疗指南(2023)[J].中华骨与关节外科杂志, 2023,16(10):865-885.
[2] 程晓光,徐文坚,吴 艳,等.骨质疏松的影像学与骨密度诊断专家共识[J].中国骨质疏松杂志, 2020,26(9):1249-1256.
[3] 王 平,和建伟,黄 刚,等.应用双能CT与定量CT对椎体骨密度测量的对照研究[J].中国骨质疏松杂志, 2017,23(2):159-162.
[4] 王 玲,袁慧书,程晓光.积极推进定量CT的临床应用[J].中华放射学杂志, 2021,55(4):337-339.
[5] 邓闽军,孙振国,翁 伟,等.腰椎定量CT在合并脊柱侧弯的骨质疏松性骨折行椎体成形术的应用价值[J]. 中国骨伤,2021,34(11):1077-1082.
[6] 尤 涛,温鑫鑫.定量CT在评估骨强度领域的应用研究进展[J].中华保健医学杂志, 2018,20(3):266-268.
[7] 程晓光,王 亮,曾 强,等.中国定量CT(QCT)骨质疏松症诊断指南(2018)[J].中国骨质疏松杂志, 2019,25(6):733-737.
[8] 程晓光,闫 东,周凤云.光谱CT在骨科的研究现状与展望[J].中国骨与关节杂志,2021,10(11):801-805.
[9] 吕 登,望 云,刘士远.光谱CT在检测骨骼肌肉系统疾病中的临床应用[J].医学影像学杂志, 2023,33(3):509-512.
[10] 中华医学会放射学分会,中国医师协会放射医师分会,安徽省影像临床医学研究中心.能量CT临床应用中国专家共识[J].中华放射学杂志,2022,56(5):476-487.
[11] Van Hamersvelt R W, Schilham A M R, Engelke K,et al. Accuracy of bone mineral density quantification using dual-layer spectral detector CT: a phantom study[J]. Eur Radiol, 2017,27(10):1-9.
[12] Engelke K.Quantitative computed tomography-current status and new developments[J].J Clin Densitom, 2017,20(3):309-321.
[13] 刘 斋,高志梅,雷立存,等.双能CT能谱曲线及骨钙CT值对骨质疏松的诊断价值[J].中国医学影像学杂志, 2020,28(4):290-293.
[14] 刘梦珂,秦 健,李长勤.CT及MRI对骨质疏松的定量研究进展[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2020,28(21):1972-1975.
[15] Sebastian E.Assessment of quantification accuracy and image quality of a full-body dual-layer spectral CT system[J].J Appl Clin Med Phys,2018,19(1):204-217.
[16] Rassouli N,Etesami M,Dhanantwari A,et al.Detector-based spectral CT with a novel dual-layer technology: principles and applications[J].Insights Imaging,2017,8(6):589-598.
[17] 罗春材,李 涛,杨 立.双层探测器光谱CT的特点及临床应用[J].中国医疗设备,2021,36(7):170-173.
[18] Hedent S V,Su K H, Jordan D W,et al.Improving bone mineral density assessment using spectral detector CT - science direct[J].J Clin Densitom,2019,22(3):374-381.
[19] 王文章,麦春华,许东峰,等.椎体CT值、有效原子系数对腰椎骨密度的评估价值[J].中国CT和MRI杂志, 2023,21(06):170-171,183.
[20] Laugerette A,Schwaiger B J,Brown K,et al. DXA-equivalent quantification of bone mineral density using dual-layer spectral CT scout scans[J].Eur Radiol,2019,29(9):4624-4634.
[21] 周凤云,闫 东,王 玲,等.腰椎体积CT值对诊断骨质疏松症的应用价值[J].中国骨质疏松杂志, 2023,29(9):1272-1277.
[22] 刘正华,张玉婷,黄大耿,等.双能量CT虚拟去钙技术评价骨质疏松症的价值[J].国际医学放射学杂志, 2021,44(5):556-560.
[23] 蹇新梅,宋玲玲,杜 霞,等.定量CT(QCT)测定健康体检者胸腰椎骨密度分布规律及其相关性[J].中国骨质疏松杂志, 2021,27(10):1499-1502.
[24] 高 冰,张 源,黄世豪,等.低剂量定量CT测量不同体质量指数人群腰椎骨密度的准确性[J].中国医学影像技术, 2021,37(9):1401-1404.
基金
国家重点研发计划项目(2020YFC2004900)