目的 比较腹腔镜下经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术(transabdominal preperito-neal,TAPP)与无张力腹股沟疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床效果。方法 选取2021-01至2024-09武警安徽总队医院普通外科收治的腹股沟疝患者53例,依据手术方式分为观察组(25例,实施TAPP)与对照组(28例,实施无张力腹股沟疝修补术)。对比两组一般情况、并发症、对侧疝再发情况及术后恢复情况。结果 两组年龄、疝的位置、手术时间比较,差异无统计学意义。观察组术中出血量(5.60±2.78)ml,低于对照组的(10.36±3.83)ml,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组住院时间(10.38±1.33)d,短于对照组的(13.56±2.94)d,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组首次下床时间(18.23±3.90)h,短于对照组的(22.17±4.72)h,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组术后6 h VAS评分(3.85±0.80)分,低于对照组的(4.72±0.57)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组术后12、24、72 h VAS评分与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义。观察组并发症发生率低于对照组(4% vs. 25%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组对侧疝再发率高于对照组,但差异无统计学意义。观察组术后1、3、6个月局部异物感发生率均低于对照组(8% vs. 39.29%,0% vs. 17.86%,0% vs. 3.57%),其中两组术后1个月、3个月比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组术后1个月、3个月无法耐受轻体力活动发生率均低于对照组(8% vs. 32.14%,4% vs. 10.17%),其中术后1个月两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组术后6个月均能耐受轻体力活动;两组术后1个月均未进行重体力活动,观察组术后3个月、6个月无法耐受重体力活动发生率均低于对照组(4% vs. 21.43%,0 vs. 7.14%),但差异无统计学意义。结论 无张力腹股沟疝修补术、TAPP在腹股沟疝治疗中均具有良好疗效,但TAPP对患者损伤小,出血量少,疼痛轻微,并发症少,且恢复更快。
Abstract
Objective To compare the clinical effects of transabdominal preperitoneal(TAPP) laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and tension-free inguinal hernia repair in the treatment of inguinal hernia. Methods A total of 53 patients with inguinal hernia admitted to Anhui Provincial Corps Hospital of Chinese People’s Armed Police Force from January 2021 to September 2024 were enrolled and divided into an observation group (25 cases, undergoing TAPP) and a control group (28 cases, undergoing tension-free inguinal hernia repair). General conditions, complications, recurrence of contralateral hernia, and postoperative recovery of the two groups were compared. Results There were no statistically significant differences in age, hernia location, or operation time between the two groups. However, the observation group experienced significantly less intraoperative blood loss[(5.60±2.78) ml vs. (10.36±3.83) ml, P<0.05], shorter hospital stay (10.38±1.33)d vs. (13.56±2.94)d, P<0.05), and earlier postoperative ambulation [(18.23±3.90)h vs. (22.17±4.72) h,P<0.05]. The visual analogue scale(VAS) score of 6 hours postoperatively was significantly lower in the observation group (3.85±0.80) than in the control group (4.72±0.57),P<0.05. VAS scores of 12, 24, and 72 hours postoperatively were not significantly different between the groups. The incidence of postoperative complications was significantly lower in the observation group compared to the control group (4% vs. 25%), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The observation group had a higher recurrence rate of contralateral hernia, , but the difference was not statistically significant . The incidence of local foreign body sensation at 1 month and 3 months postoperatively was significantly lower in the observation group (8% vs. 39.29% at 1 month; 0% vs. 17.86% at 3 months, P<0.05 for both). By 6 months, the difference was not statistically significant. The incidence of inability to tolerate light physical activity at 1 month and 3 months after surgery was lower than that in the control group (8% vs. 32.14%, 4% vs. 10.17%), and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The incidence of inability to tolerate heavy physical activity in the observation group at 1 month and 3 months after surgery was lower than that in the control group (4% vs. 21.43%, 0 vs. 7.14%), but the differences were not statistically significant. At 6 months after surgery, both groups were able to tolerate light physical activity; the observation group had no heavy physical activity at 1 month after surgery, and the incidence of inability to tolerate heavy physical activity at 3 and 6 months after surgery was lower than that in the control group (4% vs. 21.43%, 0 vs. 7.14%), but the differences were not statistically significant. Conclusions Tension-free inguinal hernia repair and TAPP repair both demonstrate good therapeutic effects in the treatment of inguinal hernia. However, TAPP causes less damage, less blood loss, less pain, fewer complications, and a more rapid recovery.
关键词
腹股沟疝 /
腹股沟疝修补术 /
腹腔镜下经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术 /
并发症
Key words
inguinal hernia /
inguinal hernia repair /
laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair /
complication
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科专家工作组,中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组,陈双,等.腹股沟疝诊疗指南(2024版)[J].中国普通外科杂志,2025,34(3):409-417.
[2] Hernia Surge Group.International guidelines for groin herniamanagement[J].Hernia,2018, 22(1):1-165.
[3] 聂 勇,王晓瑾,常浩生,等.武警官兵腹股沟疝修补术不同术式应用的回顾性研究[J].武警医学,2018,29(11):1032-1035.
[4] 曹 亮,王步云.对比分析开放式无张力疝修补术与腹腔镜疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的临床疗效[J].贵州医药,2020,44(3):410-412.
[5] 中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组,中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会.成人腹股沟疝诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2018,21(7):721-724.
[6] 孙艳军,龚仁华,钟兴国,等.耻骨肌孔解剖结构对腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的意义[J].武警医学,2016,27(12):1193-1195.
[7] 中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组.青年腹股沟疝诊断和治疗中国专家共识(2020版)[J].中国实用外科杂志,2020,40(7):754-757.
[8] 陈 双,李英儒.简化腹腔镜腹股沟区手术解剖的临床意义[J].中华消化外科杂志,2020,19(7):729-732.
[9] McBee P J,Walters R W,Fitzgibbons R J.Current status of inguinal hernia management: a review[J].Int J Abdom Wall Hernia Surg,2022,5(4):159-164.
[10] 赵艳丽,葛 玮,徐会俭.成人腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术和开放式腹股沟疝修补术的临床效果分析[J].中外医疗,2023,42(13):59-62,67.
[11] 吴国龙,丁云飞,郭丙坤,等.腹股沟疝术后慢性疼痛发生情况及其神经因素分析[J].临床外科杂志,2025,33(2):171-174.
[12] 陈 双,周太成.组织缝合修补和补片修补的利弊再认识[J].中国实用外科杂志,2017,37(11):1227-1230.
[13] 高大爽,项本宏.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的临床疗效及术后并发症的危险因素分析[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2020,25(7):492-496,500.
[14] 聂 勇,黄建峰,靳继韬,等.腹腔镜下修补腹股沟斜疝补片3种固定方式效果探讨[J].武警医学,2020,31(10):846-848,852.
[15] 朱同恩,龚道军,宗 科.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后血清肿的风险因素分析[J].浙江临床医学,2025,27(2):190-192,196.
[16] Restrepo B,Cardona M W.Antisperm antibodies and fertility association[J].Actas Urol Esp,2013,37(9):571-578.
[17] Almutairi H,Alshammari R S,Alharbi M J,et al.Laparoscopic management of inguinal hernia: a systematic review and updated network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J].Cureus,2024,16(2):e54192.
[18] 王龙辉,孙国志,梁国刚,等.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术对青年患者睾丸血管及生殖功能的影响[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2024,29(7):521-525.
[19] 张美英.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术对腹股沟疝患者术后恢复、凝血功能及男性性功能的影响[J].中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版),2021,15(3):228-232.
[20] 严秋亮,刘 栋,张 凯,等.经腹腹膜前腹腔镜疝修补术在双侧腹股沟疝中的应用[J].浙江临床医学,2017,19(1):105-106.
[21] 韩 华,李 洲,卢 通.不同TAPP术治疗巨大腹股沟疝的疗效及对应激反应术后并发症的影响[J].河北医学,2024,30(6):964-969.
[22] 马慧发,王劭炜,杨士民.单侧腹股沟斜疝患者行腹腔镜经腹膜前横断疝囊法术后并发血清肿的危险因素分析[J].中国中西医结合外科杂志,2023,29(2):221-225.