目的 比较加速康复外科(ERAS)联合绿色通道模式与常规急诊处置流程提升急诊断指再植救治的时效。方法 选择海军第971医院2021-01至2022-12急诊断指再植(非全身麻醉)患者80例,随机分为绿色通道组和常规组,每组40例。绿色通道组入院后经ERAS联合绿色通道模式救治至手术结束,常规组经急诊采用常规救治模式。观察两组术前准备时间(接诊至手术开始),接诊时(T0)、术前准备时(T1)、麻醉时(T2)不同时点的生命体征及疼痛评分,以及再植成活情况及术后并发症。结果 绿色通道组术前准备时间(101.75±28.79)min,短于常规组的(142.13±41.24)min,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);绿色通道组T2时点VAS疼痛评分低于常规组[(4.23±1.31)vs.(6.63±1.63)];绿色通道组T1、T2时点收缩压以及舒张压均低于常规组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);其余各时点两组血氧、心率差异无统计学意义。两组再植成活率与术后并发症比较,差异无统计学意义。结论 ERAS联合绿色通道模式能够提高急诊断指再植患者救治时效,减轻麻醉疼痛,使围手术期血压更加平稳。
Abstract
Objective To compare the improvement of the timeliness of emergency replantation treatment of severed fingers by enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS)combined with green channel model and conventional emergency treatment procedure. Methods A total of 80 patients who underwent severed finger replantation in No.971 Hospital of PLA Navy from 2021 to 2022 were selected,and randomly divided into green channel group and conventional group,with 40 cases in each group. After admission,the green channel group was treated by ERAS combined with green channel mode until the end of surgery, while the s conventional group was treated with conventional mode in the emergency department. The preoperative preparation time(from admission to beginning of operation),vital signs and visual analogue scale(VAS)at different time points during perioperative period including receiving(T0), preoperative preparation(T1), anaesthesia(T2) were observed in the two groups,and the successful replantation rate and postoperative complications were also documented. Results The preoperative preparation time of the green channel group [(101.75±28.79) min] was shorter than that of the conventional group(142.13 ± 41.24)minutes,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). The VAS pain score of the green channel group at time point T2(4.23 ± 1.31)was lower than that of the control group(6.63 ± 1.63). The systolic and diastolic blood pressures at time points T1 and T2 in the green channel group were both lower than those in the conventional group, with significant differences(P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in blood oxygen saturation and heart rate between the two groups at other time point. The successful replantation rate and postoperative complications between 2 groups showed no statistical difference. Conclusion ERAS combined with green channel model can improve the treatment timeliness of emergency patients with severed finger replantation,reduce the pain of patients during anesthesia,and make the perioperative blood pressure more stable.
关键词
急诊 /
绿色通道 /
麻醉 /
断指再植
Key words
emergency department /
green channel /
anesthesia /
replantation of severed finger
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Chung K C,Yoon A P,Malay S,et al.Patient-reported and functional outcomes after revision amputation and replantation of digot amputations:the franchise multicenter international retrospective cohort study[J]JAMA Surg,2019,154(7):1-10.
[2] Shaterian A,Sayadi L R,Tiourin E,et al.Predictors of hand function following digit replantation:Quantitative review and meta-analysis[J].Hand(NY),2019,4(2):1-7.
[3] 中华医学会.临床诊疗指南.手外科学分册[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2006.
[4] 王训文. 绿色通道在抢救急性心肌梗死急诊冠脉介入治疗护理中的应用及对血清肌红蛋白检验的影响分析[J].医学理论与实践,2018,31(2):272-274.
[5] 任端. 绿色通道流程信息化管理对急诊科患者抢救效果及护理满意度的影响[J].微量元素与健康研究,2022,11(6):74-76.
[6] 孟泽祖,鲜航,侯晓进,等.断指再植术后血管危象相关危险因素[J].昆明医科大学学报,2021,42(1):130-134.
[7] 梁庆晨,孙凤龙,郭恒冰,等.加速康复外科在胫骨高位截骨术中的应用效果[J].实用骨科杂志,2023,29(5):460-464.
[8] 王玲,李美玲,朱宇.布托啡诺鼻喷剂用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术预防性镇痛的临床研究[J].医药论坛杂志,2023,44(4):73-77.
[9] 杨辉,娄春艳,曾华北.酒石酸布托啡诺鼻喷剂在腹腔镜手术术后镇痛应用[J].临床用药论坛,2020,6(3):73-75.
[10] Kashyap K,Shukla R.Drug delivery and targeting to the brain through nasal route:mechanisms,applications and 时901.
[11] 李霞,张志业,初丽丽等.酒石酸布托啡诺对晚期鼻咽癌患者的镇痛效果观察[J].潍坊医学院学报,2022,44(8):21-23.
[12] 赵雾卿,李方,赵赟博,等.酒石酸布托啡诺鼻喷剂治疗252例癌痛患者临床疗效观察[J].中国肿瘤临床,2009,36(9):497-499.
[13] 黄欣,胡建斌.急诊绿色通道与同期常规急诊处置治疗胫腓骨开放骨折的疗效比较[J].吉林医学,2022,43(8):2058-2060.
[14] 张敏,张富杰, 谭会领,等.加速康复外科在腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者中的应用[J].河北医科大学学报,2023,44(5):589-595.
[15] 王冰,沈洁.右美托咪定滴鼻在麻醉中的应用进展[J].中国医师进修杂志,2018,41(6):569-572.
基金
青岛市2021年度医药卫生科研计划项目(2020-WJZD238)