颅内压监测联合脑室外引流对双侧额叶脑挫裂伤患者去骨瓣减压术后治疗的价值

阚松松, 屈星怡, 饶士涛, 孙报增, 许鹏亮, 余超

武警医学 ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (6) : 491-495.

PDF(2101 KB)
PDF(2101 KB)
武警医学 ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (6) : 491-495.
论著

颅内压监测联合脑室外引流对双侧额叶脑挫裂伤患者去骨瓣减压术后治疗的价值

  • 阚松松, 屈星怡, 饶士涛, 孙报增, 许鹏亮, 余超
作者信息 +

Value of intracranial pressure monitoring combined with external ventricular drainage in the treatment of patients with bilateral frontal cerebral contusion after decompressive craniectomy

  • KAN Songsong, QU Xingyi, Rao Shitao, SUN Baozeng, XU Pengliang, YU Chao
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 探讨颅内压监测联合脑室外引流在双侧额叶脑挫裂伤患者去骨瓣减压术后治疗的价值。方法 对2012-01至2023-12在武警江西总队医院接受双额去骨瓣减压术治疗的42例患者的临床资料进行总结,依据是否行颅内压监测,将患者分为监测组(n=21)和对照组(n=21)。对不同时间点的颅内压变化、甘露醇使用情况、恢复情况、并发症进行比较。结果 监测组和对照组患者术后48 h内颅内压[(35.25±3.30)mmHg vs.(35.33±2.52)mmHg],差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);监测组术后72 h、96 h颅内压[(27.50±4.04)mmHg,(21.00±3.16)mmHg]明显低于对照组[(32.00±3.61)mmHg,(29.00±4.58)mmHg](P<0.05);监测组术后甘露醇使用量、使用时间[(1498.57±442.13)ml;(12.86±4.16)d]明显少于对照组[(3362.14±417.79)ml,(26.76±4.60)d](P<0.05);监测组并发症脑疝发生率明显低于对照组(4.76% vs. 28.57%;P<0.05);术后6个月,监测组恢复良好比例明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 颅内压监测联合脑室外引流能减少甘露醇用量及使用时间,降低并发症发生率,改善预后。

Abstract

Objective To explore the application of intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring combined with external ventricular drainage (EVD) in the treatment of patients with bilateral frontal cerebral contusion after decompressive craniectomy. Methods The clinical data of 42 patients who underwent bilateral decompressive craniectomy treatment at Jiangxi Provincial Corps Hospital of Chinese People’s Armed Police Force from January 2012 to December 2023 were summarized. Based on whether they received ICP monitoring during the operation,the patients were divided into a detection group (n=21) and a control group (n=21). The changes in intracranial pressure at different time points, the use of mannitol, recovery status, and complications were compared. Results The intracranial pressure within 48 hours after operation in the detection group and the control group were [(35.25±3.30)mmHg vs. (35.33±2.52)mmHg], respectively, and there was no significant difference in the above changes (P>0.05). The intracranial pressures at 72 h and 96 h after operation in the detection group [(27.50±4.04) mmHg and (21.00±3.16) mmHg)] were significantly lower than that in the control group [(32.00±3.61)mmHg,(29.00±4.58)mmHg](P<0.05). The dosage and duration of postoperative mannitol in the detection group [(1498.57±442.13)ml; (12.86±4.16)d)] were significantly less than those in the control group [(3362.14±417.79)ml,(26.76±4.60)d](P<0.05). The incidence of cerebral hernia in the detection group was significantly lower than that in the control group (4.76% vs. 28.57%; P<0.05).At six months after operation,the proportion of good recovery in the detection group was significantly higher than that in control group (P < 0.05). Conclusions ICP monitoring combined with EVD can reduce the consumption and duration of mannitol, decrease the rate of complication, and improve the prognosis of patients.

关键词

双侧额叶脑挫裂伤 / 去骨瓣减压术 / 颅内压监测 / 脑室外引流

Key words

bilateral frontal cerebral contusion / decompressive craniectomy / intracranial pressure monitoring / external ventricular drainage

引用本文

导出引用
阚松松, 屈星怡, 饶士涛, 孙报增, 许鹏亮, 余超. 颅内压监测联合脑室外引流对双侧额叶脑挫裂伤患者去骨瓣减压术后治疗的价值[J]. 武警医学. 2025, 36(6): 491-495
KAN Songsong, QU Xingyi, Rao Shitao, SUN Baozeng, XU Pengliang, YU Chao. Value of intracranial pressure monitoring combined with external ventricular drainage in the treatment of patients with bilateral frontal cerebral contusion after decompressive craniectomy[J]. Medical Journal of the Chinese People Armed Police Forces. 2025, 36(6): 491-495
中图分类号: R605.97   

参考文献

[1] 陈克非,董吉荣,王玉海,等. 双额叶脑挫裂伤的治疗策略及进展恶化的相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华神经外科杂志,2015,31(9):903-906.
[2] 李仕渊,薛昕,李雷.双额叶脑挫裂伤的诊疗进展[J]. 中国微侵袭神经外科杂志,2019,24(12):572-574.
[3] Peterson E C, Chesnut R M.Talk and die revisited:bifrontal contusions and late deterioration[J]. J Trauma,2011,71(6):1588-1592.
[4] Rehman T, Ali R,Tawil I,et al. Rapid progression of traumatic bifrontal contusions to transtentorial herniation: a case report[J]. Cases J,2008,1(1):203.
[5] 徐勤义, 董吉荣, 王玉海,等. 损伤控制治疗双额叶脑挫裂伤、脑内血肿的讨论[J]. 中国微侵袭神经外科杂志,2015,20(9):402-404.
[6] 薛俊锋, 张五中, 赵峻波,等. 双侧标准外伤大骨瓣与双额冠状骨瓣在重型颅脑损伤去骨瓣减压术中的应用[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志,2018,23(3):194-195.
[7] 孟庆虎, 孟华,丁璇,等. 持续颅内压监测在额叶脑挫裂伤患者治疗中的作用[EB/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志,2015,1(2):17-20.
[8] Jack I J, David F S.神经重症监护操作手册[M]. 西安:世界图书出版西安有限公司,2023:8-15.
[9] Gao L,Wu X,Hu J,et al. Intensive management and prognosis of 127 cases with traumatic bilateral frontal contusions[J]. World Neurosurg,2013,80(6):879-888.
[10] Bor-Seng-Shu E, de-Lima-Oliveira M, Nogueira R C, et al. Decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury:postoperative TCD cerebral hemodynamic evaluation[J]. Front Neurol, 2019, 12(10): 354.
[11] 吴虹刚,张召,张道宝,等. 持续颅内压监测在双额叶脑挫裂伤治疗中的价值分析[J]. 中外医学研究,2017,15(30):3-5.
[12] 中华医学会神经病学分会神经重症协作组,中国医师协会神经内科医师分会神经重症专业委员会. 难治性颅内压增高的监测与治疗中国专家共识[J]. 中华医学杂志,2018,98(45):3643-3652.
[13] 中国医师协会神经外科医师分会,中国神经创伤专家委员会. 中国颅脑创伤颅内压监测专家共识[J]. 中华神经外科杂志,2011,27(10):1073-1074.
[14] 张建宁,王任直,胡锦,等. 神经外科重症监护手册[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2016:73-74.
[15] 尉俊杰,刘慧芳. 快速细孔钻颅侧脑室外引流术在救治急性重症颅脑疾病中的应用[J]. 中国医药科学,2015,5(4):163-165,170.
[16] Hockel K,Schuhmann M U.ICP monitoring by open extraventricular drainage:common practice but not suitable for advanced neuromonitoring and prone to false negativity[J]. Acta Neurochir Supple, 2018, 126(3):281-286.
[17] 程科,方宪清,程彪,等.有创动态颅内压监测在重度颅脑损伤治疗中的应用效果观察[J].山西医药杂志,2019,48(4):471-474.
[18] 王忠,韩志桐,吴日乐,等. 持续颅内压监测及标准大骨瓣减压术治疗重度颅脑损伤的临床研究[J]. 华南国防医学杂志,2020,34(2):146-148.
[19] 王志明,殷尚炯,王阳春,等. 持续颅内压监测在小脑梗死手术中的应用(附12例报告)[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志,2014,19(2):112-113.
[20] 蔡湛,范月超,单学仕,等. ICP监测在创伤性急性弥漫性脑肿胀治疗中的应用体会[J]. 徐州医科大学学报,2021,41(9):672-676.
[21] 李松年. 对冲性双额叶脑挫裂伤的治疗体会[J]. 中国临床神经外科杂志,2011,16(12):744-745.
[22] 朱青峰,王国芳,周志国. 持续颅内压监测在双额叶脑挫裂伤致中央型脑疝救治中的应用[J]. 中国实用神经疾病杂志,2012,15(14):39-41.
[23] 张桂运,海舰,詹青.颅内压监测在硬膜外血肿合并脑挫裂伤患者中的应用[J]. 同济大学学报(医学版),2012,33(3):85-86,93.

PDF(2101 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/