B7-H4、NGF、HE4、TrkA表达与宫颈癌病情进展、预后的关系

张晓梅, 曲冬颖

武警医学 ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (8) : 679-686.

PDF(1421 KB)
PDF(1421 KB)
武警医学 ›› 2025, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (8) : 679-686.
论著

B7-H4、NGF、HE4、TrkA表达与宫颈癌病情进展、预后的关系

  • 张晓梅, 曲冬颖
作者信息 +

Relationship between the expression of B7-H4, NGF, HE4 and TrkA and the progression and prognosis of cervical cancer

  • ZHANG Xiaomei, QU Dongying
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 探讨共刺激分子B7同源体4(B7-H4)、神经生长因子(NGF)、人附睾蛋白4(HE4)、酪氨酸激酶(TrkA)表达水平与宫颈癌病情进展、预后的关系。方法 选取2019-01至2022-12在北部战区总医院行宫颈癌根治术患者102例为研究对象,取术中切除的肿瘤组织作为标本,采用免疫组化法检测B7-H4、NGF、HE4、TrkA表达水平,比较不同FIGO分期、肿瘤分级、是否伴淋巴结转移患者宫颈组织B7-H4、NGF、HE4、TrkA表达。所有患者均随访至2024-06,比较死亡与存活患者宫颈组织B7-H4、NGF、HE4、TrkA表达差异。结果 Ⅱb期19例,IⅡa期29例,Ib期31例,Ia期23例,不同FIGO分期患者B7-H4、NGF、TrkA 、HE4表达水平比较,差异有统计学意义。肿瘤分级G1级27例,G2级50例,G3级25例,不同肿瘤分级患者B7-H4、NGF、TrkA、HE4表达水平比较,差异有统计学意义。浸润深度59例≤1/2,43例>1/2,浸润深度>1/2患者与浸润深度≤1/2患者中B7-H4、NGF、TrkA、HE4表达水平比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。无淋巴结转移61例,有淋巴结转移41例,有淋巴结转移患者与无淋巴结转移患者中B7-H4、NGF、TrkA、HE4表达水平比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。所有患者均随访至2023-12,平均随访62.4个月,存活58例(56.86%),死亡44例(43.14%)。存活组与死亡组B7-H4、NGF、TrkA、HE4阳性表达水平比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。建立 R0C 曲线,B7-H4、NGF、HE4、TrkA单独预测宫颈癌患者预后的AUC(95%CI)分别为0.782(0.696~0.889)、0.741(0.637~0.846)、0.625(0.506~0.744)、0.797(0.696~0.898),均有预测价值。联合预测的 AUC(95%CI)为0.919(0.856~0.982),高于单独预测。结论 B7-H4、NGF、HE4、TrkA预测宫颈癌患者预后有一定价值,联合预测可提高预测的敏感度和特异度,可作为预测病情进展和预后的分子标志物的潜在靶点。

Abstract

Objective To study the relationship between the expression levels of costimulatory molecule B7 homolog 4 (B7-H4), nerve growth factor (NGF), human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), and tyrosine kinase (TrkA) and the progression and prognosis of cervical cancer. Methods A total of 102 patients who underwent radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer at General Hospital of PLA Northern Theater Command from January 2019 to December 2022 were selected, and their tumor tissues removed during the operation were used as samples. The expression of B7-H4, NGF, HE4 and TrkA was detected by immunohistochemistry. The expression levels of B7-H4, NGF, HE4 and TrkA in cervical tissues of patients with different FIGO stages, tumor grades, and whether accompanied by lymph node metastasis was compared. All the patients were followed up until June 2024, and the differences in the expression of B7-H4, NGF, HE4 and TrkA in cervical tissues between the dead and surviving patients were compared. Results Among the 102 patients, 19 were stage IIb, 29 were stage IIa, 31 were stage Ib, and 23 were stage Ia. Expression levels of B7-H4, NGF, TrkA and HE4 differed significantly across the different FIGO stages (P< 0.05).Histologic grading was G1 in 27 cases, G2 in 50 cases and G3 in 25 cases. Expression levels of B7-H4, NGF, TrkA and HE4 varied significantly among the different tumour grades (P < 0.05).Depth of cervical stromal invasion was ≤ 1/2 in 59 patients and > 1/2 in 43 patients. Expression levels of B7-H4, NGF, TrkA and HE4 were significantly higher in patients with invasion > 1/2 than in those with invasion ≤ 1/2 (P < 0.05).Lymph-node metastasis was absent in 61 patients and present in 41 patients. Expression levels of B7-H4, NGF, TrkA and HE4 were significantly higher in patients with lymph-node metastasis than in those without (P < 0.05).All patients were followed up until December 2023 (mean follow-up, 62.4 months). At the last follow-up, 58 patients (56.86 %) were alive and 44 (43.14 %) had died. Expression levels of B7-H4, NGF, TrkA and HE4 were significantly different between the survival and death groups (P < 0.05).ROC curves were constructed to evaluate the prognostic performance of each biomarker. The area under the curve (AUC) with 95 % confidence interval (CI) was 0.782 (0.696-0.889) for B7-H4, 0.741 (0.637-0.846) for NGF, 0.625 (0.506-0.744) for HE4 and 0.797 (0.696-0.898) for TrkA, indicating that each marker independently predicted prognosis. The combined model yielded an AUC (95 % CI) of 0.919 (0.856-0.982), superior to that of any single marker alone. Conclusion B7-H4, NGF, HE4, and TrkA have certain value in predicting the prognosis of cervical cancer patients. Combined prediction can improve the sensitivity and specificity of prediction and can be used as molecular markers for predicting disease progression and prognosis and potential therapeutic targets.

关键词

B7-H4 / 神经生长因子 / 人附睾蛋白4 / 酪氨酸激酶 / 宫颈癌 / 病情进展 / 预后

Key words

B7-H4 / nerve growth factor / human epididymis protein 4 / tyrosine kinase / cervical cancer / disease progression / prognosis

引用本文

导出引用
张晓梅, 曲冬颖. B7-H4、NGF、HE4、TrkA表达与宫颈癌病情进展、预后的关系[J]. 武警医学. 2025, 36(8): 679-686
ZHANG Xiaomei, QU Dongying. Relationship between the expression of B7-H4, NGF, HE4 and TrkA and the progression and prognosis of cervical cancer[J]. Medical Journal of the Chinese People Armed Police Forces. 2025, 36(8): 679-686
中图分类号: R737.33   

参考文献

[1] 陈宝杰,杜丹,邓宇,等.106例局部晚期宫颈癌根治性同步放化疗的临床疗效及预后影响因素[J].现代妇产科进展,2023,32(3):207-213.
[2] 王磊,王瑗瑗,江艳婷,等.SNX10在宫颈癌中的表达及其与预后、免疫浸润的关系[J].临床肿瘤学杂志,2025,30(1):19-26.
[3] 凌佳怡,谢芳,杜婷,等.免疫检查点分子PD-L1和B7-H4在卵巢癌组织中的表达及意义[J].现代免疫学,2023,43(1):36-41.
[4] 曹秋逸. B7-H4在EGFR突变体肺癌细胞中的表达调控研究[D].苏州:苏州大学,2022.
[5] 张倩倩. 免疫检查点B7-H3和B7-H4在子宫颈癌及癌前病变中的表达及意义[D].济南:山东大学,2021.
[6] 苏雅婷,吕杰,牛雯娟等.PD-L1、B7-H3及B7-H4在宫颈癌免疫治疗中的研究进展[J].国际妇产科学杂志,2021,48(4):457-461.
[7] 张元芬,龙颖,姚德生.嗜神经侵袭与宫颈癌临床病理特征的相关性及对预后的影响[J].中国癌症防治杂志,2025,17(1):109-114.
[8] Buskwofie A,David W G,Clare C A.A review of cervical cancer: incidence and disparities[J].J Natl Med Assoc,2020,112(2): 229-232.
[9] 肖献花,郭丽娜,呼慧军,等.宫颈癌患者血清LncRNA SFTA1P和LncRNA UBE2R2-AS1表达水平与预后的关系[J].安徽医学,2025,46(1):22-27.
[10] 孔北华,刘继红,殷爱军,等.妇科肿瘤免疫检查点抑制剂临床应用指南(2023版)[J].现代妇产科进展,2023,32(5):321-348.
[11] 胡晓君,雷磊,胡艳,等.B7-H4在宫颈癌组织中的表达及与临床病理特征的关系[J].现代肿瘤医学,2021,29(6):1012-1016.
[12] 吴燕,兰小妍,张照平,等. HE4、SCC-Ag与局部晚期宫颈癌同步放化疗患者预后的关系[J].长春中医药大学学报,2025,41(1):80-84.
[13] 刘亚红,邱育红,王欣.血清鳞状细胞癌抗原(SCC-Ag)、癌胚抗原(CEA)、细胞角蛋白19片段(CYFRA21-1)和HE4联合检测在宫颈癌诊断中的临床价值[J].贵州医药,2022,46(6):843-844,847.
[14] 胡伯媛,许厚本,杨耀,等.实时超声弹性成像参数、血清CA153、IGF1及HE4水平与早期宫颈癌临床病理特征的关系及其预测价值分析[J].现代生物医学进展,2024,24(7):1335-1339.
[15] Stella C,Francesco P,Andrea M,et al.Further insight into prognostic factors in endometrial cancer: the new serum biomarker HE4[J].Expert Rev Anticancer Ther,2016,17(1):9-18.
[16] 张宁宁,杨哲,檀丽梅,等.宫颈细胞DNA倍体分析联合B7-H4和PKCδ对宫颈癌的诊断价值[J].国际肿瘤学杂志,2024,51(5):286-291.
[17] 黄安妮,梅馨予,王黎明,等.SLC15A3基因影响HPV阳性宫颈癌预后和免疫浸润的研究[J].现代妇产科进展,2023,32(6):414-420.
[18] Garrido M P,Torres I,Avila A,et al.NGF/TRKA decrease miR-145-5p levels in epithelial ovarian cancer cells[J].Int J Mol Sci,2020,21(20):611-612.
[19] 张瀚元,王静,刘湘涛.基于RNA-seq数据识别宫颈癌嵌合体RNA及预后标志基因[J].新疆医科大学学报,2025,48(1):29-36.
[20] Zheng Q,Fu X, Jiang J,et al.Umbilical cord mesenchymal stemcell transplantation prevents chemotherapy-induced ovarianfailure via the NGF/TrkA pathway in rats[J].Bio Med Res Int,2019,7(1):1-9.

PDF(1421 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/