整合式干预措施联合摇篮式怀抱法在新生儿股静脉划线定位斜刺采血中的应用效果

刘瑞华, 燕燕, 郭晶芳, 李志宏

武警医学 ›› 2026, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1) : 59-62.

PDF(923 KB)
PDF(923 KB)
武警医学 ›› 2026, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1) : 59-62.
论著

整合式干预措施联合摇篮式怀抱法在新生儿股静脉划线定位斜刺采血中的应用效果

  • 刘瑞华1, 燕燕1, 郭晶芳1, 李志宏2
作者信息 +

Application effect of integrated intervention measures combined with cradle-holding method in neonatal femoral vein blood collection through line marking and oblique puncture

  • LIU Ruihua1, YAN Yan1, GUO Jingfang1, LI Zhihong2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 探讨整合式干预措施联合摇篮式怀抱法在新生儿股静脉划线定位斜刺采血中的应用效果。方法 选取2024年1-12月武警特色医学中心儿科行股静脉采血的153例新生儿为研究对象,根据治疗的单、双日分为联合组(n=84)、对照组(n=69)。联合组采用整合式干预措施联合摇篮式怀抱法行股静脉划线定位斜刺采血,对照组采用常规新生儿护理模式进行股静脉划线定位斜刺采血。对两组患儿一针穿刺成功率、疼痛评估情况、采血时长、家长满意度及操作后相关反应进行比较。结果 联合组一针穿刺成功率(96.43%)明显高于对照组(84.06%);联合组轻度疼痛构成比(52.38%)高于对照组(39.13%),而重度疼痛构成比(2.38%)显著低于对照组(11.59%);联合组平均采血时长为(54.30±3.80)s,显著短于对照组的(66.23±6.65)s;联合组家长满意度(95.24%)明显高于对照组(84.06%), 其中联合组对操作非常满意的家长(>95分)明显多于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);联合组对减轻患儿重度疼痛方面优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组之间的操作相关反应差异无统计学意义。结论 新生儿股静脉划线定位斜刺采血协同整合式干预措施联合摇篮式怀抱法可提高一针穿刺成功率、缩短采血时长,家长满意度高,其效果明显优于常规护理。

Abstract

Objective To explore the application effect of integrated intervention measures combined with cradle-holding method in neonatal femoral vein blood collection through line marking and oblique puncture. Methods A total of 153 newborns who underwent femoral vein blood collection in the Pediatrics Department of Characteristics Medical Center of Chinese People’s Armed Police Force from January to December 2024 were selected as the study subjects, and were divided into a combined group (n=84) and a control group (n=69) based on the odd or even days of treatment.The combined group received integrated intervention measures combined with the cradle-holding method for femoral vein line marking and oblique puncture blood collection, while the control group underwent conventional neonatal care mode for femoral vein line marking and oblique puncture blood collection. The success rate of one-needle puncture, pain assessment, blood collection duration, parental satisfaction, and related reactions after the operation were compared between the two groups. Results Compared with the control group, the success rate of one-needle puncture in the combined group was significantly higher(96.43% vs 84.06%), and so was the mild pain rate (52.38% vs 39.13%) and the severe pain rate (2.38% vs 11.59%). The average blood collection duration in the combined group (54.3±3.802) s was significantly shorter than that in the control group (66.23±6.651) s;parental satisfaction in the combined group (95.24%) was significantly higher than that in the control group (84.06%), and the number of parents who were very satisfied with the operation (>95 points) in the combined group was significantly more than that in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05);the combined group was superior to the control group in alleviating severe pain of the children, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05);there was no statistically significant difference in the operation-related reactions between the two groups. Conclusions The integrated intervention measures combined with cradle-holding method for femoral vein line marking and oblique puncture blood collection in newborns can improve the one-puncture success rate, shorten the blood collection duration, and have high parents’ satisfaction, whose effect is significantly better than conventional care.

关键词

整合式 / 摇篮式怀抱法 / 新生儿股静脉采血 / 划线定位斜刺法

Key words

integrated intervention measure / cradle-holding method / neonatal femoral vein blood collection / line marking and oblique puncture method

引用本文

导出引用
刘瑞华, 燕燕, 郭晶芳, 李志宏. 整合式干预措施联合摇篮式怀抱法在新生儿股静脉划线定位斜刺采血中的应用效果[J]. 武警医学. 2026, 37(1): 59-62
LIU Ruihua, YAN Yan, GUO Jingfang, LI Zhihong. Application effect of integrated intervention measures combined with cradle-holding method in neonatal femoral vein blood collection through line marking and oblique puncture[J]. Medical Journal of the Chinese People Armed Police Forces. 2026, 37(1): 59-62
中图分类号: R473.73    R722   

参考文献

[1] 罗乔芬.新生儿股静脉采血两种穿刺方法的应用探讨[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2019,6(35):51-54.
[2] 薄 杰,翟秀玲.两种穿刺方法在新生儿股静脉采血中的应用效果比较[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2017,23(6):94-95.
[3] 高贵霞,牛晓桂,李化娉,等.整合式心理干预对住院婴儿头皮静脉留置针穿刺的影响[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2019,40(6):776-778.
[4] 卢 敏.整合式心理护理对住院婴幼儿头皮静脉留置针穿刺的影响[J].中国民康医学,2020,32(19):148-150.
[5] 周宇阳,杨军杰,聂春红,等.溶血三项、网织红细胞与血清总胆红素联合诊断新生儿溶血病的价值[J].深圳中西医结合杂志,2023,33(16):59-61.
[6] 崔 焱,张玉侠.儿科护理学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2022:134-139.
[7] 陈伟霞.新生儿股静脉与头皮静脉采血方法的对比研究及护理 [J].护理管理,2014,11(15):108-110.
[8] 刘宜玲,鄢建华,杨 佳.划线定位斜刺法对新生儿股静脉采血穿刺成功率的影响[J].基层医学论坛,2021,25(24):3544-3545.
[9] 刘华桃,廖 文.音乐干预联合轻柔手法减轻新生儿足跟采血疼痛程度的临床观察[J].现代诊断与治疗,2024,35(11):1722-1724.
[10] 王文丽,张香芝,赵利娟,等.新生儿抚触联合中医穴位按摩护理在新生儿黄疸中的应用研究[J].实用中医内科杂志,2024,38(5):120-123.
[11] Lin S Y,Chen J X,Li L.Comparison of three scales for as-sessing pain in neonates after surgery under mechanical ventilation and non-mechanical ventilation [J].J Nurs Adm,2023,23(2):100-104.
[12] 陈伟霞.疼痛护理干预在新生儿护理中的研究[J].吉林医学,2014,35(13):2916-2917.
[13] 丘彦常.新生儿发育过程中有哪些特点[N].医疗养生保健报,2024-3-23(007).
[14] Hyland C A,O’Brien H,Flower R L, et al.Noninvasive prenatal testing for management of haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn induced by maternal alloimmunisation[J].Transfus Apher Sci,2020,59(5):102947.
[15] 孔春香,马 新.音乐疗法对静脉留置针穿刺患儿疼痛及穿刺成功率的影响[J].首都食品与医药, 2018,25(19):105.
[16] 秦 伟,吴龙艳.体位支持、非营养性吸吮配合轻柔抚触对新生儿股静脉穿刺采血疼痛的影响[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2024,32(6):1356-1359.
[17] 赵 奇,张厚玲,赵 鑫.预见性护理干预应用于小儿静脉留置针穿刺中的效果及对并发症的影响观察[J].中国社区医师,2021,37(22):166-167.
[18] 贾鹤男.护理干预对体检者采血后皮下血肿形成的影响[J].国际护理学杂志,2014,33(1):227-228.
[19] 顾 丹,成 幸,施 玥.非营养性吸吮联合抚触干预对足跟采血新生儿疼痛程度及哭闹情况的影响[J].中外医疗,2024,43(23):187-190.
[20] 薛亚倩,赵明亮,宫 平,等.外泌体在慢性疼痛规范化管理中的应用进展[J].武警医学,2023,10(34):913-917.
[21] 陈永强,王景刚,庞 伟,等.新生儿疼痛评估方法的研究进展[J/OL].(2024-10-23)[2024-11-26].https://link.cnki.net/urlid/61.1346.R.20241022.1538.008.
[22] 章满花,程志美,葛亚男,等.个性化的护理干预措施对新生儿侵入性操作引起疼痛的影响[J].妇儿健康导刊,2023,2(2):135-137.

PDF(923 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/